Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19490 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2024
C.M.A.No.586 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
C.M.A.No.586 of 2022
and
C.M.P.No.4252 of 2022
S. Sundarraj
S/o.Late C.Sachidhanantham Achari ..Appellant
Vs.
V.G.Amutha
W/o.Sundarraj ..Respondent
Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of
Family Courts Act to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated
22.11.2021 made in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in H.M.O.P.No.1558 of 2019 on
the file of the learned Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr.N.Manoharan
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1/4
C.M.A.No.586 of 2022
JUDGMENT
(The judgment of the Court was delivered by J.Nisha Banu,J and R.Kalaimathi,J.)
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/
husband to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.11.2021 made
in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in H.M.O.P.No.1558 of 2019 on the file of the
learned Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore.
2. As per Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, an appeal against
the interlocutory application will not lie and an appeal will lie only as
against the judgment or order of the Family Court. Further, in the case of
G.V.N.S.Siva Prasad vs. V.Jyostna Devi made in C.M.A.No.1018 of
2022 dated 27.03.2024, the Division Bench of this Court, after referring
to the judgment of S.Menaka v. K.S.K. Nepolian Socraties and other
cases (Batch) reported in 2024:MHC:1405 (Neutral Citation of Madras
High Court) and 2024 Live Law (Mad) 126 held that as against the
interlocutory applications/ interim maintenance, only Civil Revision
Petition under 227 of the Constitution of India, would lie and not Civil
Miscellaneous Appeal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court
to withdraw this appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect
in the case bundle.
4. In the light of the aforesaid judgment and in view of the
endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil
Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file Civil
Revision Petition. On filing of the CRP, for the purpose of limitation, the
period spent in prosecuting the CMA shall be excluded.
5. If the learned counsel for the appellant requests for return of
certified copy of the impugned order, the same shall be returned to him
forthwith under due acknowledgement. No costs.
(J.N.B,J.) (R.K.M., J.)
Index : Yes / No 17.10.2024
Internet : Yes
vsi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
J. NISHA BANU, J.
and
R.KALAIMATHI, J.
vsi
To
The Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore.
17.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!