Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Branch Manager vs Kodakkaran
2023 Latest Caselaw 14388 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14388 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2023

Madras High Court

The Branch Manager vs Kodakkaran on 21 November, 2023

Author: N.Seshasayee

Bench: N.Seshasayee

                                                                              C.M.A No.1295 of 2022

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 21.11.2023

                                                      CORAM

                                        MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

                                             C.M.A.No.1295 of 2022
                                      and C.M.P.Nos.9408 and 20637 of 2022

                     The Branch Manager,
                     M/s.National Insurance
                     Company Limited,
                     Door No.88-F, Bye-Pass Road,
                     Dharmapuri Town
                     Dharmapuri Taluk and District.                           ... Appellant

                                                         Vs.
                     1.Kodakkaran
                     2.Veerammal
                     3.Veerappan
                     4.Dhanalakshmi
                     5.Sathiya
                     6.K.Nagaraj                                               ... Respondents

                     Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                     Vehicles Acct, 1988, seeking to set aside the decree and judgment dated
                     07.01.2022 passed in MCOP.No.538 of 2019, by the Motor Accidents
                     Claims Tribunal, (Special District Court), Dharmapuri.


                                  For Appellant        : Mr.J.Michael Visuvasam

                                  For Respondents       : Mr.D.Rameshkumar for R1 to R5
                                                          No Appearance - R6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/6
                                                                              C.M.A No.1295 of 2022



                                                  JUDGMENT

On 11.02.2019 at around 04.00 p.m, a pillion rider of a motorcycle

bearing Registration No.TN 29 BJ 4534 died allegedly when a stray dog

jumped on the line of motion of the vehicle. The vehicle belonged to and

was driven at the relevant time by the first respondent in the claim

petition, now the sixth respondent in this appeal. When the rider of the

motorcycle suddenly applied the breaks, the pillion rider fell onto the road

and died.

2.Seeking compensation, the other heirs of the victim preferred

M.C.O.P.No.538 of 2019 before the MACT (Special District Court),

Dharmapuri for compensation. The Tribunal has determined the

compensation at Rs.8,09,150/- and fastened the liability on the owner and

the insurer jointly and severally.

3.Contending that the insurance company is not liable to meet the liability

created under the award, it has now preferred the present appeal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.Mr.Michael Visuvasam, the learned counsel for the appellant argued as

below:

(a) Soon after the accident, the rider of the motorcycle, who is

the son of the victim himself took his mother to the hospital.

In the accident register, the doctors have recorded a statement

that the victim had fallen on her own and there is no mention

about any stray dogs forcing an accident;

(b) the accident was described by the owner cum rider of the

two wheeler involved, and it is his self-serving version that

alone is not on record and corroborated by any independent

witness. Inasmuch as the claim petition is made under

Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter

referred to as 'the Act'), negligence have to be proven by the

claimants, and this cannot be decided on the self-serving

version of P.W.2.

5.Mr.D.Rameshkumar, the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 5,

submitted that even if negligence is not proved, the Court can still try this

application under Section 163 A of the Act. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

6.Inasmuch as 163 A of the Act is now replaced by Section 164 of the

Act, the claimants would be entitled to Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs

only) for this fatal accident. This amount has to be allowed.

7.Accordingly, this appeal is partly allowed and the compensation

amount is fixed at Rs.5,00,000/-. The appellant herein is stated to have

deposited 50% of the award sum, and it is now directed to pay the

differential sum, if any required to be paid, with interest at 7.5% interest

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

Judgment. As and when the amount is deposited, the amount standing to

the credit of the case can be withdrawn by the claimants. No Costs.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

8.Since the rider of the motorcycle, the sixth respondent herein did not

shown to be possessing a valid driving license, the appellant is entitled to

pay and recover the same.

21.11.2023

Anu Index: Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes / No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Special District Court), Dharmapuri.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.SESHASAYEE, J.

Anu

and C.M.P.Nos.9408 and 20637 of 2022

21.11.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter