Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Chairman And Managing Director vs M.M. Mohiuddin
2025 Latest Caselaw 3661 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3661 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2025

Madras High Court

The Chairman And Managing Director vs M.M. Mohiuddin on 6 March, 2025

Author: S.M.Subramaniam
Bench: S.M.Subramaniam
    2025:MHC:649


                                                                                                   W.A.No.92 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 06.03.2025

                                                          CORAM :

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                     AND
                                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

                                                  W.A.No.92 of 2024

                     1. The Chairman and Managing Director
                        TANGEDCO, No.825, Link Road
                        Anna Salai, Triplicane, Chennai 600 002

                     2. The Chief Engineer
                        TANGEDCO Distribution/Chennai North Region
                        Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002

                     3. The Executive Engineer
                        O & M/Anna Nagar North
                        TANGEDCO, Chennai 600 040

                     4. The Assistant Executive Engineer
                        TANGEDCO, O & M/Anna Nagar
                        CEDC West, 5th Street, H Block
                        Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040                       ..          Appellants

                                                                v.

                     1. M.M. Mohiuddin
                        S/o.S.M.Darwaish Mohiuddin
                       Old No.97, New No.37, 3rd Main Road
                       R Block, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040

                     ____________
                     Page 1 of 11


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )
                                                                                                      W.A.No.92 of 2024

                     2. Mrs.Shameem Mohiuddin
                        Old No.97, New No.37, 3rd Main Road
                        R Block, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040
                        both rep.by Power of Attorney P.Kruthivas
                        S/o E.Panneerselvam, Director
                        M/s Pushkar Properties Private Limited
                        Flat No.1-A, Pushkar's K.V.Residency
                        Old No.3, New No.51, F Block
                        2nd Main Road, Anna Nagar East
                        Chennai 600 102                         ..                          Respondents

                           Memorandum of Grounds of Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the
                     Letters Patent against the order dated 24.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.19383
                     of 2020.

                                       For Appellants        ::       Mr.P.Kumaresan
                                                                      Additional Advocate General
                                                                      assisted by Ms.Sindhuza M.S
                                                                      for Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh

                                       For Respondents ::             Mr.D.Stephen


                                                          JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.)

Under assail is the order dated 24.07.2023 passed in Writ Petition

No.19383 of 2020. The official respondents in the writ petition are the

appellants before this Court.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

2. The private respondents have instituted writ proceedings

challenging the charges demanded by TANGEDCO for providing electricity

service connections for the 12 dwelling units constructed by the

respondents.

3. The writ Court allowed the writ petition on the ground that the

charges demanded from the building contractors are exorbitant and directed

the appellant-TANGEDCO to refund a sum of Rs.31,54,390/- from the

deposit made by the respondents i.e., Rs.32,65,990/-.

4. Mr.P.Kumaresan, learned Additional Advocate General appearing

on behalf of the appellants would mainly contend that the description of

charges as demanded by the TANGEDCO is in accordance with the

provisions of the Electricity Act and Regulations. TANGEDCO is

empowered to collect the expenses met by the authorities for providing

electricity service connections to the consumers. When the Act and

Regulations permit the TANGEDCO to collect the expenses, the writ Court

has erroneously issued a direction to refund the deposit already made by the

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

respondents for providing electricity service connections to the 12 dwelling

units constructed by them.

5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents would

oppose by stating that the charges collected are not in consonance with the

ratio laid down by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission.

TANGEDCO has charged exorbitantly over and above the expenses met by

the authorities. Thus the learned Judge is right in issuing a direction to

refund the amount already deposited by the respondents for providing

electricity service connections.

6. This Court considered the submissions made between the parties to

the lis. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission in the case of

Mrs.Tara Murali v. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation

Limited (TANGEDCO) and others (M.P.No.2 of 2021 dated 9.11.2021)

elaborately considered the issue relating to service connection charges. The

Regulatory Commission considered the provisions of the Electricity Act and

the Regulations framed thereunder including the Electricity Distribution

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

Code. In paragraph 8.7, the Commission, referring to the provisions of the

Electricity Act and the Electricity Distribution Code, held as follows:-

“8.7. Section 46 (Power to recover expenditure) of the Electricity Act 2003 enables the Commission as follows:

“The State Commission may, by regulations, authorize a distribution licensee to charge from a person requiring a supply of electricity in pursuance of section 43 any expenses reasonably incurred in providing any electric line or electrical plant used for the purpose of giving that supply.”

8.8. Under Chapter 7: “Recovery of Charges” of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, the regulation 44 reads as follows:

“44. The Licensees are entitled to collect the charges from a person requiring supply of electricity any expenses reasonably incurred in providing any electrical line or electrical plant used for the purpose of giving that supply. These charges have also to be reviewed either periodically or at times of an urgent need for a revision. The consumers are liable to pay such charges as applicable and at the rates specified by the Commission from time to time through separate orders/ notifications. The various charges to be collected are furnished in the following clauses.

45(1) : Service Connection Charges: Regarding the recovery relating to service connection charges:

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

(i) For connecting up an installation, the Licensee shall be entitled to charge the consumer the actual cost of materials upto meter board, labour, transport plus overhead charges.

(ii) Extension, improvement or alteration to service lines to meet any additional demand will be charged on the same basis. In each case, the consumer will be furnished with an estimate of the cost of the work and this amount is payable in advance. On completion of the work, a bill for the actual amount payable will be forwarded to the consumer and any difference shall be paid by the consumer or will be refunded by the Licensee as the case may be.

(iii) The estimate for service connection charges may also include the service connection charges for metering referred to in regulation 45(2). The Licensee shall give due credit for the materials if any supplied by the consumers.

(2) Service connection charges for metering. The licensee is authorized to collect service connection charges for metering.

46. Meter Security Deposit: The Licensee is authorized to collect security for the price of meter from LT/HT consumers at the rates specified by the Commission from time to time and enter into an agreement for hiring of the meter. The Licensee may permit the consumer to install his/her own meter. However, it shall be calibrated by the Licensee.

Note : -

1. The above rate shall also apply to L.T.Temporary Supply.

2. Interest is payable on the above deposit at the rate specified by the Commission from time to time. The deposit shall be refunded after termination of service agreement, as per rules.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

3. If a consumer elects to purchase his own meter, he is not required to pay Meter Security Deposit.

47. Development Charges: The Licensee is authorized to collect development charges from LT/HT consumers at the rates specified by the Commission from time to time.

Note:— (1) The above development charges (one time payment) shall be collected from all applicants both for new and additional loads.

(2) For additional loads applied in the existing service the same rates are applicable.

(3) In case of conversions from Single Phase to Three Phase the difference in the development charges shall be collected provided the initial development charges were paid while availing Single Phase Service.

(4) One fourth of the development charges shall be applied to temporary supplies.

48. Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) :The Licensee is authorized to collect Earnest Money Deposit from all applicants for HT and LT industrial applicants at the rates specified by the Commission from time to time. This will be adjusted against the quantum of initial Security Deposit payable by the applicants before availing supply.

49. Security Deposit :The Licensee is authorized to collect initial security deposit at the rates specified by the Commission from time to time. Wherever Earned Money Deposit has been adjusted against the initial security deposit the balance if any will be collected from the applicants before giving supply”.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

7. Regulation 45(1) of the Electricity Distribution Code speaks about

the service connection charges. Sub-clause (i) denotes that for connecting of

any installation, the licensee shall be entitled to charge the consumer the

actual cost of materials upto meter board, labour, transport plus overhead

charges. Sub-clause (iii) stipulates that the estimate for service connection

charges may also include the service connection charges for metering

referred to in regulation 45(2). The licensee shall give due credit for the

materials if any supplied by the consumers. Various other charges

admissible under the Act and the Code are also considered by the

Regulatory Commission.

8. Perusal of the description of charges demanded by TANGEDCO in

the case of the respondents are in consonance with the provisions of the

Electricity Act and the Electricity Distribution Code. If at all any

discrepancy in the matter of assessment or otherwise, the respondents ought

to have approached the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum constituted

under Regulation 18 of the Electricity Supply Code. The Consumer

Grievance Redressal Forum consisting of expert members, will be in a

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

better position to assess the correctness of the charges demanded by

TANGEDCO authorities. Contrarily the High Court, in exercise of the

powers of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

cannot adjudicate the disputed facts relating to certain technical assessments

and such matters are to be left to the experts for forming a final opinion.

The factual findings made by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum and

the Ombudsman thereafter would be of greater assistance to the writ Court

to exercise the powers of judicial review in an effective manner. Thus the

writ petitions filed challenging such nature of demands are not entertainable

in normal circumstances and in exceptional cases, where there is a glaring

mistake, then, the writ Court would be in a position to intervene and grant

necessary relief(s).

9. In the present case, the writ order impugned is bereft of relevant

provisions of the Act and the Code. Thus this Court is inclined to interfere.

Granting liberty to the respondents to approach the Consumer Grievance

Redressal Forum and thereafter, if aggrieved, to the Ombudsman, the

impugned writ order dated 24.07.2023 in Writ Petition No.19383 of 2020 is

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

set aside and the writ appeal stands allowed. The respondents, in the event

of approaching the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, the period in

which the writ proceedings and writ appeals are pending before this Court is

to be taken into account to condone the delay. Consequently, C.M.P.No.519

of 2024 is closed. No costs.

                     Index : yes                                            (S.M.S.,J.)   (K.R.S.,J.)
                     Neutral citation : yes                                         06.03.2025

                     ss

                     To

                     1. The Chairman and Managing Director
                        TANGEDCO, No.825, Link Road
                        Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002

                     2. The Chief Engineer

TANGEDCO Distribution/Chennai North Region Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002

3. The Executive Engineer O & M/Anna Nagar North TANGEDCO, Chennai 600 040

4. The Assistant Executive Engineer TANGEDCO, O & M/Anna Nagar CEDC West, 5th Street, H Block Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

AND K.RAJASEKAR,J.

ss

06.03.2025

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/03/2025 06:41:42 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter