Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sasmita Panda @ vs Dipankar Satapathy
2022 Latest Caselaw 3665 Ori

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3665 Ori
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2022

Orissa High Court
Sasmita Panda @ vs Dipankar Satapathy on 3 August, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                            MATA No. 92 of 2020

        Sasmita Panda @                  ....            Appellant
        Satapathy
                           Mr. Ashok Kumar Das, Advocate
                            -versus-
        Dipankar Satapathy           ....       Respondent
                                Mr. G.K. Mohanty, Advocate
                     CORAM:
                     JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
                     JUSTICE M. S. SAHOO

                                       ORDER

Order No. 03.08.2022

16. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. By means of this appeal filed U/s.19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the judgment dated 27.08.2020 passed in C.P. No.357 of 2014 by the Judge, Family Court, Cuttack has been challenged.

3. The respondent instituted the matrimonial suit being C.P. No.357 of 2014 for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. According to the Judge, Family Court, the ground of cruelty has been well established and in consequence of that finding, the suit was decreed by dissolving the marriage that subsisted between the parties with direction of payment of alimony to the extent of Rs. 3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh & Fifty Thousand) only, out of which, Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs) has been distributed to the appellant herein and the remaining Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) for her daughter. In this appeal, the determination of the alimony has been // 2 //

challenged being unreasonable as by that amount no decent living can be achieved. Moreover, income of the respondent has not been appreciated by the Judge, Family Court.

4. Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel for the appellant has quite robustly submitted that from the affidavit filed by the respondent today (3.8.2022), it would be apparent that in para-5 of the said affidavit, he has declared that he has drawn a sum of Rs.59,738/- for the month of June 2022 and a sum of Rs.58,407/- for the month of July 2022. As such, it can be deduced safely that the respondent has been drawing more than Rs.50,000/- per month. As such the alimony should be determined on the basis of the said income.

5. Mr. G.K. Mohanty, learned counsel for the respondent has quite fairly submitted that though the respondent is presently working in Aurobinda Pharma Ltd., but no formal letter of appointment has yet been issued. It is expected that such letter of appointment will be issued in the month of August, 2022.

6. After interacting with the counsel for the parties and also considering the opinion of Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for the respondent that the respondent has been maintaining one Insurance Policy with assured value of Rs.1,10,000/-, in favour of their daughter vide the Policy No.598216288 dated 17.09.2011, we think the appropriate alimony would be Rs.20,00,000/-

// 3 //

(Rupees twenty lakhs), to be paid by the respondent. Out of that amount, a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs) be distributed to the daughter namely Priyanshi Satapathy and the remaining Rs. 12,00,000/- (Rupees twelve lakhs), shall be paid to the appellant. The said amount should be paid within a period of three months from today. The amount that has been distributed to the daughter (Priyanshi Satapathy) be paid to the appellant by a term deposit certificate which can only be encashed by the said daughter after her attainment of majority. The sum of Rs. 12,00,000/-be paid in the form of Bank Draft/Banker's Cheque in favour of the appellant within the said stipulated period. Charges as regards the Bank Draft or the Banker's Cheque be borne by the respondent.

Both the term-deposit certificate and Banker's Cheque/Draft be submitted before the Registrar (Judicial).

7. In terms of the above, the judgment dated 27.08.2020 is interfered with and set aside subject to determination of alimony in the above terms. The matrimonial suit being C.P. No.357 of 2014 is allowed on consensus by dissolving the marriage between the parties.

8. Decree be drawn in terms of the above after the deposit of the said amount which has been determined

// 4 //

as permanent alimony, in the mode as directed. After the decree is drawn, the LCRs be returned.

Affidavit filed by the respondent today is taken on record.

(S. Talapatra) Judge

(M.S. Sahoo) Judge

RRJena/GS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter