Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15924 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2024
SA. No.549 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
SA. No. 549 of 2024
& CMP 17659 of 2024
Vijayakumar
... Appellant
Vs.
Bhaskar
...Respondent
PRAYER : This Second appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure
Code, to set aside the decree and judgment dated 28.03.2024 in AS No. 27
of 2019 on the file of the Additional Sub Ordinate Judge, Ponneri
confirming the decree and judgment dated 08.04.2019 in O.S No. 216 of
2010 on the file of District Munsif Court, Ponneri.
For Appellants : Mr.R.Rajarajan
1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SA. No.549 of 2024
JUDGMENT
This appeal has been filed to set aside the decree and judgment dated
28.03.2024 in AS No. 27 of 2019 on the file of the Additional Sub Ordinate
Judge, Ponneri confirming the decree and judgment dated 08.04.2019 in O.S
No. 216 of 2010 on the file of District Munsif Court, Ponneri.
2. Challenging the concurrent findings the plaintiff preferred this
appeal. Originally the plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction
against the defendant not to interfere with the plaintiff's peaceful possession
of the suit property.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that appellant is in
possession of the property for more than three decades and also pointed out
that in the year 1994 the defendants' mother issued legal notice reclaiming
the possession of the property in which the defendant admitted his
possession prayed for recovery of possession. Further, the learned counsel
for the appellant submits that in the year 2010 suit in O.S No. 216 of 2010
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
was filed for permanent injunction before the Additional subordinate court,
Ponneri, but not for the relief declaration of title though he claimed all these
years both the Court below clearly observed that in spite of cloud over the
title the appellant failed to claim relief of declaration. Now, the learned
counsel for the appellant submits that still the appellant is in possession of
the property owing to the dismissal of the suit his possession will be
disturbed and in order to prove his continuous possession the appellant
produced xerox copies of Family Card. Now, the appellant is inclined to
proceed with the suit for declaration. This Court is inclined to grant 3
months time to file the suit for declaration until then decree passed by the
Trial Court is not to be operated. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of.
The Trial can decide the matter without influence of this order.
4. In the result, this Second appeal is disposed of. No Costs.
Consequentially, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
16.08.2024
pbl
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.
Pbl
To
1.The Section Officer, V.R Section.
16.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!