Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jbam Pvt Ltd vs State Of Manipur & 3 Ors
2026 Latest Caselaw 1571 Mani

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1571 Mani
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Manipur High Court

Jbam Pvt Ltd vs State Of Manipur & 3 Ors on 12 March, 2026

Author: A.Guneshwar Sharma
Bench: A.Guneshwar Sharma
                                        Sup 2 (1-2)
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                       AT IMPHAL


WP(C) No.194 of 2026 with
MC (WP(C)) No.203 of 2026


JBAM Pvt Ltd                                     ... Petitioner

                               -Versus-
State of Manipur & 3 Ors                         ... Respondents

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA 12.3.2026 This matter is taken up on mentioning as supplementary-2, due to urgency involved in the matter.

Mr.N.Ibotombi, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms.Jinita, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Respondent No.4, Executive Engineer, Bishnupur PHE Division, issued order dated 15.10.2021 in favour of M/s Vishnu Prakash R.Punglia Ltd/ respondent No.4 for executing water supply project for the State of Manipur, providing drinking water supply to rural area of Manipur, Package: RWS P-IX (W) on turnkey basis complete. It is also stated that respondent No.4 is also contractor for the Projects for Imphal West, Noney and Tamenglong.

The petitioner, JBAM and respondent No.4 executed a Local Facilitator Agreement dated 14.2.2024 whereby the petitioner is authorised to undertake to work on behalf of the main contractor/respondent No.4 including purchase of pipes and petitioner and respondent No.4 agreed to open an Escrow Account for deposit of the amount received from the State Government for execution of the contract.

Thereafter, petitioner placed nine purchase orders from different manufacturers of GI & DI pipes. As per invoice raised by the Manufacturing Company, the petitioner JBAM is shown as purchaser and respondent No.4 is indicated as the consignee. As per annexures annexed with the petition, petitioner made payments to the manufacturing company for the purchase of GI & DI pipes. The purchased pipes were placed in Shed No.5, FCI Godown, Koirengei, Imphal East and vide order dated 11.9.2024 issued by Director CAF & PD, Manipur, petitioner was given permission to store the GI & DI pipes purchased by the petitioner in connection the project work undertaken by the PHED, Manipur for a period of two years by paying monthly rent. Petitioner is aggrieved by the joint letters dated 7.3.2026 submitted by the Executive Engineers, PHE Division, Imphal West, Tamenglong, Noney and Bushnupur to the Superintendent of Police, Imphal East requesting for providing security arrangement for lifting the GI & DI pipes from Luwangsangbam Godown to PHED store, Lamphel.

Petitioner has also submitted representation dated 8.3.2026 to the Superintendent of Police, Imphal West stating that the GI & DI pipes stored in FCI Godown Luwangsangbam are his own property and same may not be allowed to be lifted without consent of the petitioner.

Mr.N.ibotombi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the GI & DI pipes purchased by the petitioner on behalf of respondent No.4 are stored in the Godown of Luwangsangbam as awaiting payment.

Issue Notice.

Ms.Ch.Sundari, learned Government Advocate assisting Mr.S.Nepolean, learned Sr.GA accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3.

Petitioner is directed to take steps on respondent No.4 by speed post and dasti in addition to local authorised signatory of respondent No.4.

Mr.N.Ibotombi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner prays for an interim protection staying lifting of GI & DI pipes at the Luwangsangbam Godown to the PHED, Manipur Godown Lamphel, till the next date. Mr.Ibotombi, learned counsel also suggests that the State respondents may be directed for intimating name of authorised local signatory of respondent No.4 so that the petitioner is enabled to serve notice/summon upon respondent No.4.

Mr.S.Nepolean, learned Sr.GA submits that in terms of contract, without prior approval contractor cannot execute sub- contractor and in the present case, sub-contract between the petitioner and respondent No.4 is not tenable and petitioner is employee of respondent No.4.

It is also stated that a sum of Rs.38,30,93,262/- and Rs.39,28,20,071/- had already been paid by the State respondents to the main contractor/respondent No.4.

Mr.N.Ibotombi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been fully paid for the purchase made on behalf of respondent No.4.

List this case on 17.3.2026.

Prayer for interim relief will be considered on the next date. Till 17.3.2026, GI & DI pipes stored by the petitioner in Shed No.5, Luwangsangbam Godown shall not be lifted.

Furnish a copy of this order to learned counsel for the parties.

JUDGE

Priyojit

RAJKUMA Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR R PRIYOJIT PRIYOJIT SINGH Date: 2026.03.13 SINGH 11:15:20 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter