Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19282 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2024
Crl.O.P.No.24792 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:04.10.2024
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Crl.O.P.No.24792 of 2024
and
Crl.M.P.No.13898 of 2024
1.Dhanush @ Dhanush Raj
2.Rohith @ Penikalapati Rohith
3.Sudharsan @ Sudharsanam
4.Madhan @ Madhan Kumar .. Petitioners/
Accused No.1 to 4
/versus/
1.State of Tamil Nadu rep.by
The Inspector of Police,
Maraimalai Nagar Police Station,
Chennai.
Crime No.407 of 2024 ..1st Respondent
2.P.Yoga Selvan .. 2nd Respondent/
Defacto complainant
Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 528 of
BNSS to call for the records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime
No.407 of 2024, dated 28.08.2024 on the file of the 1st respondent police
and quash the same.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.24792 of 2024
For Petitioners :Mr.C.Nihil Nandha
For R1 :Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan
Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side)
For R2 :Mr.Abdul Kareem
--------
ORDER
This petition is to quash Crime No.407 of 2024 on the ground
of compromise arrived between the complainant and the accused.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for
the first respondent submitted that on completion of investigation, final
report filed through e-filing and states that if at all the petitioners want to
compromise the matter, they can appear before the Judicial Magistrate
and get the matter settled either under Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
or invoke the provision of plea bargaining.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted
that even if the final report filed, in an exceptional case the Court can
invoke its inherent power under Section 528 of BNSS and that has been
reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kailashben Mahendrabhai
Patel and others v. State of Maharashtra and another reported in 2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
INSC 737.
4. This Court after giving anxious consideration to the
submissions and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court finds that
the facts and circumstances of this case does not warrant in exercise of
inherent power to quash the First Information Report after the completion
of investigation and filing of final report. If the petitioners so advice,
they can move the Court challenging the final report or as suggested by
the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) resort to plea
bargain/compounding whichever is applicable.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
04.10.2024
Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no ari
To:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1. The Inspector of Police, Maraimalai Nagar Police Station, Chennai.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
ari
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
and
04.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!