Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kaveri vs P. Andigounder
2024 Latest Caselaw 19426 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19426 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2024

Madras High Court

Kaveri vs P. Andigounder on 17 October, 2024

Author: R.Hemalatha

Bench: R. Hemalatha

                                                                                      CMA.No.977 of 2024


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED: 17.10.2024

                                                          CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

                                                     C.M.A.No.977 of 2024

                     1.Kaveri
                     2. Palaniappan
                     3. Tamilvani
                     4. Suthanthira Priya
                     5. Hemalatha                                              .... Appellants

                                                              vs.
                     1. P. Andigounder

                     2. M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited
                        Salem, Divisional Office No.1. T.P. Hub,
                        No.104-A, Ranga Building, Peramanur Main Road,
                        Near Four Roads, Peramanur, Salem.

                     3. P. Abrose                                   .       .. Respondents

                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                     Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Award dated 01.11.2022 in
                     M.C.O.P.558/2021 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                     Special District Court, Salem.


                                    For Appellants      : Mr. R. Navaneetha Krishnan
                                    R1 & R3             : No appearance
                                    For R2              : Mrs. R. Sreevidhya
                                                        JUDGMENT

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The appellants are the claimants in M.C.O.P.558/2021 on the

file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Court, Salem.

They filed the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,

seeking compensation of Rs.40,00,000/- for the death of one

Naveenkumar (son of claimants 1 and 2 and brother of claimants 3 to 5)

in a road accident that occurred on 21.11.2020.

2. The brief case of the appellants / claimants is as follows :

2.1. On 21.11.2020 Naveenkumar (since deceased) was riding a

two wheeler bearing Registration Number TN 30 X 7837 on Edappaddy-

Jalagandapuram Main Road and at about 22.00 hours, a speeding Maruthi

Omni Ambulance bearing Registration Number TN 30 BW 7405 hit his

two wheeler as a result of which he fell down and sustained injuries all

over his body. He was immediately rushed to Government Hospital,

Salem. However he succumbed to injuries on the next day.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3. According to the claimants, the rash and negligent driving of

the driver of the Maruthi Omni Ambulance bearing Registration Number

TN 30 BW 7405 belonging to the first respondent was the cause of the

accident and that since the said Ambulance was insured with the second

respondent, the United India Insurance Company Limited, Salem, the

owner and the insurer are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation

to them.

4. In the Tribunal the first respondent, the owner of the

Ambulance remained absent and was set ex parte. The second

respondent Insurance Company resisted the claim petition on all the

grounds available to the insurer under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles

Act. The claim petition against the third respondent was dismissed.

5. The Tribunal, after analysing the evidence on record fastened

negligence on the part of the driver of the Maruthi Omni Ambulance

bearing Registration Number TN 30 BW 7405. Since the driver of the

Ambulance did not possess a valid driving license on the date of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

accident, the Tribunal, vide its orders dated 01.11.2022, directed the

United India Insurance Company Limited to pay compensation of

Rs.11,45,000/- to the claimants together with interest at the rate of 7.5%

per annum from the date of the petition till the date of realisation in the

first instance and then recover the same from the owner of the Maruthi

Omni Ambulance bearing Registration Number TN 30 BW 7405, under

the same cause of action (pay and recover).

6. Aggrieved over the quantum of compensation awarded by the

Tribunal, the claimants have filed the present appeal under Section 173

of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

7. Heard Mr. R. Navaneetha Krishnan, learned counsel

appearing for the appellants and Mrs. R. Sreevidhya learned counsel

appearing for the second respondent Insurance Company.

8. Mr. R. Navaneetha Krishnan, learned counsel appearing for

the appellants contended that the deceased was owning a power loom

earning a sum of Rs.30,000/- per month. However, the Tribunal fixed

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the notional monthly income of the deceased only as Rs.10,000/- including

future prospects. He therefore, prayed for enhancement of compensation.

9. Per contra, Mrs.R.Sreevidhya, learned counsel appearing for

the second respondent/Insurance Company contended that the Award

passed by the Tribunal is based on the well laid down principles of law

which were in vogue at the time of passing of the order and therefore, the

same need not be disturbed in the present appeal.

10. According to the claimants, Naveenkumar (deceased) was

aged 28 years and was owning a Power Loom earning a sum of

Rs.30,000/- per month. In the absence of satisfactory income proof, the

Tribunal fixed the notional monthly income of the deceased as Rs.10,000/-

including future prospects. Considering the year of accident and the age of

the deceased, this Court fixes the notional monthly income of the deceased

as Rs.16,000/-. As per the decision of the Supreme Court of India in

National Insurance Co. vs Pranay sethi and others reported in 2017 (2)

TNMAC 601, 40% is added towards future prospects of the deceased.

Since the deceased died as a bachelor, 1/2 is deducted towards his

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

personal expenses. The proper multiplier to be adopted in the instant case

is 17 as per the decision rendered in Sarla Verma and others vs. Delhi

Transport Corporation and another reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121.

Calculation

Notional Income = Rs.16,000/-

40% Future Prospects = Rs.22,400/-

After 1/2 deduction = Rs.11,200/-

Loss of dependency

= Rs.11,200/- x 12 x 17

= Rs.22,84,800/-

In addition to that the claimants are entitled to get Rs.2,00,000/- (40,000

x 5 ), Rs.15,000/- and Rs.15,000/- for 'loss of Consortium', 'loss of Estate'

and 'Funeral Expenses' respectively as per the decision in National

Insurance Co. vs Pranay sethi and others (cited supra).

10.1. The enhanced amount under the different heads are

detailed hereunder:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.No. Head Amount granted by this court (Rs.)

1. Loss of dependency 22,84,800/-

2. Loss of consortium 2,00,000/-

(Rs.40,000/- x 5)

3. Funeral expenses 15,000/-

4. Loss of Estate 15,000/-

Total 25,14,800/-

This amount shall carry interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the

date of claim petition till the date of deposit.

11. In the result,

i. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs.

ii. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to

Rs.25,14,800/-.

iii. The appellants / claimants are directed to pay court fee for the

enhanced compensation amount, if any, within a period of four

weeks from the date of this order and the Registry is directed to

draft the decree only after receipt of the Court fee.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

iv. The second respondent, the United India Insurance Company

Limited, Salem, is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation

amount of Rs. 25,14,800/- (less the amount already deposited)

together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date

of claim petition till the date of deposit, in the first instance, to the

credit M.C.O.P.558/2021 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Special District Court, Salem, within a period of four

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order/uploading of

this order, and then recover the same from the owner of the

Maruthi Omni Ambulance bearing Registration Number TN 30 BW

7405, under the same cause of action (pay and recover). The ratio of

apportionment made by the Tribunal shall be kept intact.

v. On such deposit being made, the claimants are at liberty to

withdraw the same after filing proper petition for withdrawal.

vi. The appellants/claimants are not entitled to claim any interest for

the period of delay of 310 days in filing this appeal as per the orders

of this Court dated 22.03.2024 in C.M.P. No.28258 of 2023.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

17.10.2024

Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order bga

To

1. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Court, Salem.

2. M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited Salem, Divisional Office No.1. T.P. Hub, No.104-A, Ranga Building, Peramanur Main Road, Near Four Roads, Peramanur, Salem.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.HEMALATHA, J.

bga

17.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter