Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6835 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2025
W.P.No.79 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P.(Crl.)No.79 of 2025
K.Natarajan
S/o.Krishnamurthy ... Petitioner
versus
1. The Inspector of Police
H-2, Guduvanchery Police Station
Chengalpattu District.
2. N.Prema ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying
to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to provide police
protection to the petitioner based on his representation dated 11.04.2025 in
accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jaikumar
For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan
Additional Public Prosecutor, for R1
R2 - unserved
Pg.Nos.1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/09/2025 04:40:58 pm )
W.P.No.79 of 2025
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus,
to direct the 1st respondent to provide Police protection to the petitioner
based on his representation dated 11.04.2025 in accordance with law.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent and perused
the materials available on record.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the property in S.No.71 at
No.13/67, Bhuvaneshwari Amman Nagar, Periyar Street, Thailayaram,
Chengalpattu District is the self-acquired property of the petitioner and he is
residing in the said property for several years. However, the second
respondent, who is the wife of the petitioner tried to take possession of the
subject property. Hence, the petitioner has filed a suit in O.S.No.285 of
2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu and obtained a
decree of permanent injunction in his favour on 09.04.2025. Despite the
judgment and decree, the second respondent is trying to trespass into the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/09/2025 04:40:58 pm )
subject property and hence, the petitioner gave a representation dated
11.04.2025 to the first respondent seeking police protection. Since there
was no response from the first respondent-Police, the present petition is
filed. If at all there is any violation, it is for the petitioner to file appropriate
execution petition and proceed as against the second respondent for penal
action.
4. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be
no order as to costs.
09.09.2025
Index: Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No ms
To
1. The Inspector of Police H-2, Guduvanchery Police Station Chengalpattu District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/09/2025 04:40:58 pm )
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
ms
09.09.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/09/2025 04:40:58 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!