Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Er.R.Pandiyan vs The Chairman
2024 Latest Caselaw 21201 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21201 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2024

Madras High Court

Er.R.Pandiyan vs The Chairman on 7 November, 2024

Author: R.Vijayakumar

Bench: R.Vijayakumar

                                                                       W.P.(MD).No.13453 of 2023


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 07.11.2024

                                                     CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                             W.P(MD)No.13453 of 2023

                     Er.R.Pandiyan, B.E.,
                     Assistant Engineer/Electrical Retd,
                     (Erstwhile Thirumayam Rural Electric
                           Cooperative Society Limited),
                     Now TANGEDCO, 110 KV/11 KV SS,
                     Thaniyamangalam /MEDC,
                     Madurai – 625 109.                                     ... Petitioner
                                                         Vs.

                     1. The Chairman,
                        TANTRANSCO Building
                        Annasalai, Chennai.

                     2. The Chief Engineer (Personnel)
                        The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
                        Now called as Tamil Nadu Generation
                           and Distribution Corporation Limited,
                        Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

                     3. The Divisional Engineer,
                        Now called as Tamil Nadu Generation
                           and Distribution Corporation Limited,
                        Thirumayamn, Pudukottai,
                        Formerly called as Managing Director of
                        Thirumayam Rural Electrical
                           Cooperative Society (P.A 63),
                        Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District.

                     1/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   W.P.(MD).No.13453 of 2023



                     4. The Superintending Engineer,
                        Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
                        No called as Tamil Nadu Generation
                           and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,
                        Pudukkottai.                                                 ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to
                     promote the petitioner to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer as per the
                     senior list by the proceedings of the second respondent Memo No.
                     026390/389/G18/G181/2019-3, dated 13.09.2022 and based upon the
                     seniority of the petitioner and directing the respondents to refix the salary and
                     pay all retirement and pension benefits.


                                              For Petitioner        : Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj

                                              For Respondents       : Mr.B.Ramanathan
                                                                      Standing Counsel

                                                               ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed by a retired Assistant Engineer

of the respondent Electricity Board, seeking a Mandamus to promote the

petitioner to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer as per the seniority list

published by the second respondent on 13.09.2022, and refix the salary and

pay all retirement and pension benefits.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. The petitioner herein was working as an employe of Thirumayam

Rural Electric Co-operative Society. He was placed under suspension by the

said society. Thereafter, the employees of the said Society have been absorbed

by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. The petitioner was also absorbed by the

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, though he was under suspension.

3. A panel was prepared for promoting the Assistant Engineers to the

post of Assistant Executive Engineer for the panel year 2008. Since the

petitioner was under suspension, the name of the petitioner was over looked.

The petitioner was acquitted from the criminal case on 29.01.2016. Even

thereafter, the petitioner's suspension order was not revoked. Therefore, the

petitioner had filed W.P(MD) No.2603 of 2013 to revoke the order of

suspension. This Court, by an order, dated 21.06.2016 had allowed the writ

petition and directed the Electricity Board to revoke the order of suspension.

This order was challenged by the Electricity Board in W.A(MD) No.440 of

2017. The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, by an order dated

10.08.2017, had partly allowed the appeal with a direction to the Electricity

Board to regularize the period of suspension in view of the judgment of

acquittal. The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court further observed that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

petitioner would not be entitled to any other benefits for the period from the

date of suspension till 29.01.2016. Pursuant to the orders of this Court, the

petitioner was reinstated in service on 20.04.2017. The petitioner has attained

superannuation on 30.07.2022.

4. The petitioner has given a representation on 24.01.2020, to promote

the petitioner to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer as per the interse

seniority. Since the said representation was not considered, the petitioner has

filed W.P(MD) No.10936 of 2022. This Court, by an order dated 08.06.2022

had issued a direction to the Chief Engineer (Personnel) to consider the

petitioner's representation dated 24.01.2020 and pass orders on its merits and

in accordance with law.

5. Pursuant to the orders of this Court, an order was passed on

13.09.2022, wherein the seniority of the writ petitioner was fixed at Serial

No.441 (A). According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, a

candidate by name of Mr.A.Nagarathinam, who is arrayed in Serial No.442,

was promoted in the year 2008. Therefore, when he is inserted as serial No.

441 (A) he should also have been promoted with effect from the year 2008 on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

par with his juniors. Seeking the said prayer, the instant writ petition has been

filed.

6. According to the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner,

the petitioner was suspended due to his implication in DVAC proceedings.

Later, he was acquitted and the Electricity Board has not initiated any

departmental action and they have permitted him to retire from service. In

such circumstances, the petitioner should have been restored with the

seniority and promoted on par with his juniors.

7. Per contra, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

Electricity Board had contended that when the juniors of the writ petitioner

were promoted in the year 2008, the petitioner was under suspension for his

implication in a criminal case. He was acquitted only on 29.01.2016. He also

relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.

(MD) No.440 of 2017, wherein it is observed that the petitioner is not entitled

to any benefits from the date of suspension till the date of acquittal i.e., on

29.01.2016. Therefore, the petitioner cannot seek promotion from the year

2008 onwards, while he was in suspension.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

8. I have carefully considered the submissions made by the learned

counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

9. The petitioner had challenged the order of suspension in W.P(MD)

No.2603 of 2013, and the same was allowed on 21.06.2016. When the

Electricity Board had filed an appeal in W.A(MD) No.440 of 2017, the same

was partly allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court dated

10.08.2017. Paragraph Nos.4 and 5 of the order of the Hon'ble Division

Bench of this Court are extracted as follows:

“4. The writ petitioner was admittedly an employee of Thirumaiyam Rural Co-operative Society. He was only under suspension. The employer employee relationship does not get snapped during suspension. Therefore, when the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board took over the said society, obviously the appellant was taken as an employee of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. It is a matter of record that the appellant had been paying 100% pay during the period of suspension as subsistence allowance. Since the writ petitioner was also acquitted on 29.01.2016, he is entitled to get all the benefits from the said date.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. The appellants are directed to regularize the period of suspension in view of the Judgment of acquittal. However, it is made clear that the appellant will not be entitled to any other benefits for the period from the date of suspension when he was under suspension from service till 29.01.2016.

this writ appeal is partly allowed. No costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.”

10. A careful perusal of the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of

this Court makes it clear that the petitioner will not be entitled to any other

benefits from the date of suspension till 29.01.2016. Therefore, it is clear that

the petitioner cannot claim any monetary benefits or any other benefits during

the said period. Therefore, the request of the petitioner for granting promotion

on par with his juniors from the year 2008, is not legally sustainable in view

of the above said observations of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court.

However, since the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court has made an

observation that the petitioner would be entitled to benefits after 29.01.2016,

the Electricity Board should have considered the request of the petitioner for

his promotion to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer after 29.01.2016,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

especially in the light of the fact that they have not chosen to initiate any

departmental action as against the writ petitioner.

11. The writ petitioner herein has filed a review application seeking to

review the order passed in W.A.(MD) No.440 of 2017, with regard to the

portion of the order wherein his benefits were rejected. The Hon'ble Division

Bench was pleased to partly allow the review application to the extent of

disbursing the monetary benefits alone. Therefore, the question of seeking

promotion orders now with effect from the year 2008 onwards is not legally

sustainable.

12. In view of the above said facts, the respondents herein are directed

to consider the request of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant

Executive Engineer with effect from 01.02.2016 and pass consequential

orders, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

13. With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands partly

allowed to the extent as stated above. There shall be no order as to costs.





                                                                                             07.11.2024
                     NCC      : Yes/No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     ebsi


                     To
                     1. The Chairman,
                        TANTRANSCO Building
                        Annasalai, Chennai.

                     2. The Chief Engineer (Personnel)
                        The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
                        Now called as Tamil Nadu Generation
                           and Distribution Corporation Limited,
                        Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

                     3. The Divisional Engineer,
                        Now called as Tamil Nadu Generation
                           and Distribution Corporation Limited,
                        Thirumayamn, Pudukottai,
                        Formerly called as Managing Director of
                        Thirumayam Rural Electrical
                           Cooperative Society (P.A 63),
                        Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                     4. The Superintending Engineer,
                        Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
                        No called as Tamil Nadu Generation
                           and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,
                        Pudukkottai.





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis





                                      R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

                                                          ebsi









                                                  07.11.2024





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter