Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Representatives Of Lois vs State Of Manipur & Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 414 Mani

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 414 Mani
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022

Manipur High Court
Representatives Of Lois vs State Of Manipur & Anr on 14 September, 2022
                                                               Item No. 56, 57 & 2
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                           AT IMPHAL

                     WP(C) No. 733 of 2022 with
                     WP(C) No. 194 of 2022 with
                      WP(C) No. 759 of 2022

   Representatives of Lois, Wangoo Brnach
                                                     .....Petitioner/s
    - Versus -

   State of Manipur & Anr.
                                                     .... Respondent/s

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH

14.09.2022

Heard Mr. Sh. Athoi Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C) No. 194 of 2022, Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C) No. 733 of 2022. Heard also Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned G.A. appearing for the respondents.

Since the facts and issues raised in the present 3 (three) writ petitions are identical, the same are being disposed of by this common order.

The present 3 (three) writ petitions have been filed with a prayer for directing the Deputy Commissioner, Kakching to issue status certificates to the individual applicants belonging to different Sageis as mentioned hereunder:

(1) 19 (nineteen) identified Sageis in respect of Waikhong Village, viz, (i) Sapam, (ii) Abujam, (iii) Sanasam, (iv) Khuraijam, (v) Elangbam, (vi) Thoudam, (vii) Keisam,

(viii) Laishram, (ix) Khumanthem, (x) Oinam, (xi) Kshetrimayum, (xii) Huidrom, (xiii) Chirom, (xiv) Moirangthem, (xv) Soibam, (xvi) Hidam, (xvii) Angom, (xviii) Hijam & (xix) Thounaojam;

(2) 11 (eleven) identified Sageis in respect of Sugnu Village, viz, (i) Khaidem, (ii) Yumlembam, (iii) Nongmaithem, (iv) Moirangthem, (v) Angom, (vi) Ningthoujam, (vii) Hijam,

(viii) Thokchom, (ix) Aheibam, (x) Abujam & (xi) Sarangthem; and (3) 8 (eight) identified Sageis in respect of Wangoo Village, viz, (i) Amom, (ii) Loitongbam, (iii) Sanasam, (iv) Khangembam, (v) Sagolsem, (vi) Yumnam, (vii) Moirangthem & (viii) Laishram.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties that similar issue with regard to granting scheduled caste certificate to the applicants belonging to the aforesaid Sageis residing in Waikhong Village, Sugnu Village and Wangoo Village had already been decided by this Court in its judgment and order dated 09.11.2021 passed in WP(C) No. 86 of 2021 and that the issue raised in the present 3 (three) writ petitions are squarely covered by the said judgment and order dated 09.11.2021. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the present writ petitions can be disposed of in terms of the said judgment and order.

Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned G.A. appearing for the respondents, submitted that in the counter affidavit filed by respondent No. 2 in WP(C) No. 194 of 2022, it has been admitted by the authorities that the Deputy Commissioner, Kakching is the competent authority to consider and identify the eligible candidates and to issue scheduled caste certificate. The learned counsel also fairly submitted that the issue raised in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment and order dated 09.11.2021 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 86 of 2021 and the present writ petitions can be disposed of in terms of the said judgment and order.

In view of the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the record of the present cases, this Court is of the view that the present writ petitions can be disposed of by granting similar relief as has been granted by this Court in its judgment and order dated 09.11.2021 passed in WP(C) No. 86 of 2021.

Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed of by directing the Deputy Commissioner, Kakching to consider the claim of the present petitioners strictly in terms of the judgment and order dated 09.11.2021 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 86 of 2021 and to issue necessary certificates. It is also directed that the whole process should be completed within a period of 4 (four) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order With the aforesaid directions, the present 3 (three) writ petitions are disposed of.

JUDGE joshua

KH. JOSHUA Digitally signed by KH.

                           JOSHUA MARING

                MARING     Date: 2022.09.14
                           16:42:48 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter