Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17791 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024
S.A.(MD) No.665 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.09.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.(MD) No.665 of 2012
and
M.P.(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2012
Thangaiah Thevar .. Appellant/2nd Respondent/
2nd Defendant
Vs.
1.Ramakrishnan .. 1st Respondent/Appellant/
Plaintiff
2.Tuticorin Panchayat Union,
Rep., through its Commissioner,
Kumaragiri Village, Pudukkottai,
Tuticorin Taluk, Tuticorin District. .. 2nd Respondent/
1st Respondent/1st Defendant
3.P.Mariappan .. 3rd Respondent/
3rd Respondent/3rd Defendant
4.Manickathai .. 4th Respondent/
4th Respondent/4th Defendant
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set
aside the judgment and decree dated 21.07.2011 made in A.S.No.87 of
2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin and cofirm the judgment and
_________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.(MD) No.665 of 2012
decree dated 23.06.2006 made in O.S.No.46 of 2004 on the file of the
Additional District Munsif Court, Tuticorin.
For Appellant : Mr.NA.Palaniyandi
For R2 : No appearance
Respondent-1 : Died
RR3 & 4 : Given up
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 30.08.2024, this
Court passed the following order:
“The 2nd defendant in O.S.No.46 of 2004 is the appellant challenging the judgment and decree in A.S.No.87 of 2008 passed by the Sub-Court, Tuticorin in and by which the learned Subordinate Judge has reversed the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Munsif, Tuticorin. The suit is one for declaration and injunction filed by the first respondent before this Court.
The second appeal has been dismissed against the first respondent and no steps have been taken to restore the same. It is seen that the 1st respondent died as early as in the year 2012 itself.
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
No representation for the appellant. Post 'for dismissal' on 06.09.2024.”
2. Today, in spite of the matter being listed under the caption “for
dismissal”, there is no representation for the appellant. Therefore, this
Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for default.
3. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
06.09.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes
abr
To
1.The Sub-Judge, Tuticorin.
2.The Additional District Munsif, Tuticorin.
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
P.T.ASHA, J.
abr
Dated: 06.09.2024
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!