Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Mathivanan vs The District Collector
2026 Latest Caselaw 835 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 835 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

K.Mathivanan vs The District Collector on 26 February, 2026

Author: G.Jayachandran
Bench: G.Jayachandran
                     BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 26.02.2026

                                                        CORAM:

                            THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
                                               AND
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

                                          W.P(MD)No.3927 of 2026

                     K.Mathivanan                                                      ... Petitioner

                                                         .Vs.

                     1.The District Collector,
                       Thanjavur District,
                       Thanjavur.

                     2.The Tahsildar,
                       Pattukkottai Division,
                       Pattukkottai,
                       Thanjavur District.

                     3.The Tahsildar,
                       Pattukkottai Taluk,
                       Thanjavur District.

                     4.The Block Development Officer,
                       Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.
                     5.The Executive Officer,
                       Soorapallam Revenue Village,
                       Pattukkottai Taluk,
                       Thanjavur District.

                     1/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am )
                     6.The Village Administrative Officer,
                       Soorapallam Village,
                       Pattukkottai,
                       Thanjavur District.

                     7.T.Rajappan                                                           ... Respondents


                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
                     of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus
                     directing the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachments
                     made by the 7th respondent in S.No.295/2 of Soorapallam Village,
                     Pattukkottai Taluk, Thanjavur District which is classified as
                     ‘Mayanam’ as per the Revenue A Register by providing pathway
                     to reach the Mayanam land situated in S.No.295/2 of Soorapalla
                     Village, Pattukkottai Taluk, Thanjavur District based on the
                     petitioner’s representation, dated 21.12.2025.


                                         For Petitioner                : Mr.V.Sasikumar

                                         For R1 to R6                  : Mr.P.Thilak kumar
                                                                         Govt. Pleader
                                         For R6                        : M/s.J.Anandhavalli.

                                                            ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN)

The Public Interest Litigation was filed mixing certain facts

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am ) with an intention to confuse the Court, particularly, the prayer in the Writ Petition as below:

‘’to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachments made by the 7th respondent in S.No.295/2 of Soorapallam Village, Pattukkottai Taluk, Thanjavur District which is classified as ‘Mayanam’ as per the Revenue A Register by providing pathway to reach the Mayanam land situated in S.No.295/2 of Soorapalla Village, Pattukkottai Taluk, Thanjavur District based on the petitioner’s representation, dated 21.12.2025’’.

2.This Court, in the earlier round of litigation, a Writ Petition is filed by one Rajappan in W.P(MD)No.16486 of 2025 and has sought for the prayer that S.No.67/1 and 296/1 of Soorapallam Village, Pattukkottai tluk, Thanjavur District may not be used for burying dead bodies, allowed the Writ Petition stating that unless the land is identified and classified as ‘Mayanam’, there cannot be any burial of bodies. This order was was based on the order of the Full Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1037 of 2023, dated 20.07.2023, in which, one of us has authored that judgment. Now the issue is whether there is any notified Mayanam in that village and whether it has been encroached by any of the private parties. As

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am ) stated earlier, if there is any encroachment in any other place by the seventh respondent, it cannot be mixed with the issue of laying pathway for the Mayanam for the village located in S.No.295/2. However, to reach Mayanam, public has to cross the patta land.

3.The learned counsel for the seventh respondent states that there is no dispute regarding the nature of the land in S.No.295/2 and even according to the Petitioner, land in S.No.295/2 which is classified as ‘Mayanam’ is not put to use for more than 50 years. The Village ‘A’ Register extract which indicates that S.No.295/2 is Mayanam, is not the true reflection of the revenue register.

4.This Court on perusing the records finds that in the earlier round of litigation which we have mentioned above, there is an observation by the learned Single Judge that in the ‘A’ Register S.No,295/2 of Soorapalam village is mentioned as Mayanam. Also a finding to the effect that S.Nos.67/1 and 296/1 is not a notified place for burning dead bodies.

5.The learned counsel for the seventh respondent states that unless and until S.No.295/2 is notified as burial ground, the same cannot be used for burying bodies. She also sates that in the said village, each community has their own burial ground and S.No.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am ) 295/2 is not used as burial ground for more than 50 years.

6.These are the matters to be decided on conducting proper enquiry by the revenue officials. In a Writ Petition, we cannot fix any place as burial ground unless it is duly supported by revenue records. The prayer in the Writ Petition is two fold. One is to remove the encroachment in S.No.295/2 and another one is to provide pathway to reach the Mayanam. The second prayer will arise only when there is certainty about the location of the Mayanam in S.No.295/2. We find that Village ‘A’ Register of the Village show that S.No.295/2 as Mayanam. Whether it is notified as Mayanam in the revenue records has to be examined.

7.Therefore the District Collector, Thanjavur District/first respondent herein is directed to first examine the revenue records and decide whether S.No.295/2 has been notified as Mayanam. Before arriving at a conclusion, he shall give adequate opportunity to the parties and conduct an enquiry and thereafter, take a decision whether the said Mayanam requires any pathway and how to provide pathway and take appropriate decision.

8.With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.










https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                  ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am )
                                                                            [G.J.,J.]    [K.K.R.K.,J.]
                                                                                   26.02.2026

                     NCS : Yes/No
                     Index : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     vsn

                     To

                     1.The District Collector,
                       Thanjavur District,
                       Thanjavur.

                     2.The Tahsildar,
                       Pattukkottai Division,
                       Pattukkottai,
                       Thanjavur District.

                     3.The Tahsildar,
                       Pattukkottai Taluk,
                       Thanjavur District.

                     4.The Block Development Officer,
                       Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.
                     5.The Executive Officer,
                       Soorapallam Revenue Village,
                       Pattukkottai Taluk,
                       Thanjavur District.

6.The Village Administrative Officer, Soorapallam Village, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am ) DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.

vsn

ORDER MADE IN

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am ) 26.02.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter