Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1398 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2026
W.P.(MD) No.7161 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 17.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
W.P.(MD) No.7161 of 2026
D.Nedunchelian ... Petitioner
-vs-
The Management of
Tamilnadu State Transport
Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.,
Trichy Region
rep.by its General Manager
Trichy ... Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue
a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to refund the amount of
Rs.2,37,200/- recovered from the petitioner in the name of increment cut
recovery, together with 12% interest per annum.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam
For Respondent : Mr.K.Ramaiah
Standing Counsel
____________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/03/2026 07:19:06 pm )
W.P.(MD) No.7161 of 2026
ORDER
Mr.K.Ramaiah, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the
respondent – Transport Corporation.
2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of
at the admission stage.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent – Transport Corporation.
4. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus
directing the respondent – Transport Corporation to refund the amount of
Rs.2,37,200/- recovered from the petitioner in the name of increment cut,
together with 12% interest per annum.
5. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned
counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
respondent – Transport Corporation, agreed that the issue that arises for
consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the Judgment passed
by the learned Division Bench of this Court vide W.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2020,
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/03/2026 07:19:06 pm )
dated 15.06.2021, wherein it was held that the respondent – Transport
Corporation is not entitled to recover any amount towards unimplemented
orders of punishment of postponement of increment and any such attempt on
the part of the respondent – Transport Corporation was held to be without
jurisdiction.
6. In the light of the above, recovery of Rs.2,37,200/- from the
petitioner towards increment cut is found to be declared as illegal, arbitrary
and contrary to law. Consequently, the respondent – Transport Corporation is
directed to refund the amount of Rs.2,37,200/- to the petitioner together with
6% per annum, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy
of this order.
7. With the above direction, this writ petition is allowed. No costs.
17.03.2026
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
krk
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/03/2026 07:19:06 pm )
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.
krk
17.03.2026
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/03/2026 07:19:06 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!