Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Angom James Singh vs T. Ranjan Singh
2026 Latest Caselaw 85 Mani

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 85 Mani
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Manipur High Court

Angom James Singh vs T. Ranjan Singh on 30 January, 2026

Author: Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Bench: Ahanthem Bimol Singh
                                                                            IN. 27
SHOUGRAKPAM Digitally signed by
            SHOUGRAKPAM
DEVANANDA DEVANANDA SINGH
            Date: 2026.01.30 14:26:50
SINGH       +05'30'


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                                         AT IMPHAL
           Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025
           Angom James Singh                                 ... Petitioner
                 Vs.
           T. Ranjan Singh                                   ... Respondent

                                  B E F O R E
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH

                                        O R D E R

30-01-2026

Heard Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Y. Neha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. I. Lalitkumar, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Alina, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

It has been submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent that the direction given by this court has been duly complied with by the respondents by issuing a Memorandum dated 20-11-2025 and as such, the present contempt can be closed.

Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a rider may be made that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said compliance order, he is at liberty to challenge the same by filing appropriate petition before the appropriate forum as provided by law.

In view of the submission made by the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties and after perusal of the compliance report

Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Contd.../-

dated 24-11-2025 submitted by the respondents, this court is satisfied that the direction given by this court on 14-05-2024 in CRP(CRP Art.

227) No. 2 of 2024 has been duly complied with by the respondents. Accordingly, the present contempt case is hereby closed.

Needless to say that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said compliance order, he is at liberty to challenge the same by filing appropriate petition before the appropriate forum as provided under the law.

JUDGE Devananda

Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Contd.../-

                                                                    IN. 28 & 29
SHOUGRAKPAM       Digitally signed by
                  SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA
DEVANANDA         SINGH
                  Date: 2026.01.30 14:27:10
SINGH             +05'30'


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                                              AT IMPHAL

MC(CRP(CRP Art. 227)) No. 94 of 2025 (Ref:- CRP(CRP Art. 227) No. 2 of 2024) Manoharmayum Nandakishor Sharma & ors. ... Applicants Vs. Takhellambam Thomas Singh & anr. ... Respondents With

B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH

O R D E R

30-01-2026

In view of the order passed today in the connected contempt case, the present applications stand closed.

JUDGE Devananda

Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Contd.../-

                                                                            IN. 30
SHOUGRAKPAM       Digitally signed by
                  SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA
DEVANANDA         SINGH
                  Date: 2026.01.30 14:27:27
SINGH             +05'30'

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                                              AT IMPHAL

      Manoharmayum Nandakishor Sharma                       ... Petitioner
             Vs.
      State of Manipur & ors.                               ... Respondents

                                B E F O R E

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH

O R D E R

30-01-2026 Mr. S. Biswajit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. W. Sanatomba, learned counsel appeared for the petitioner; Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appeared for the respondents No. 1 to 4 and Mr. I. Sandeep, learned counsel appeared on behalf of respondent No. 5.

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5 submitted that the petitioner has filed an additional affidavit only yesterday and as such, the learned counsel seeks three weeks' time to file a reply thereto.

Prayer is allowed.

It has been submitted at the bar that the present writ petition does not pertains to service matter.

In view of the submission made above, registry is directed to list this case before the appropriate roster bench on 18-03-2026.

JUDGE Devananda

Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Contd.../-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter