Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kasthuri Thilagam vs District Registrar
2023 Latest Caselaw 5072 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5072 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 May, 2023

Madras High Court
Kasthuri Thilagam vs District Registrar on 18 May, 2023
                                                                         W.P.Nos.15629 and 15632 of 2023


                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       DATED : 18.05.2023

                                                            CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

                                            W.P.Nos.15629 and 15632 of 2023

                     1.Kasthuri Thilagam
                     2.Kothainayagi                                             ..Petitioners in
                                                                                  W.P.No.15629 of
                                                                                  2023

                     1.Vijayalakshmi
                     2.Vijaynarayanan Yadav                                     ..Petitioners in
                                                                                  W.P.No.15632 of
                                                                                  2023


                                                                 Vs


                     1.District Registrar,
                       Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

                     2.The Sub Registrar,
                       Panruti Registration Sub Division,
                       Panruti.                                                 ..Respondents in
                                                                                  both W.Ps


                                  Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for
                     the          records   of   the    second    respondent      made     in   refusal
                     Nos.RFL/Panruti/25/2023                and       RFL/Panruti/25/2023        dated
                     21.04.2023 and to quash the same and consequently direct the
                     second respondent to register the documents/release deeds for
                     registration.



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     Page 1 of 5
                                                                      W.P.Nos.15629 and 15632 of 2023




                                        For Petitioners    :    Mr.P.Paramasivadoss
                                                                in both W.Ps

                                        For Respondents :       Mr.Karthick Jaganathan,
                                                                Government Advocate
                                                                in both W.Ps

                                                       COMMON ORDER

                                  Two separate writ petitions have been filed, one by the two

                     sisters of the settlee and the other by the sister-in-law and her son

                     again in favour of the same settlee wherein the petitioners had

                     presented the release deeds for registration which had been

                     refused to be registered by the second respondent/Sub Registrar

                     of Panruti Registration Sub District, Panruti, on the ground that a

                     suit in O.S.No.145 of 2014 had been decreed by judgment dated

                     28.04.2018 by the Principal Sub Court at Cuddalore wherein a

                     preliminary decree was passed granting 8/28 share to yet another

                     sister, who is a not a party to the present proceedings. When the

                     registration deeds have been presented by the petitioners herein,

                     refusal           check   slips    have   been   issued    by    the    second

                     respondent/Sub Registrar necessitating filing of the present writ

                     petitions.



                                  2.     It is submitted that consequent to such partition, the


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     Page 2 of 5
                                                                       W.P.Nos.15629 and 15632 of 2023


                     remainder portion of the lands are now being released by the

                     petitioners herein in favour of their own brother/settlee. It is trite

                     in law to point out that the Sub Registrar cannot insist on a

                     particular manner in which a property has to be dealt with within a

                     family. The property can be subdivided on the basis of partition,

                     the property can be further divided on the basis of relinquishment

                     made by an individual member of the family in favour of another

                     member of the family, the property could also be divided by way of

                     executing a settlement deed. When such a property is divided,

                     there will always be a fragment of a property which is left over.

                     That can also be dealt with independently. There cannot be one

                     particular document in which the comprehensive division of the

                     property could be presented before the Sub Registrar.



                                  3.        In the instant cases, a suit had been filed in which

                     8/28 share had been determined to fall to the share of one of the

                     sisters. The other sisters and the widow of the brother of settlee

                     and her son have now decided to relinquish their shares in favour

                     of the settlee. This is purely a transaction within the family and

                     cannot be objected to by the Sub Registrar. He cannot dictate the

                     terms             on   which   relinquishment   deed   should   be   executed.

                     Therefore, the refusal check slips are interfered with by this Court


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     Page 3 of 5
                                                                     W.P.Nos.15629 and 15632 of 2023


                     and a direction is given to the second respondent to register the

                     documents if adequate stamp duty and registration charges have

                     been tendered at the time of registration.



                                  4. The writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. No costs.




                                                                                       18.05.2023

                     Index: Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation: Yes/No
                     mmi/kmk



                     To

                     1.The District Registrar,
                       Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

                     2.The Sub Registrar,
                       Panruti Registration Sub Division,
                       Panruti.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     Page 4 of 5
                                         W.P.Nos.15629 and 15632 of 2023




                                             C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

mmi/kmk

W.P.Nos.15629 and 15632 of 2023

18.05.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter