Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 310 Mani
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021
KABORA Digitally signed Item No.2 & 1
by
MBAM KABORAMBAM
(Through Video Conferencing)
SANDEE SANDEEP SINGH
Date: 2021.11.29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
P SINGH 16:03:23 +05'30'
AT IMPHAL
W.A. No. 33 of 2021
with
MC (W.A.) No. 73 of 2021
State of Manipur; & Anr.
Appellants
Vs.
Kh. Kesho Singh
Respondent
BEFORE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJAY KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KH. NOBIN SINGH 29.11.2021 Sanjay Kumar (C.J.):
Heard Mr. S. Rupachandra, learned Additional Advocate General,
Manipur; appearing for the appellants; and Mr. Kh. Tarunkumar, learned counsel,
appearing for the respondent/writ petitioner.
The State of Manipur and the Director, (Rural Development &
Panchayati Raj), Government of Manipur, seek to maintain this appeal against the
judgment and order dated 25.02.2020 passed in W.P. (C) No. 299 of 2017 by a
learned Judge of this Court. MC (W.A) No. 73 of 2021 was filed by them
thereafter seeking stay of the operation of the said order.
Having heard Mr. S. Rupachandra, learned Additional Advocate
General, Manipur, appearing for the appellants, and Mr. Kh. Tarunkumar, learned
counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner, on 27.08.2021, this Court admitted the
appeal, being of the opinion that it was appropriate to look into it on merits as
related to fixation of pay.
However, when the matter was taken up for hearing again on
28.10.2201, this Court found that the order under appeal was in the nature of a
W.A. No. 33 of 2021 With MC (W.A) No. 73 of 2021 Page 1 simple direction to the authorities to consider the matter afresh after hearing the
respondent/writ petitioner and upon taking note of all the relevant particulars,
including the order dated 23.01.2018 of the Department of Personnel and
Administrative Reforms, Government of Manipur, and to extend benefit to the
respondent/writ petitioner in accordance with law within a time frame.
Mr. S. Rupachandra, learned Additional Advocate General, Manipur,
was accordingly asked to get instructions as to whether the appellants were really
keen on pursuing the appeal as the innocuous order of the learned Judge was
only to the effect that the matter should be reconsidered after giving an
opportunity of hearing to him.
Today, Mr. S. Rupachandra, learned Additional Advocate General,
Manipur, produced before us a copy of the letter dated 25.11.2021 addressed to
him by the Joint Secretary (RD & PR), Government of Manipur, stating that the
Director, (RD & PR), Government of Manipur, would consider the case of the
respondent/writ petitioner, as directed by the learned Judge in the order dated
25.02.2021 passed in W.P. (C) No. 299 of 2017. The learned Additional Advocate
General, Manipur, stated that the appellants will abide by the said order and are
not interested in pursuing this appeal further.
Recording the said statement, the writ appeal is dismissed as not
pressed. In turn, MC (W.A) No. 73 of 2021 shall also stand dismissed.
In the circumstances, we make no order as to costs.
A copy of this order shall be supplied online or through whatsapp to
the learned counsel for the parties.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Sandeep W.A. No. 33 of 2021 With MC (W.A) No. 73 of 2021 Page 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!