Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Sunny vs The Director Of School Education
2025 Latest Caselaw 6327 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6327 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2025

Madras High Court

A.Sunny vs The Director Of School Education on 23 April, 2025

Author: Battu Devanand
Bench: Battu Devanand
                                                                                       W.P(MD)No.11327 of 2025

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 23.04.2025

                                                         CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

                                           W.P.(MD)No.11327 of 2025

                     A.Sunny                                                              ...Petitioner
                                                             Vs.

                     1.The Director of School Education,
                       Perasiriyar Anbazhagan Campus
                       DPI Complex, College Road,
                       Chennai – 600 006.

                     2.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       Kanyakumari District.

                     3.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu
                       Office of the Accountant General
                       361, Anna Salai, Teynampet
                       Chennai – 600 018.                                                  ...Respondents

                     Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents
                     herein to re-fix petitioner's pension by counting 50 % of petitioner's part-
                     time Vocational Instructor service between 01.04.1988 to 04.10.1996 and
                     disburse arrears of pension from 01.06.2024 onwards.




                     1




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )
                                                                                             W.P(MD)No.11327 of 2025




                                              For Petitioner           : Mr.E.V.N.Siva

                                              For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddarthan
                                                                Additional Government Advocate


                                                              ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus directing the

respondents herein to re-fix petitioner's pension by counting 50 % of

petitioner's part-time Vocational Instructor service between 01.04.1988 to

04.10.1996 and disburse arrears of pension from 01.06.2024 onwards.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was initially

appointed as Part Time Vocational Instructor at St.Aloysius Higher

Secondary School, Marthandanthurai on 01.04.1988 and his service was

regularized on 05.10.1996. On attaining the age of superannuation, the

petitioner retired from service on 31.05.2024. After his retirement, the

respondents has chosen to disburse pension only for the period of his

regularized service and failed to consider the period of service rendered

by the petitioner as Part Time Vocational Instructor from 01.04.1988 to

04.10.1996. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )

03.03.2025 to the respondents. But there was no response. Aggrieved by

the same, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. After prolonged correspondence, the Government of Tamil

Nadu issued G.O.Ms.No.712 dated 28.05.1990 and G.O.Ms.No.834

dated 23.09.1994, G.O.Ms.No.221 dated 15.07.1999 regularising the

services of Vocational Instructors.

4. It is the further case of the petitioner that the petitioner rendered

service for 36 years and 2 months i.e. from 01.04.1988 to 31.05.2024. In

the said spell, the period rendered after regularization comes to 27 years

and 7 months 27 days i.e. from 05.10.1996 to 31.05.2024 and the service

rendered in consolidated pay comes to 8 years & 6 months & 4 days i.e.

from 01.04.1988 to 04.10.1996. The services rendered in the regular time

scale of pay i.e. from 05.10.1996 to 31.05.2024 alone has been taken as

qualifying service, the services of 8 years & 6 months & 4 days in

consolidated pay for a period from 01.04.1988 to 04.10.1996 has not

been taken as qualifying service for pensionary benefits, which is

arbitrary and discriminatory.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )

5. The Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1702 of 2010,

dated 29.09.2010 held that the Vocational Instructors like the deceased

Government Servant are entitled for counting 50% of part time service

towards the pensionary benefits. In compliance of the said order, the

Government of Tamil Nadu passed G.O.Ms.No.130 dated 18.07.2013 and

G.O.Ms.No.134 dated 22.07.2013, which provides for counting of 50%

of service in part time vocational instructor post as qualifying service

towards the pensionay benefits, along with the regular service. In the said

Government Order, it is stated that since the employees covered under

above said Government Orders are Part Time Vocational Instructors, one

of the condition in G.O.Ms.No.408 dated 25.08.2009 is relaxed i.e., the

condition which says that employment should be for whole time. In this

case, the relaxation is necessary and he is entitled to count 50% of part

time service towards pensionary benefits as qualifying service.

6. The Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.359 of 2015 has

held that double part time vocational instructor's post is a full time

employment and the double part time vocational instructors are entitled

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )

to count 50% of service along with the regular service. A Division Bench

of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in W.A.(MD).No.392 of 2017

has held that the single and double part time vocational instructor has to

be treated equally and that the post of single part time is a full time

employment and the single and double part time vocational instructors

are entitled to count 50% of service rendered on consolidated pay along

with the regular service for the purpose of pensionary benefits. Hence,

the present Writ Petition.

7. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

8. Admittedly, the petitioner was appointed as Part Time Vocational

Instructor on 01.04.1988 and his services were regularized with effect

from 05.10.1996. He retired from service on attaining the age of

superannuation on 31.05.2024.

9. The issue involved in this Writ Petition is that as to whether the

petitioner is entitled to the benefit of 50% of services rendered as Part

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )

Time Vocational Instructor for the purpose of calculating qualifying

service for pensionary benefits or not.

10. In fact, the issue involved in this Writ Petition was already

dealt by this Court on several occasions and rendered judgments in

favour of the employees and those decisions had attained finality. The

Division Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 16.03.2015 in

W.A.No.359 of 2015 made a detailed analysis of the relevant

Government Orders and arrived at a conclusion that the Double Part

Time Vocational Instructors are entitled for 50% of the services rendered

by them and the same shall be counted for the purpose of computing

pension and other retirement benefits. In respect of Single Part Time

Vocational Instructors, a Division Bench of this Court by its judgment

dated 21.04.2017 in WA.(MD).No.392 of 2017 held that Single Part Time

Vocational Instructors should be treated equally with the double part time

teachers and all benefits that were given to the Double Part Time

Vocational Instructors should be extended to the Single Part Time

Vocational Instructors as well. The said decision has attained finality.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )

11. Having taken into consideration of the relevant facts,

Government Orders and judgments of this Court, a Division Bench of

this Court by its judgment dated 06.04.2018 in WA.Nos.882 of 2017 and

batch held that Part Time Vocational Instructors (either Single or Double

Part Time Vocational Instructors) are entitled for counting 50% of

services rendered by them for the purpose computing pension and other

retirement benefits. The said judgment has also attained finality.

12. In the present case also, the petitioner worked as Part Time

Vocational Instructor from 01.04.1988 to 04.10.1996 and thereafter, his

services were regularized with effect from 05.10.1996. Therefore, this

Court taking into consideration of the orders issued by the Government

in favour of the similarly situated persons, wherein 50% of the part time

service rendered by them was counted with regular service for the

purpose of pensionary benefits and also by following the judgments

rendered by several Division Benches on this aspect as stated supra,

holds that the respondents have to count 50% of the part time services

rendered by the petitioner with the regular service for the purpose of

pensionary benefits.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )

13. With the aforesaid observations, this Writ Petition is allowed

with the following directions:

The respondents are directed to count 50% of the services of

the petitioner for a period from 01.04.1988 to 04.10.1996 as Part

Time Vocational Instructor along with regular service from

05.10.1996 to 31.05.2024 as qualifying service and fix pensionary

benefits and grant arrears of pension and other pensionary benefits

to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order.

14. No costs.





                                                                                                       23.04.2025

                     Index : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     NCC      : Yes / No

                     SN









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )


                     To,

                     1.The Director of School Education,
                       Perasiriyar Anbazhagan Campus
                       DPI Complex, College Road,
                       Chennai – 600 006.

                     2.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       Kanyakumari District.

                     3.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu
                       Office of the Accountant General
                       361, Anna Salai, Teynampet
                       Chennai – 600 018.









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )


                                                                      BATTU DEVANAND, J.


                                                                                               SN









                                                                                      23.04.2025









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2025 08:40:14 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter