Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Singili vs The Official Liquidator
2025 Latest Caselaw 7710 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7710 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2025

Madras High Court

K.Singili vs The Official Liquidator on 10 October, 2025

Author: S.M.Subramaniam
Bench: S.M.Subramaniam, Mohammed Shaffiq
    2025:MHC:2341



                                                                                        O.S.A.No.316 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                        RESERVED ON                     : 25.09.2025

                                        PRONOUNCED ON                   : 10.10.2025

                                                         CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                           AND
                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

                                              O.S.A.No.316 of 2025
                                                      and
                                             C.M.P.No.23547 of 2025


                  K.Singili                                                           ... Appellant

                                                             Vs.
                  1.The Official Liquidator,
                    High Court, Madras
                    as a Provisional Liquidator of
                    M/s. Maxworth Orchards (India) Limited,
                    High Court, Corporate Bhawan, 2nd Floor,
                    No.29, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001
                    (In Provisional Liquidator)

                  2.Nagasaila Suresh                                                  ... Respondents

                  Prayer: Original Side Appeal has been filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of
                  the Original Side Rules, 1994 and Clause 15 of Letters Patent of 1865,
                  praying to set aside the Order and Decree dated 29.01.2025 passed in
                  Company Application No.579 of 2022 in C.A.No.169 of 2022 in C.P.No.57
                  of 1998.




                  Page 1 of 10




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )
                                                                                        O.S.A.No.316 of 2025

                                  For Appellant                 : Mr.Rajesh.R
                                                                  For Mr.Nanchill.J.Rajkumar


                                  For R1                        : Ms.Ambili.B
                                                                  Deputy Official Liquidator



                                                   JUDGMENT

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

This Original Side Appeal in O.S.A.No.316 of 2025 is directed against

the Order and Decree dated 29.01.2025 passed by the learned Single

Judge in Company Application No.579 of 2022 in C.A.No.169 of 2022 in

C.P.No.57 of 1998, whereby the application was dismissed by declaring

that the sale deeds in favour of the respective applicants are void and that

the mutation of revenue records on such basis is also void. The learned

Single Judge further directed the Official Liquidator to take all necessary

measures to mutate the title and revenue records in terms of the order.

2. The appellant have purchased the lands comprised in S.Nos.4/2,

(1.48 Acres) 4/3, (1.80 Acres), 4/4 (1.26 Acres), 4/5 (0.86 Acres), 5/1A

(1.40

Acres), 5/1B (0.94 Acres), 5/6A (0.89 Acres) 5/6B (0.82 Acres) 19/1 (5.84

Acres), by way of sale deed No.915 of 2019, and the lands comprised in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )

S.Nos.6/1A (0.37 Acres), 6/1B (0.73 Acres), 6/1C (1.04 Acres) 6/2 (0.90

Acres) 6/3 (0.85 Acres), 6/5 (0.84 Acres), 6/6 (1.72 Aces), 8/2 (1.05 Acres),

8/4 (0.33 Acres) 8/5 (0.22 Acres), 8/6 (0.77 Acres), 8/7 (0.77 Acres), 8/8

(1.44 Acres), and 8/9 (0.73 Acres), by way of sale deed No.916 of 2019,

and the lands comprised in S.Nos.19/3A (0.27 Acres), 19/3C (0.27 Acres),

and 5/8 (1.87 Acres), by way of sale deed No.3485 of 2020, and the lands

comprised in S.No.19/2C (1.01 Acres), by way of sale deed No.4162 of

2021, covered under Patta nos.853, 896, 897 898 and 965, to the extent of

30.655 acres of land, situate in Thimmapuram village, Arupukottai Taluk,

Virudhunagar District, and have constructed a house in Survey Nos.6/6 &

8/9 of Thimmapuram Village, Arupukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District for

residential purpose and residing in the same.

3. The appellant came to know through the local villagers by the

second week of July 2022, that his properties have been included in an

auction sale notice dated 07.05.2022 issued by the 1* Respondent pursuant

to the order of the High Court, Madras dated 29.04.2022 in C.A.No.169 of

2022 in C.P.No.57 of 1998, and the appellant's properties was found in the

Serial Nos. 5, to 10, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 56, 58 to 63, 102,

105, 107, of Annexure, under the caption “Project : Maxworth-

Thimmapuram - M - Extension; Village: Thimmapuram.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )

4. Hence, the appellant approached this Court by way of C.A

No.579/2022, to stay all consequential proceedings of the auction sale

dated 15.6.2022, conducted pursuant to the sale notice dated 07.05.2022,

issued by the official liquidator/1st respondent in C.A.No.169/2022, in C.P

No.57 of 1998, and all consequential proceedings in respect of the

appellant's properties shown in Serial Nos.35, to 10, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24,

26, 27, 29, 30, 56, 58 to 63, 102, 105, 107, of the Annexure, was dismissed

on 29.01.2025, by the learned Single Judge.

5. The respondents deny the claim of the applicant and wish to place

on record the Maxworth Orchards (India) Limited (hereinafter called “the

Company”) acquired about 288.325 acres of land in Thimmapuram Village,

Kariapatti Taluk in Virudhunagar District and paid sale consideration from

the fund of the company to the original farmers and obtained registered

power of attorneys in favour of employees of the company i.e

A.Venkatesan, G.M.Selvaraj, K.Narayanan. The possession of entire land

of 288.325 acres was taken over by the Company in 1996, conducted

revenue survey, plotting of the land in the form of 1 acre, 1/2 acre, 1/4 acre

and created provision for infrastructure in Max - Thimmapuram -M and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )

Extension project. The possession of the land has been with the company

since 1996 and company received deposit from customers to an extent of

139.25 acres and the Company registered sale deeds in favour of 165

customers to an extent of 94.50 acres and entered into maintenance

agreement for orchard development with customers. Unfortunately, before

the land could be registered in favour of other customers who paid deposits

to the company all sale transactions were brought to a standstill on account

of new regulations of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and

thereafter company went into Liquidation.

6. The Official Liquidator brought for auction sale 182.165 acres and

auction was completed on 15.06.2022 and maximum bid was received for

Rs.3,40,00,000 from one M/s.Damodhar Techno Systems Private Limited.

7. The point that arises for consideration is whether dispositions of

company properties are liable to be validated after the commencement of

winding up of the company under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act.

8. The appellant herein is asserting title over 30.655 acres in the

survey numbers described in the Judge's summons on the basis of four

sale deeds executed by the respective land owners (sale deeds bearing

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )

Document Nos.915 of 2019 and 916 of 2019, both dated 27.03.2019, sale

deed bearing Document No.3485 of 2020, dated 24.12.2020 and sale deed

bearing Document No.4162 of 2021 dated 11.01.2021). Reliance was also

placed on three of the sale deeds each dated 18.03.2019, under which the

predecessors-in-title of the appellant acquired the lands.

9. The learned Single Judge has correctly held that no document

antecedent to 18.03.2019 has been placed on record. Therefore even the

earliest purchases by the predecessors-in-title of the appellant were after

the commencement of the winding up of the Company.

10. The findings of the learned Single Judge also shows that the

respondent company had placed on record the parent documents, under

which the said original Land owners acquired title. Other relevant

documents evidencing the execution of the power of attorney in favour of

ex-employees of the company, the availability of receipts evidencing the

payment of consideration for purchase of significant portions of the lands

claimed by K. Singili and the custody of the original powers of attorney and

the parent documents with the company, the Company has established

ownership over these lands.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )

11. The learned counsel for the appellant had placed reliance on

Suraj Lamps and Industries Private Itd vs State of Haryana-I1, and

Suraj Lamps and Industries Private Itd vs State of Haryana-II 2. The

Hon'ble Supreme Court has placed exception on genuine transaction by

way of power of attorney including in favour of developer as recorded in

para 26 and 27 of the said judgement. This was also reiterated in

Ghanshyam vs Yogendra Rathi3.

12. The learned Single Judge has rightly relied on Section 536(2) of

the Companies Act. The said section reads as follows:

“In the case of a winding up by (the tribunal), any disposition of the property (including actionable claims) of the company, and any transfer of shares in the company or alteration in the status of its members, made after the commencement of the winding up, shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, be void.”

13. It is crystal clear from the contents of the section aforementioned

that after commencement of winding up of company any disposition of

property of the company shall be void unless the Court otherwise orders.

The appellant is relying upon sale deeds executed in the year 2019 and the

1 (2009) 7 SCC 363 2 (2012) 1 SCC 656 3 (2023) 7 SCC 361

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )

sale deed in favour of the immediate predecessor was also executed in

2019. There is also no other antecedent parent document in favour of the

predecessor-in-title. Also, on application of Section 536(2) of the

Companies Act, 1956, to the present case, the sale deed in favour of the

appellant was made after the date of order of winding up and hence the

sale transaction is void. Therefore the learned Single Judge has rightly

dismissed the application.

14. This Court is of the opinion that the learned Single Judge after

perusing the relevant materials on record has passed the Order dated

29.01.2025, which is in consonance with the established principles of

Company law.

15. For all the reasons stated above, the Original Side Appeal stands

dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                            [S.M.S., J.]      [M.S.Q., J .]
                                                                                      10.10.2025

                  Index : Yes
                  Speaking order
                  Neutral Citation : Yes

                  Jeni






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )





                  To

                  The Official Liquidator,
                  High Court, Madras
                  as a Provisional Liquidator of
                  M/s. Maxworth Orchards (India) Limited,
                  High Court, Corporate Bhawan, 2nd Floor,
                  No.29, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001
                  (In Provisional Liquidator)









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis           ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )




                                                                   S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
                                                                                  and
                                                                  MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

                                                                                               Jeni









                                                                                      10.10.2025









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 01:33:35 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter