Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Commissioner vs A.Sornam (Died)
2025 Latest Caselaw 6707 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6707 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2025

Madras High Court

Commissioner vs A.Sornam (Died) on 3 September, 2025

Author: C.V.Karthikeyan
Bench: C.V.Karthikeyan, R.Vijayakumar
                                                                                      W.A.(MD) No.912 of 2020


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 03.09.2025

                                                          CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
                                                    and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR


                                             W.A.(MD) No.912 of 2020
                                                      and
                                            C.M.P(MD) No.4957 of 2020


                 Commissioner
                 Panchayat Union
                 Kannankodi
                 Devakottai Taluk
                 Sivagangai District.                                                     ... Appellant/
                                                                                          nd
                                                                                        2 Respondent

                                                               -vs-


                 1.A.Sornam (Died)

                 2. The Authority of the Government of Tamil Nadu
                 Rep. by the Secretary Labour and Employment Department
                 Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

                 3.Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage (TWAD) Board
                 Represented by the Executive Engineer
                 Weekly Market Road, Indian Bank Upstairs

                 ____________
                 Page 1 of 8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:32:52 am )
                                                                                              W.A.(MD) No.912 of 2020


                 Sivagangai.

                 4.Rajalakshmi
                 5.Balamurugan
                 6.Mahalingam
                 7.Malathi
                 8.Minerva Devi                                                                 ... Respondents
                 [R4 to R8 substituted vide order of this
                 Court dated 03.09.2025 in CMP (MD)
                 No.7636 of 2025]

                           Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order,

                 dated 27.07.2020, passed in W.P.(MD) No. 6782 of 2017, on the file of this Court.

                                   For Appellants        : Mr.Periyakaruppan

                                   For R1 & R3           : Mr.Y.Arulanandasamy
                                   For R2                : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran
                                                           Addl. Government Pleader


                                                            JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.]

The writ appeal has been filed by the second respondent in W.P.(MD)

No.6782 of 2017, the Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Kannangudi, Devakottai

Taluk, Sivagangai District, aggrieved by the directions issued by the learned

Single Judge in the order in the writ petition by order dated 28.03.2018 wherein, a

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:32:52 am )

direction was given on the basis of a representation given by the writ petitioner

on 29.09.2017, to take appropriate action against the appellant/second respondent

in the writ petition/Commissioner, Panchayat Union.

2. Necessity to lodge a complaint by the writ petitioner arose since

an award had been passed by the Labour Court, Madurai in I.D.No.44 of 2015 by

award dated 19.01.2015 wherein, the writ petitioner who had been dismissed

from service had been directed to be reinstated with backwages. The writ

petitioner had also filed a claim petition in C.P.No.49 of 2015 under Section

33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The amount payable or receivable

by the writ petitioner was about Rupees Two Lakhs and odd. A Lok Adalat had

been conducted in the very same Labour Court and till that particular date, the

amount was determined as Rupees One Lakh, which the writ petitioner had also

received but however, he was not reinstated to the service. Complaining that he

had been deliberately not reinstated owing to the act of omission by the

Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Kannangudi, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai

District, the writ petitioner had lodged a complaint on 29.09.2017 seeking to

prosecute him. By the order in the writ petition, such permission was granted.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:32:52 am )

Subsequently, the Government had also passed G.O.(D) No.535, Labour and

Employment (B1) Department, dated 26.09.2019 under Section 34(1) of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to prosecute under Section 29 of I.D.Act, 1947, the

Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Kannangudi, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai

District, and the individual R.Ramesh, who was the Commissioner, Panchayat

Union, Kannangudi. The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Sivagangai was also

directed to file a complaint before the Judicial Magistrate at Devakottai under

Section 29 of I.D.Act, 1947 and report the result of the prosecution to the

Government and the Commissioner of Labour. It is thus seen that the order of the

learned Single Judge had been put into effect by passing of the aforementioned

Government Order dated 26.09.2019. The second respondent in the writ petition

should have challenged this particular Government Order. However, he had not

challenged this Government Order. The fact that the Government Order had been

passed had also not been disclosed in the grounds raised in the writ appeal. The

writ appeal had been presented before the Registry on 25.10.2019, after the

passing of the Government Order.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:32:52 am )

3. We are informed that subsequent to a complaint filed as directed in

the aforementioned Government Order, the complaint had also been taken

cognizance by the Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai in S.T.C.No.434 of 2019. The

appellants have to necessarily participate in the said proceedings if it is still

pending. Since the direction of the learned Single Judge had been complied with

in its entirety and that particular Government Order had not been challenged and

not actually been disclosed in the grounds in the writ appeal, and the present

status of S.T.C.No.434 of 2019 had also not been disclosed by the appellant

before us, we find that there are no grounds to interfere with the order of the

learned Single Judge, as the writ appeal has now become infructuous and

therefore, the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the

connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                              [C.V.K., J.]                [R.V., J.]
                                                                            03.09.2025

                 Index : Yes / No
                 Internet : Yes / No
                 PKN
                 Note: Before issuing the order copy,
                 necessary amendment will be carried

                 ____________





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:32:52 am )



                 out indicating the death of the
                 respondent, A.Sornam, and bringing on
                 record his legal representatives being
                 substituted in CMP(MD) No.7636 of
                 2025.




                 ____________





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis           ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:32:52 am )





                 To:
                 1.Commissioner
                 Panchayat Union
                 Kannankodi
                 Devakottai Taluk
                 Sivagangai District.

2.The Authority of the Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary Labour and Employment Department Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

3.Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage (TWAD) Board Represented by the Executive Engineer Weekly Market Road, Indian Bank Upstairs Sivagangai.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:32:52 am )

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

PKN

03.09.2025

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:32:52 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter