Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15882 Ori
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.39228 of 2023
M/s. Jagbandhu Enterprises ..... Petitioner
Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar
Mr. P.K. Rath, Sr. Advocate along
with Mr. A. Behera, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Others ..... Opposite Parties
Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
11.12.2023 Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
01.
2. Heard.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"The Petitioner, therefore, prays that your Lordships would be graciously pleased to admit this writ petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties allow the same, issue writ/writs in the nature of certiorari/mandamus and/or any other further writ/direction and direct the Opposite Parties/State Authorities to take immediate steps for removal of all sorts of obstructions and provide protection to the petitioner to operate the Nihal Prasad Road Metal Quarry-V & VI.
And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray."
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting its grievance, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be considered taking into consideration
the judgment of this Court in Chambara Soy v. State of Orissa & Ors., 2007 SCC OnLine Ori 42, M/s. Shakti Bricks v. Collector, Bhadrak & Ors., 2008 SCC OnLine Ori 357 and the order of this Court in Sanjeev Parida &Others v. State of Odisha & Others (W.P.(C) No.37019 of 2021 and batch, disposed of on 24.01.2023), in which one of us (M.S. Raman, J) is a Member, within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-8, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in Chambara Soy, M/s. Shakti Bricks & Sanjeev Parida (supra) as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Laxmikant (M.S. RAMAN)
JUDGE
Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA
Designation: SENIOR STENOGRAPHER
Reason: Authentication
Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 11-Dec-2023 17:51:22
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!