Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14915 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024
A.S. No. 974 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
A.S. No. 974 of 2020
and
C.M.P. No. 13709 of 2020
1. K.S.Sriram
2. K.P.Babu
3. N.Kumaravel
4. K.R.Subramaniam
5. P.Palaniyammal ... Appellants/Defendants 8 to 12
-vs-
1. Sree Venkateshraj R.K.
2. Rajammal ... Respondents/Plaintiffs
3. K.R.Chokkalingam
4. The Branch Manager
Canara Bank
Vaiguntham Branch
Sankari Taluk, Salem District.
5. Chinnannan
6. Raju
7. Muthayee @ Ponniyammal (died)
[R1 to R3 and R8 who were already on
record, are recorded as legal
representatives of deceased R7, vide
order of Court dated 01.04.2024 made in
A.S. No. 974 of 2024 and C.M.P. No.
13709 of 2020. Memo is filed on
04.03.2024 is recorded]
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S. No. 974 of 2020
8. Velayee ...Respondents/Defendants 2 to 7
PRAYER: This Appeal is filed under Order 41 Rule 1 and Section 96 of
Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree passed in
O.S.No.221 of 2013 on the file of the III Additional District Judge,
Salem dated 07.09.2019.
For Appellant : Mr. R.Marudhachalamurthy
For Respondents : Mr. D.Rajkumar (R1 & R2)
Mr. M.Mohan (R3)
Mrs. T.Hemalatha (R4)
R5 – R8 (No appearance)
ORDER
The case was taken up and the second respondent,
viz., Rajammal, appeared through video-conferencing along with an
Aadhar Card and the learned counsel, Mr. D.Rajkumar, identified the
person, who appeared through video-conference as the second
respondent.
2. As per the Memo of Compromise filed, 'A' schedule goes to
and in favour of Defendants 8 to 10, 'B' schedule goes to and in favour of
Defendants 8 to 12, 'C' schedule is the property wherein 'A' and 'B'
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
schedules are excluded goes to the plaintiff. The schedules are given in
the memo of compromise, which is taken on file, and the same is attested
by the learned counsel for the appellants and also by the learned counsel
for the respondents 1 and 2.
3. The decree granted in O.S. No. 221 of 2013 on the file of the
III Additional District Judge, Salem is hereby modified in accordance
with the terms of compromise to the limited extent. The appeal suit is
partly allowed to the limited extent as indicated above and the memo of
compromise dated 01.08.2024 shall form part of the decree. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
01.08.2024 Index :Yes/No Maya
To
The III Additional District Judge Salem.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
Maya
A.S. No. 974 of 2020 and
01.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!