Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Procter & Gamble Hygiene And Healthcare ... vs Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 15650 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15650 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2024

Madras High Court

Procter & Gamble Hygiene And Healthcare ... vs Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private ... on 12 August, 2024

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                      C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.35 of 20224

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 12.08.2024

                                                    CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                          C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.35 of 2022

                     Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Healthcare Limited,
                     Having its registered office at P&G Plaza,
                     Cardinal Gracias Road,
                     Chakala, Andheri (E),
                     Mumbai-400 099.                                ... Plaintiff
                                                       -vs-

                     Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited,
                     Having its office at the Executive Center, Level 3B,
                     DLF Centre, Sansad Marg, Caonnaught Place,
                     New Delhi -110 001.

                     Also, at:
                     DLF Cyber Park, 6th and 7th Floor, Tower-C,
                     405B, Udyog Vihar, Phase-III, Sector-20,
                     Gurugram, Haryana-122 016.                        ... Defendant


                     PRAYER: Civil Suit (Commercial Division) filed under Order IV
                     Rule 1 of the O.S.Rules 1956, read with Order VII Rule 1 of the CPC
                     1908, read with Section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial
                     Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act (Act
                     No.4 of 2016), prays for a judgment and decree as against the
                     Defendants herein:

                     1/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.35 of 20224

                                  (A) Perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant, its men,
                     servants, agents, assigns, directors, officers, or any person claiming
                     through                      or           under              it                from
                     issuing/circulating/publishing/telecasting/streaming the offending
                     advertisement filed as Plaint Document No.2, or other similar
                     advertisement, in any media and in any language, and thereby,
                     disparaging/denigraiting the Plaintiff's product Vicks Cough Drops
                     by making false, injurious and misleading representations, either
                     directly or indirectly, or in any other manner whatsoever;
                                  (B) Perpetual Injunction restraining the Defendant, its men,
                     servants, agents, assigns, directors, officers, or any person claiming
                     through or under it from making any false, misleading and
                     disparaging representations or from making any slanderous
                     statements/representations/comparisons/telecasts in respect of the
                     plaintiff's product Vicks Cough Drops;
                                  (C) The Defendant be ordered and decreed to pay to the
                     Plaintiff a sum of Rs.1,50,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Fifty Lakh
                     only) as special damages for acts of disparagement committed by the
                     Defendant; and
                                  (D) Order Costs.

                                  For Plaintiff        : Ms.T.Madhumitha
                                                         for M/s.King and Partridge

                                  For Defendant        : M/s.E.Veda Bagath Singh
                                                           **********

                     2/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.35 of 20224



                                                         JUDGMENT

The plaintiff and the defendant have executed a memorandum

of settlement dated 29.07.2024. In terms thereof, the plaintiff has

agreed to withdraw the suit for reasons recorded in clause (1)

thereof.

2.By taking note of the memorandum of settlement, C.S.(Comm

Div) No.35 of 2022 is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as

to costs. Since such withdrawal is pursuant to the settlement, court

fee shall be refunded to the plaintiff.




                                                                                       12.08.2024
                     Index                  : Yes / No

                     Internet               : Yes / No

                     Neutral Citation : Yes / No
                     kal







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.35 of 20224

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

kal

C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.35 of 2022

12.08.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter