Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kadar Mydeen vs Parvathy
2025 Latest Caselaw 4381 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4381 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2025

Madras High Court

Kadar Mydeen vs Parvathy on 25 March, 2025

Author: J.Nisha Banu
Bench: J.Nisha Banu, S.Srimathy
                                                                                       W.A(MD)No.699 of 2025


                      BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 25.03.2025

                                                        CORAM :

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
                                                   and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

                                            W.A(MD)No.699 of 2025
                                                   and
                                           CMP(MD)No.4886 of 2025

                1. Kadar Mydeen
                2. Diwan Oli
                3. Rajila
                4. Saiyath Thaslim                                                       ... Appellants

                                                              vs.
                1. Parvathy

                2. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                Represented by its Chairman,
                Electricity Department,
                10th Floor, NPKRR Maligai,
                144, Anna Salai,
                Chennai - 600 002.

                3. The Superintending Engineer,
                TANGEDCO, Shenkottai,
                Tenkasi District.

                4. The Assistant Executive Engineer,
                TANGEDCO, Shenkottai,
                Tenkasi District.



                1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 04:26:01 pm )
                                                                                                W.A(MD)No.699 of 2025


                5. Karuppasamy                                                               ... Respondents


                                  PRAYER : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters
                Patent, against the order dated 30.01.2025 made in W.P(MD)No.3877 of
                2023.


                                  For Appellants       : Mr.K.Navaneetharaja
                                  For R2               : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia
                                                               Special Government Pleader
                                  For R3 & R4          : Mr.S.Dheenadhayalan, standing counsel


                                                           JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.)

This writ appeal is filed against the order dated 30.01.2025

made in W.P(MD)No.3877 of 2023.

2. The facts leading to filing of this appal are as follows:

While the 1st respondent's husband, viz., Krishna Thevar, was

searching for goats on 28.07.2022, went to the land belonging to the

appellants managed by the 5th respondent, he got electrocuted in the

electric wire set up by the appellants for the purpose of hunting wild

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 04:26:01 pm )

boar and died. On the complaint of the writ petitioner, F.I.R has been

registered in Crime No.238 of 2021 for the offences under Section304(A)

I.P.C and Section 135(1)(e) of Electricity Act, 2003 as against the 5th

respondent. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed

and the same was taken cognizance in S.C.No.6 of 2024 on the file of the

District Sessions Court, Tenkasi. The 5th respondent is now facing the

trial. Hence, the 1st respondent / writ petitioner filed writ petition

seeking compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- for the demise of her husband

due to electrocution. The Writ Court though found that the appellants

illegally fenced the wire to hunt the wild boar and there was no

negligence on the part of the respondents 2 to 4, considering the fact that

since the 5th respondent was facing trial, without letting in any evidence,

the quantum of compensation cannot be fixed in the writ petition,

awarded interim compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- payable to the 1st

respondent. Aggrieved by the said order, the owner of the lands /

appellants have filed this appeal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 04:26:01 pm )

3. Though the learned counsel for the appellants made

arguments on the merits of the case that the entire case of the 1 st

respondent was based on disputed facts, we are not inclined to accept

the same since the Writ Court considering the fact that the 5th

respondent is facing trial, has only awarded interim compensation of Rs.

5,00,000/-. Apart from that, the Writ Court has also granted liberty to

the 1st respondent to file a suit for compensation.

4. As rightly held by the Writ Court, the quantum of

compensation can be fixed by the trial Court after considering all the

evidence let in on either side. Therefore, in exercise of the discretionary

jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Writ

Court has awarded interim compensation pending the criminal case.

We do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the Writ Court.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. The appellants

are directed to pay the interim compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- as directed

by the Writ Court in two instalments. The appellants shall pay Rs.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 04:26:01 pm )

2,50,000/- on or before 15.04.2025 to the 1st respondent either by way of

Demand Draft or through RTGS and the balance amount of Rs.

2,50,000/- shall be paid on or before 15.05.2025. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                  [J.N.B, J.]        [S.S.Y, J.]
                                                                          25.03.2025
                Index            : Yes / No
                Neutral Citation : Yes / No
                bala

                To

                1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                Represented by its Chairman,
                Electricity Department,
                10th Floor, NPKRR Maligai,
                144, Anna Salai,
                Chennai - 600 002.

                2. The Superintending Engineer,
                TANGEDCO, Shenkottai,
                Tenkasi District.

                3. The Assistant Executive Engineer,
                TANGEDCO, Shenkottai,
                Tenkasi District.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis         ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 04:26:01 pm )



                                                                            J.NISHA BANU, J.
                                                                                      AND
                                                                              S.SRIMATHY, J.

                                                                                             bala




                                                                        JUDGMENT MADE IN

                                                                           DATED : 25.03.2025







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 04:26:01 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter