Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1 Meg
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2024
Serial No. 03
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
MC[WP(C)] No. 238 of 2023
Date of Order: 29.01.2024
Union of India & 3 Ors. Vs. Shri. Ramesh Chander & 10 Ors.
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI. with
Ms. K. Guruing, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Chanda, Adv.
Mr. M.L. Nongpiur, Adv.
i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.:
ii) Whether approved for publication
in press: Yes/No
ORAL:
1. Heard Dr. N. Mozika, learned DSGI for the applicants/Union
of India, who has submitted that this Court vide judgment and order dated
25.05.2023 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 32 of 2018, has, at para 34
of the same directed the respondents/Union of India to bring out the
relevant Recruitment Rules, the time period given for the same being
3(three) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the
judgment and order. However, even at this point of time, the said
Recruitment Rules have not yet been notified. The learned DSGI has
submitted that this is because of office procedures which involved inter-
departmental consultation, etc., and for which reason, the said
Recruitment Rules could not yet be published in accordance with the
direction of this Court. It is therefore prayed that an extension of the said
3(three) months' period be allowed for a further period of 6(six) months.
2. Mr. M. Chanda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
opposite parties/petitioners, has objected to the prayer made on the ground
that this matter has been pending for a very long time as far as the
publication of the said Recruitment Rules are concerned and for which,
this Court in the said judgment and order dated 25.05.2023(supra) has
remarked at para 8 of the same, wherein it is noticed that even after
17(seventeen) years, the said Recruitment Rules have not yet been
published.
3. Though, there is no strong objection to the prayer made, the
learned counsel has submitted that a period of 6(six) months may not be
granted for such process.
4. This Court, on consideration to the submission made, would
allow the prayer made by the applicants/Union of India and the 3(three)
months' period as indicated at para 34(supra) is hereby extended,
however, as to the prayer for 6(six) months, the same is not found justified
and the Union of India is directed to publish the said Recruitment Rules
within a period of 4(four) months from the date of this order. No further
extension of time will be allowed henceforth.
5. In view of the above noted direction, this application is
accordingly disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya 29.01.2024 "D. Nary, PS"
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!