Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Sree Gokulam Chit And Finance ... vs M.Ramu
2025 Latest Caselaw 2700 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2700 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2025

Madras High Court

M/S. Sree Gokulam Chit And Finance ... vs M.Ramu on 12 February, 2025

Author: P.Velmurugan
Bench: P.Velmurugan
                                                                             Crl.A.No.1649 of 2024

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 12.02.2025

                                                         CORAM:

                                     THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                              Criminal Appeal No.1649 of 2024


                     M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co.(P) Limited,
                     Rep.by its Vice Chairman
                     Mr.V.C.Praveen,
                     Having Corporate Office at:
                     No.66, Arcot Road, Kodambakkam,
                     Chennai – 600 024,
                     Having Branch Office at :
                     Sree Sai Towers, 1064/8,
                     Post Office Road, Hosur – 635 109.                         ... Appellant

                                                           ..vs..

                     M.Ramu                                                     ... Respondent


                                  Criminal Appeal filed under Section 419 of BNSS, 2023, to call
                     for the records and judgment acquitting the respondent/accused in
                     S.T.C.No.23 of 2013 dated 21.08.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate,
                     Fast Track Court, Hosur and set aside the same.




                     Page No.1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 Crl.A.No.1649 of 2024




                                  For Appellant      :     Mr.L.Rajasekar

                                  For Respondents :        Mr.A.Balamurugan


                                                         JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgment passed in

S.T.C.No.23 of 2013, dated 21.08.2024 by the learned Judicial

Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur, by acquitting the respondent-

accused.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that after complying

with the legal requirements, the appellant-complainant filed a private

complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act before the

learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur against the

respondent-accused alleging that the respondent-accused, who is the

subscriber of the appellant-complainant chit group had issued a cheque

for Rs.10,39,895/-, dated 21.11.2012 drawn on M/s.City Union Bank

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ltd., Hosur Branch, to discharge his liability towards the chit outstanding

amount. When the said cheque was presented for realization, it was

returned as ''Funds Insufficient''. He further submitted that after filing of

the complaint, as per the settlement talks, the respondent-accused had

paid part payment of Rs.4,00,000/- to the appellant-complainant and the

same was informed to the trial Court and that the case was adjourned for

filing fresh proof affidavit on 06.08.2024. On 06.08.2024, the

complainant was present and the accused was absent and the complainant

had sought time for filing fresh proof affidavit and the case was

adjourned to 21.08.2024. However, the trial Court on 21.08.2024,

dismissed the complaint for non-prosecution by observing that in spite of

giving sufficient opportunities, the complainant has not proceed with the

case further. He further submitted that as per the settlement talks, the

accused made part payment to the complainant and that the complainant

with bona fide belief that the matter would be settled between them, the

complainant did not prosecute the case further. He further submitted that

all along from the year 2013 though the appellant-complainant had taken

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

all diligent steps to proceed with the case, the learned Magistrate

erroneously dismissed the complaint. Hence he seeks one more

opportunity to prosecute the complaint in S.T.C.No.23 of 2013.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-complainant

submitted that the complaint was filed in the year 2013 in S.T.C.No.23 of

2013 and the same is pending at the stage of trial from 02.05.2024.

When the matter was taken up for hearing 06.08.2024, the trial Court

adjourned the matter to 21.08.2024 on condition that if the complainant

is not proceeding with trial on 21.08.2024, the complaint will be

dismissed for non-prosecution. However, when the matter was taken up

on 21.08.2024, the complainant sought further time for commencing the

trial. However, the trial Court dismissed the complainant by observing

that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the complainant did not take

any effective steps to proceed with the case further.

4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. On a perusal of the records it is seen that pending complaint, the

respondent-accused paid part payment to the complainant and that the

trial Court adjourned the matter for filing fresh proof affidavit and trial

by 06.08.2024. On 06.08.2024, the complainant sought further time to

file fresh proof affidavit, hence the trial Court adjourned the matter to

21.08.2024 on condition that the trial should commence on 21.08.2024,

failing which, the case will be dismissed for non-prosecution. When the

matter was taken up for hearing on 21.08.2024, the appellant-

complainant sought further time to file proof affidavit and to

commencing the trial but the trial Court dismissed the complaint.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also

considering the submissions of both sides and also in the interest of

justice, the appellant-complainant herein can be given one more

opportunity to prosecute the case further. Therefore, the order dated

21.08.2024 in S.T.C.No.23 of 2013 passed by the learned Judicial

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur, is hereby set aside and hence, this

Criminal Appeal is allowed with the following conditions :

(i) The appellant-complainant shall file proof affidavit on or before

19.02.2025.

(ii) The respondent-accused is directed to complete the cross

examination on or before 21.02.2025.

(iii) The appellant-complainant is directed complete the evidence

on his side on or before 28.02.2025.

(iv) In case the respondent-accused wants to take evidence, he has

to complete the same on or before 07.03.2025.

(v) The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur, is hereby

directed to dispose of the case on merits and in accordance with law on

or before 28.03.2025 and file a compliance report before this Court on

01.04.2025.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Post the matter under the caption ''For Filing Compliance Report''

on 01.04.2025.

12.02.2025

Note : Issue Order Copy on 13.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms

To The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

ms

12.02.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter