Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Anandha Kumari vs The Secretary To The Government
2024 Latest Caselaw 14846 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14846 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024

Madras High Court

R.Anandha Kumari vs The Secretary To The Government on 1 August, 2024

Author: M.S.Ramesh

Bench: M.S. Ramesh

                                                                                     HCP.No.959 of 2024

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 01.08.2024

                                                       CORAM :

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                                   AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

                                               H.C.P.No.959 of 2024


                    R.Anandha Kumari                           ... Petitioner/father of the detenu

                                                         Vs.


                    1.The Secretary to the Government,
                    Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
                    Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

                    2.The District Collector and District Magistrate of
                    Villupuram District, Villupuram.

                    3.The Superintendent of Police,
                    Villupuram District, Villupuram.

                    4.The Superintendent of Prison,
                    Central Prison, Cuddalore.

                    5.The Inspector of Police,
                    Marakkanam Police Station,
                    Villupuram District.                                          ... Respondents




                    Page 1 of 8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                    HCP.No.959 of 2024

                    PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                    issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with
                    the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 17.04.2024
                    in Rc.No.C2/14/2024 against the petitioner's father Ravichandiran, aged 58
                    years, S/o.Natrajan, confined at Central Prison, Cuddalore and set aside the
                    same and direct the respondents to produce the detenue before this Court
                    and set him at liberty.


                                    For Petitioner            : Mr.D.Balaji


                                    For Respondents           : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
                                                                Additional Public Prosecutor


                                                         ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J.

AND SUNDER MOHAN, J.

The petitioner herein is the father of the detenu viz., Ravichandiran,

aged 58 years, S/o.Natrajan, confined at Central Prison, Cuddalore, has

come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by

the second respondent dated 17.04.2024 slapped on his son, branding him

as "Drug Offender" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest

Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual

Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14

of 1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned

counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 13.03.2024 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 17.04.2024. This fact

is not disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura',

reported in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay

from the date of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

between the date of detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble

Supreme Court had held that the live and proximate link, between the

grounds and the purpose of detention, stands snapped in arresting the

detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is extracted

hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if there is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the detention order and consequently render the detention order bad and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar

Banik's case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi

Vs. Principal Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023

SCC OnLine Mad 6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay

from the date of arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live

and proximate link between them would also stand snapped and thereby,

had quashed the detention order on this ground.

7. In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu',

reported in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the delay

of 36 days in passing the detention order after the arrest of the detenu

would snap the live and proximate link between the grounds and purpose

of detention. Hence, in view of the unexplained and inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention, after the arrest of the detenu, the detention

order in the present case, is liable to be quashed.

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent

on 17.04.2024 in Rc.No.C2/14/2024, is hereby set aside and the Habeas

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu viz., Ravichandiran, aged 58 years,

S/o.Natrajan, confined at Central Prison, Cuddalore, is directed to be set at

liberty forthwith, unless his confinement is required in connection with any

other case.

                                                                 [M.S.R., J]           [S.M., J]
                                                                            01.08.2024
                    Index: Yes/No
                    Neutral Citation: Yes/No
                    Anu

Note :- Registry shall forthwith return the booklet containing the materials, on which, the Detaining Authority has placed reliance, to the petitioner/counsel for the petitioner with due acknowledgment.

To

1.The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate of Villupuram District, Villupuram.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

4.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Cuddalore.

5.The Inspector of Police,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Marakkanam Police Station, Villupuram District

6.The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai

7.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and SUNDER MOHAN, J.

Anu

01.08.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter