Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Vetrivel vs The Tahsildhar
2025 Latest Caselaw 2340 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2340 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2025

Madras High Court

S.Vetrivel vs The Tahsildhar on 3 February, 2025

Author: M.Sundar
Bench: M.Sundar
                                                                                        W.P.No.3342 of 2025

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED : 03.02.2025

                                                              CORAM

                                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
                                                      and
                     THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI


                                                      W.P.No.3342 of 2025
                                                             and
                                                     W.M.P.No.3709 of 2025

                     S.Vetrivel
                     S/o.Shanmugam                                                         ...Petitioner

                                                                Vs
                     1.           The Tahsildhar
                                  Vandavasi Taluk
                                  Thiruvannamalai District.

                     2.           The Executive Officer
                                  Desur Town Panchayat
                                  Vandavasi Taluk
                                  Thiruvannamalai District.                         ...Respondents

                                  Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                     issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records and to quash
                     the impugned notice cum order 20.01.2025 bearing Na.Ka.No.237/2024
                     passed by the 2nd respondent as the same being arbitrary, against principle
                     of nature justice and contrary to provision of law and consequently,

                     Page Nos.1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       W.P.No.3342 of 2025

                     directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of petitioner
                     dated 25.01.2025 for passing necessary order.
                                        For Petitioner  :       Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram
                                        For Respondents :       Mr.T.K.Saravanan
                                                                Government Advocate



                                                           ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,]

Captioned 'Writ Petition' {hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity}

has been filed inter alia assailing a notice dated 20.01.2025 bearing

reference Na.Ka.No.273/2024 issued by R2 [The Executive Officer, Desur

Town Panchayat, Vandavasi Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District]' {hereinafter

'impugned notice for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity}.

2. Mr.Meenakshi Sundaram, learned counsel on record for writ

petitioner submits that the impugned notice has been issued under Sections

128(1)(b) and 128(2) of 'The Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998

(Act 9 of 1999)' (hereinafter 'TNULB Act' for the sake of convenience and

clarity) but it has not called upon the writ petitioner to show cause in seven

days. On the contrary, it directly calls upon the writ petitioner to remove

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

alleged encroachment is learned counsel's say.

3. Issue notice.

4. Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice

for both respondents and learned State Counsel submits, on instructions that

writ petitioner has responded to impugned notice vide communication dated

24.01.2025, the same will be treated as response / representation and orders

will be made by R2.

5. To be noted, Section 128 of TNULB Act reads as follows:

'128. Power to remove encroachment from public place. - (1) The Commissioner may, -

(a) remove without any notice any movable temporary structure, enclosure, stall, booth, any article whatsoever hawked, exposed or displayed for sale or any other thing whatsoever by way of encroaching street or public place or the [land belonging to or vested with the municipality] with the municipal limit;

(b) remove any immovable structure whether permanent or of temporary nature encroaching the street or public place or the [land belonging to municipality or vested with the municipality] within the municipal limit, after issuing a show cause notice for such removal, returnable within a period of seven days from the date of receipt thereof:

Provided that the Commissioner shall consider any

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

representation received within the time limit, before passing final orders.

(2) Whoever makes any encroachment in any land or space (not being private property) in any public street or any [land belonging to or vested with the municipality] within the municipal limit, shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to [fifty thousand rupees]:

Provided that the Court may, for any adequate or special reasons to be mentioned in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than one year.'

6. It is also to be noted that Section 128 of TNULB Act talks about

'Commissioner' and 'Commissioner' is defined under sub-section (7) of

Section 2 of TNULB Act and clause (b) of sub-section (7) of Section 2 of

TNULB Act makes it clear that R2 is 'Commissioner' within the meaning of

TNULB Act.

7. It is submitted by learned State Counsel that R2 will consider

24.01.2025 representation of the writ petitioner (in response to impugned

notice which has now been treated as 'Show Cause Notice' {'SCN'}) and

pass final orders under proviso to Section 128(1)(b) of TNULB Act as

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

expeditiously as the business of R2 permits but in any event, within four

weeks from today i.e., on or before 03.03.2025. We make it clear that a

copy of final order of R2 shall be duly served on writ petitioner under due

acknowledgment within five working days from the date of the order.

8. As the requirement to show cause the writ petitioner is satisfied,

captioned WP is disposed of as closed recording the stated position of

learned State Counsel. Though obvious, we make it clear that any coercive

action will be subject to / depending on final orders to be made by R2 vide

proviso to Section 128(1)(b) of TNULB Act.

9. We notice from the case file that a suit in 'O.S.No.75 of 2024 on the

file of Principal District Munsif Court, Vandavasi' {hereinafter 'said suit' for

the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity} has been filed by writ

petitioner. The said suit thus, pertains to land which is the subject matter of

impugned notice and R2 has been arrayed as D8 in the said suit. Though R2

has been added as D8, learned counsel submits that said suit is primarily

vide a complaint against private defendants D1 to D6 and therefore, de hors

the said suit or any orders thereat, writ petitioner will stand bound by final

orders to be made by R2.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Consequently, captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petition thereat is also

disposed of as closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                [M.S.,J.]                    [K.G.T.,J.]
                                                                            03.02.2025

                     Index : Yes / No
                     Neutral Citation : Yes / No
                     Speaking order / Non-speaking order


                     mk


                     To

                     1.           The Tahsildhar
                                  Vandavasi Taluk
                                  Thiruvannamalai District.

                     2.           The Executive Officer
                                  Desur Town Panchayat
                                  Vandavasi Taluk
                                  Thiruvannamalai District.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                                                      M.SUNDAR, J.,
                                                              and
                                    K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.,

                                                                       mk









                                                            03.02.2025







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter