Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3635 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2023
C.M.P. (MD)No.3341 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 31.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.M.P.(MD)No.3341 of 2023
and
C.M.A.(MD) No.SR13955 of 2023
The Managing Director,
Ms.,TNSTC Limited,
Kumbakonam,
Thanjavur District. ...Petitioner/Appellant
Vs.
Nathiya ...Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER in C.M.P.(MD)No.3341 of 2023: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is
filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act to condone the delay of 97
days in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree
dated 07.07.2022 passed in M.C.O.P.No.121 of 2022 on the file of the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal Special Sub Court, Thanjavur.
PRAYER in C.M.A.(MD)No.SR13955 of 2023: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to set aside the
judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.121 of 2022 dated 07.07.2022 on the file of
the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Thanjavur.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.V.B.Krishnakanth
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P. (MD)No.3341 of 2023
ORDER
This application has been filed to condone the delay of 97 days in
preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree, dated
07.07.2022 passed in M.C.O.P.No.121 of 2022 on the file of the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Thanjavur.
2.The reason stated in the application is that the Corporation sought an legal
opinion as to whether an appeal can be filed against the judgment and decree made
by the Tribunal.
3.On perusal of the entire affidavit, except the said reason, no other
sufficient reasons whatsoever have been given by the petitioner. This Court is of
the view that such casual explanations cannot be accepted in the Court of law.
Though Section 5 of the Limitation Act reads liberal approach in condoning the
delay with sufficient cause, such liberal approach cannot be adopted in a
mechanical manner without even any valuable reasons.
4.Further, the very appeal itself is filed challenging the award of the
Tribunal granting compensation of Rs.25,000/- for the injuries sustained by the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P. (MD)No.3341 of 2023
claimant. The accident is not disputed. The only ground, on which the defence
was put forth is that only the driver of the tractor was negligent and not the driver
of the corporation. Whereas the evidence adduced before the Tribunal clearly
proves that the negligence is on the part of the driver of the bus. Such view of the
matter, the very filing of the appeal for such small amount of compensation, is
nothing but an abuse of process of law.
4. For the reasons stated above, this Court does not find any merit in this
petition and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is also rejected at the SR stage
itself. No costs.
31.03.2023 Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No ta
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P. (MD)No.3341 of 2023
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
ta
To
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Thanjavur.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.M.P.(MD)No.3341 of 2023 and C.M.A.(MD) No.SR13955 of 2023
31.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!