Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15447 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024
S.A. No.525 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
S.A. No.525 of 2024
and
C.M.P.No. 16897 of 2024
G.Manikandan ... Appellant
Vs.
1. P.Periyasamy
2. P.Chinnadurai
3. The District Collector,
Cuddalore.
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Virudhachalam,
Cuddalore Dt.
5. The Tahsildar,
Tittagudi Taluk,
Cuddalore Dt. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil
Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2021 in
A.S.No. 23 of 2018 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Tittagudi, Cuddalore
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A. No.525 of 2024
District confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.06.2012 made in
O.S.No.102 of 2012 on the file of Addl. District Munsif Court, Tittagudi.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Veermani
For Respondents : Dr.S.Surya,
Addl. Govt. Pleader for R3 to R5
JUDGMENT
The appellant herein is the 4th defendant in the suit preferred this
Second Appeal challenging the findings of the courts below in the Appeal
Suit in A.S.No. 23 of 2018 on the file of Sub-Judge, Tittagudi, Cuddalore
District confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.102 of 2012
on the file of the Addl. District Munsif Court, Tittagudi, Cuddalore Dt.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred as per the
ranking in the suit.
3. On perusal of records, it reveals that already the property said to be
purchased by the appellant/4th defendant was sold through court auction in
the year 1972, in which, the plaintiffs/respondents 1 and 2 filed a suit
against their vendor. However, the 4th defendant purchased the property
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
subsequently and he claimed right over the property through the settlement
deed, which was said to be executed by his grandmother Thangammal on
22.01.2003. But the fact reveals that the property was already auctioned in
the year of 1972. So, on considering the said fact, this Court also finds that
the 4th defendant has no right over the property. Hence, I do not find any
merit in this Second Appeal and also finds that there is no question of law
arise for consideration. Accordingly, this Second Appeal stands dismissed.
No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
08.08.2024
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
rpp
To
The Sub-Judge, Thittakudi.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
08.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!