Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Inspector General Of Registration ... vs K.Lakshmi (Died)
2024 Latest Caselaw 4749 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4749 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024

Madras High Court

The Inspector General Of Registration ... vs K.Lakshmi (Died) on 1 March, 2024

Author: Sanjay V.Gangapurwala

Bench: Sanjay V.Gangapurwala

                                                                             W.A.(MD) No.284 of 2024



                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 01.03.2024

                                                        CORAM

                      THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                              AND
                       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

                                             W.A.(MD) No.284 of 2024
                                                       and
                                            C.M.P.(MD) No.2806 of 2024

                     1.The Inspector General of Registration of Tamilnadu,
                       O/o. The Inspector General of Registration,
                       Santhom High Road, Chennai.

                     2.The District Registrar,
                       Periyakulam Registration District,
                       Periyakulam.

                     3.The Deputy Collector (Stamps),
                       Madurai District,
                       O/o. Madurai District Collectorate,
                       Madurai.

                     4.The Sub Registrar,
                       Usilampatti Sub Registration,
                       Usilampatti, Madurai District.                ... Appellants/
                                                                         Respondents 1 to 4

                                                             Vs.

                     K.Lakshmi (Died)
                     _________
                     Page 1 of 6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  W.A.(MD) No.284 of 2024




                     1.Vairavan                                           ... 1st Respondent/
                                                                              Writ Petitioner

                     2.J.Nishalini                                        ... 2nd Respondent/
                                                                              5th Respondent


                     Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause XV of the Letters Patent to set aside the

                     order dated 24.04.2023 passed in W.P.(MD) No.4590 of 2020 of this Court.


                                   For Appellants     :         Mr.Veerakathiravan
                                                                Additional Advocate General
                                                                assisted by
                                                                Mr.S.Shanmugavel
                                                                Additional Government Pleader

                                   For Respondent-1 :           Mr.P.Ganapathisubramanian


                                                          JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE]

The present Respondent No.1/original writ petitioner had filed the

writ petition against the order passed by the Sub Registrar refusing to register

a document and demanding an amount of Rs.11,36,442/- from the petitioner

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

on account of the deficit of the stamp duty and registration fees on the

Document No.198 of 2002. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ

petition. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ appeal.

2. We have heard the learned Additional Advocate General for the

appellants.

3. The learned Additional Advocate General submits that there was

deficit stamp duty on a partition deed registered in the year 2002. The mother

of the writ petitioner purchased a part of the property of the said partition

deed in the year 2010 from one of the beneficiaries of the partition deed. In

the year 2020, the settlement deed is executed in favour of the writ petitioner

by the mother. The learned Additional Advocate General submits that the

appellants are entitled to recover the amount.

4. Heard the Advocate for the original writ petitioner.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. The factual matrix does not appear to be a matter of debate. The

mother of the writ petitioner nor the writ petitioner is any way concerned

with the partition deed executed in the year 2002. The mother of the writ

petitioner purchased a part of the property i.e. subject matter of the partition

deed of the year 2002 from one of the beneficiaries of the partition deed in

the year 2010. At the time of registration of the sale deed in favour of the

mother of the writ petitioner, no objection was raised by the appellants at any

point of time. The said document was registered. No encumbrance was

noted on the said document. Now, in the year 2020, the mother of the writ

petitioner executed the gift settlement deed in favour of the writ petitioner.

At that time, the objection is raised that the partition deed of the year 2002

was registered with insufficient stamp duty.

6. Assuming the best case for the appellants, the appellants can, at

the most, recover the amount from the person, who had registered the 2002

document and that too if the appellants have the authority to recover it and

not from the writ petitioner herein.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7. In the light of the above, no case for interference is made out and

the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                       (S.V.G., CJ.)                    (M.S.K., J.)

                                                                         01.03.2024

                     NCC : Yes/No
                     Index : Yes/No
                     Internet : Yes

                     ABR




                     _________




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                                     THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                           and
                                   MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

                                                                  ABR









                                                           01.03.2024




                     _________




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter