Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Nazeema vs The Divisional Manager
2023 Latest Caselaw 14479 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14479 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2023

Madras High Court

A.Nazeema vs The Divisional Manager on 22 November, 2023

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh

                                                                      W.P.(MD)No.22310 of 2021




                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 22.11.2023

                                                        CORAM

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                          W.P.(MD)No.22310 of 2021
                                                    and
                                         W.M.P.(MD).No.18869 of 2021

                    A.Nazeema                                           ... Petitioner
                                                         Vs.

                    1.The Divisional Manager,
                      Southern Railway,
                      O/o. the Divisional Manager,
                      Southern Railway, Madurai.

                    2.The Divisional Personnel Officer,
                      Southern Railway,
                      O/o. the Divisional Personnel Officer,
                      Southern Railway, Madurai.

                    3.Babu @ Mohideen Batcha                           ... Respondents
                    PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                    India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd
                    respondents to issue the proceedings No. U/P.148/1/WP/SSE/W/MDU
                    dated 10.07.2013 as per the petitioner’s representation dated 15.10.2021.
                                       For Petitioner            : Mr.MA.M.Raja

                                       For R-1 & R-2            : Mr.K.R.Laxman,
                                                                Standing Counsel

                   1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        W.P.(MD)No.22310 of 2021


                                                     ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of writ of

mandamus directing the first and second respondents to deal with the

representation made by the petitioner on 15.10.2021, wherein, the

petitioner has requested the first and second respondents to include her

name in the family composition which was earlier deleted through

proceedings dated 10.07.2013.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side.

3. The case of the petitioner is that she married the third

respondent in the year 2007 as per the Mohammedan law. There was a

matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent. The

third respondent seems to have pronounced Triple Talak and ended the

marriage. This was challenged by the petitioner in O.S.No.147 of 2010

before the Sub Court, Theni and the trial Court decreed the suit in favour

of the petitioner through Judgment and Decree dated 16.12.2014.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4. The third respondent filed an appeal before the learned

Principal District Judge, Theni in A.S.No.5 of 2015 and the matter was

thereafter transferred to the Additional District Court, Periyakulam and the

appeal ended in favour of the third respondent through Judgment and

Decree dated 30.11.2015. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed S.A.

(MD).No.158 of 2016 and this Second Appeal was allowed through

Judgment and Decree dated 18.09.2019 and thereby, the Judgment of the

trial Court was confirmed. This Judgment was further confirmed by the

Hon'ble Apex Court while dismissing the S.L.P filed by the third

respondent by an order dated 11.09.2020.

5. The grievance of the petitioner is that pursuant to the

Judgment passed by the Appellate Court in A.S.No.5 of 2015, the third

respondent had made a representation to the first and second respondents

and deleted the name of the petitioner from the family composition. After

the Apellate Court Judgment was set aside by this Court and was further

confirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the petitioner made a representation

to the first and second respondents to restore her name in the family

composition. Since the same was not acted upon, the present Writ Petition

has been filed before this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

6. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the

first and second respondents submitted that the second respondent will

deal with the representation made by the petitioner after hearing the

petitioner and the third respondent and will take a decision within the time

frame fixed by this Court.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstance of the

case, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to deal with the

representation made by the petitioner on 15.10.2021 after affording an

opportunity to the petitioner and the third respondent and appropriate

orders shall be passed within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order.

8. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

22.11.2023

NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

tsg

22.11.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter