Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Karthikeyan vs S.Selvi
2025 Latest Caselaw 567 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 567 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2025

Madras High Court

S.Karthikeyan vs S.Selvi on 5 June, 2025

Author: D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Bench: D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
                                                                                              Crl.A.No.747 of 2011


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 05.06.2025

                                                           CORAM

                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

                                                 Crl.A.No.747 of 2011

              S.Karthikeyan                                                              ... Appellant
                                                                Vs.
              S.Selvi                                                 ... Respondent
              PRAYER : Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of Code of Criminal
              Procedure, pleased to set aside the judgment dated 10.08.2011 passed in
              C.C.No.443 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate No.2,
              Coimbatore, acquitting the respondent herein.

                                      For Appellant         :     M/s.K.Govi Ganesan
                                      For Respondents       :     Not ready in Notice



                                                       JUDGMENT

This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Judicial

Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.443 of 2010 dated 10.08.2011. By the

said judgment, the respondent herein was acquitted for the offence under Section

138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/06/2025 08:29:27 pm )

2.Heard Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, the learned counsel for the appellant.

3.The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the complainant

is involved in selling of spare parts under the name and style of M/s.Extreme

Computers. While so, the accused who was the owner of a Commercial Complex

promised to let out a shop to the complainant. Accordingly, part advance amount

was given by the complainant to the accused as cash and the balance by way of a

cheque. However, the accused did not rent out the said premises and agreed to

return the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- along with interest. Accordingly, in

discharge of the said liability, the subject matter cheque was issued for a sum of

Rs.4,13,500/- which upon presentation with the bank returned, dishonoured and

hence the complaint. The trial Court as such ought not to have acquitted the

accused especially in the absence of any contra evidence on behalf of the accused.

The complainant is entitled for the benefit of presumption.

4.I have considered the said submission made by the learned counsel for

the appellant and perused the material records of the case.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/06/2025 08:29:27 pm )

5.The trial Court after considering the case of the complainant had

considered the fact that the son of the accused was conducting a business under

the name and style of M/s.Limbix Infotech and Limbix Technology and there has

been transactions between the complainant and the said concern. In the same, the

accused was also a director and therefore, a cheque was issued by him with

reference to the said transactions. Since, it is not even mentioned as to on what

date the amount was given by the complainant and no rental agreement receipt

was also given, after appraising the evidence in detail, the trial Court has come to

a finding, that to the level of preponderance of probability, the accused has

rebutted the presumption. Once the same has been rebutted in the absence of any

further proof relating to the payment of advance or the transaction relating to the

leasing out of the shop, the trial Court has held that the complainant has not

proved the case and acquitted the accused. A detailed appraisal of evidence has

been undertaken by the trial Court by considering the various documents that

were marked as exhibits, especially Ex.A7 and also the reply notice and the cross

examination of the complainant and arrived at a finding that there seems to be

other commercial transaction between the parties. However, there does not seem

to be any evidence relating to the leasing out of the shop. This Court in an appeal

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/06/2025 08:29:27 pm )

against acquittal cannot upturn the findings unless the finding is perverse in

nature. In view thereof, finding no merits, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed.

05.06.2025

ep

Neutral citation : Yes/No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/06/2025 08:29:27 pm )

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

ep To

The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore.

05.06.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/06/2025 08:29:27 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter