Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hatsun Agro Products Ltd vs M/S.Pohieer Dairy Private Limited
2025 Latest Caselaw 3000 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3000 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2025

Madras High Court

Hatsun Agro Products Ltd vs M/S.Pohieer Dairy Private Limited on 19 February, 2025

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
                                                                       C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.149 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 19.02.2025

                                                      CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                          C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.149 of 2024
                                          and O.A.Nos.577 & 578 of 2024
                                          and A.Nos.4196 & 4197 of 2024


                     Hatsun Agro Products Ltd.,
                     Represented by its Authorized Signatory Mr.P.Vivek,
                     Having registered office at
                     No.41 (49), Janakiram Colony Main Road,
                     Janakiram Colony, Arumbakkam,
                     Chennai 600 106.                                             ... Plaintiff
                                                        -vs-


                     M/s.Pohieer Dairy Private Limited,
                     Having registered office at
                     Plot No.3, Rajam Nagar, 1st Street,
                     Sunnambu Kolathur Village,
                     Chennai 600 117.

                     And also having office at
                     No.5, Janani Nagar,
                     Kundrathur,
                     Chennai 600 069.                                          ... Defendant




                     PRAYER: Civil Suit (Commercial Division) filed under Order VII Rule 1

                     1/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.149 of 2024

                     CPC Read With Order IV Rule 1 of High Court O.S.Rules and Section 134

                     and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Section 7 of the Commercial

                     Courts Act, 2015, praying to grant a judgment and decree on the following

                     terms:-

                                  (A) For a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, by itself, its

                     servants, agents, legal representatives, distributors or any one claiming

                     through it from in any manner infringing the Plaintiff's registered trade dress

                     ARUN ICECREAM CASATTA SLICE by using the impugned trade dress

                     or any label or device or any other deceptively similar trade dress in any

                     manner whatsoever causing infringement to the plaintiff's registered trade

                     mark/dress as described in the schedule to the plaint.

                                  (B) For a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, by itself, its

                     servants, legal representatives, distributors or any one claiming through it

                     from in any manner whatsoever from passing off and enabling others to pass

                     off the defendant's business as that of the plaintiff's by using the impugned

                     trade dress or any label or device which is deceptively similar or identical to

                     the plaintiff's trade mark/dress in any manner whatsoever.

                                  (C) For a declaration that the plaintiff's trademark “ARUN” is a well-



                     2/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.149 of 2024

                     known mark as recognized under the Trade Marks Act 1999.

                                  (D) Directing the defendant to surrender to the plaintiff all the

                     products and stocks with the offending trade dress, labels, together with the

                     blocks, name boards, sign boards, etc., for destruction.

                                  (E) Directing the defendant to render true and faithful accounts of the

                     profits earned by it through the sale of the products bearing the offending

                     trade dress, labels and directing payment of such profits to the plaintiff.

                                  (F) Directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of

                     Rs.3,00,000 as damages for committing acts of infringement of trade dress

                     and passing off.

                                  For Plaintiff       : Mr.Surya Senthil
                                                        for M/s.Surana and Surana

                                  For Defendant       : M/s.P.Muthamizh Selvakumar, R.Manimaran

                                                            **********
                                                           JUDGMENT

In a suit seeking relief in respect of alleged infringement of the

plaintiff's registered trade dress and alleged passing off, the parties have

reached a settlement. The terms of settlement have been recorded in

Memorandum of Compromise dated 05.01.2025 signed by an authorized

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.149 of 2024

signatory of the plaintiff and a Director of the defendant. The terms of

compromise include an agreement that the suit be decreed as prayed for in

paragraph 44(A) and 44(B) of the plaint. The plaintiff has agreed to give up

the claims made in paragraph 44(C) to 44(G). I see no legal impediment in

decreeing the suit in terms of the said Memorandum of Compromise.

2. Therefore, C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.149 of 2024 is partly decreed in

terms of prayers in paragraph 44(A) and 44(B) of the plaint. The

Memorandum of Compromise shall form an integral part of the decree. In

view of the settlement, the parties shall bear their own costs. Consequently,

O.A.Nos.577 and 578 of 2024 and A.Nos.4196 and 4197 of 2024 are closed.

19.02.2025 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.149 of 2024

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

rna

C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.149 of 2024 and O.A.Nos.577 & 578 of 2024 and A.Nos.4196 & 4197 of 2024

19.02.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter