Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pothiappan vs Kamurudeen
2023 Latest Caselaw 2064 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2064 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2023

Madras High Court
Pothiappan vs Kamurudeen on 8 March, 2023
                                                                               C.R.P(MD).No.622 of 2023


                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 08.03.2023

                                                       CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
                                             C.R.P(MD).No.622 of 2023
                                                      and
                                             CMP(MD)No.2888 of 2023

                  Pothiappan                           ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant
                                                        Vs.

                  Kamurudeen                           ... Respondent/Respondent/Respondent

                  PRAYER:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of
                  the Constitution of India, to set aside fair and decreetal order dated
                  27.01.2023 made in I.A.No.34 of 2022 in A.S.S.R.No.585 of 2022 on the file
                  of the Sub Court, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District, and allow the Civil
                  Revision Petition.
                                      For petitioner   : Mr.S.Prabha

                                                       ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the impugned fair

and decreetal order dated 27.01.2023 in I.A.No.34 of 2021 in ASSR 585 of

2022.

2.The Court below has dismissed the application filed for condoning

the delay of 269 days in filing the appeal against the judgment and decree

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD).No.622 of 2023

dated 27.08.2021 in O.S.No.52 of 2018 by the respondent for recovery of

arrears of rent. The application for condoning the delay was dismissed on the

ground that the petitioner has not explained the delay properly. Operative

portion of lower Court in the impugned order reads as under:-

“10.kDjhuhh; jug;gpy; nky;KiwaPl;oid chpa fhyj;jpw;Fs; jhf;fy; bra;a ,ayhjjw;fhd fhuzkhf Twg;gl;Ls;sJ Vw;Wf;bfhs;sj;jf;fjhf ,y;iy. nkYk;> ,f;fhuzj;jpw;F kDjhuh; jug;gpy; vt;tpj rhl;rpaKk;> rhd;whtzKk; ,y;iy. vjph;kDjhuh; jug;gpy; vjpUiuapy; Fwpg;gplg;gl;Ls;s kWg;g[f; fl;rpahdJ kDjhuh; jug;gpy; thJiuapy; kWf;fg;gltpy;iy. mry; tHf;fhd m.t.vz;. 52/2018-y; tprhuiz ePjpkd;wj;jhy; 27.08.2021 md;W jPh;g;g[iu gfug;gl;os;s epiyapy;< gpd;dpl;L ,e;j vjphpkDjhuuhy; jhf;fy; bra;ag;gl;l epiwntw;W kDtpy; ,e;j kDjhuh; M$uhfpa[k; bjhlh;e;J fl;rp bra;J te;Js;s epiyapy;> nky;KiwaPl;oid jhf;fy; bra;tjw;F Vw;gl;Ls;s 269 ehl;fs; fhyjhkjj;jpy; xt;bthU ehs; fhyjhkj;ija[k; ,e;ePjpkd;wk; jpUg;jpa[Uk; tifapy; vLj;Jf; Tw ntz;oaJ kDjhuhpd; flg;ghhL Mfk;. Mdhy; ,k;kDtpy; kDjhuh; jug;gpy;

                             fhyjhkjj;jpw;fhd                   vt;tpj                tUthd
                             fhuzKk;         ,y;yhky;          ,k;kDtpw;fhf      bgha;ahft[k;>
                             nkk;nghf;fht[k;                Twfg;gl;Ls;s               fhuzk;

vd;gJ ,e;ePjpkd;wj;jpw;F bjhpa tUtjhy; ,k;kDthdJ js;Sgo bra;ag;gl ntz;oaJ ePjpapd; eyDf;F cfe;jJ vd ,e;ePjpkd;wk; jPh;t[ fhz;fpwJ.”

3.The petitioner is not required to explain the delay on each day. It is

sufficient for him to explain the delay sufficiently for the Court to come to

the conclusion that there were sufficient grounds for condoning the delay.

4.It is noticed that the respondent has also filed E.P.No.4 of 2021

pursuant to decree passed in O.S.No.52 of 2018 on 27.08.2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD).No.622 of 2023

5.Considering the fact that the petitioner was lazy litigant and had

taken time in filing the appeal with a delay of 269 days, Court is inclined to

set aside the impugned order passed by the Trial Court in I.A.No.34 of 2022

in A.S.S.R.No.585 of 2022 by directing the petitioner to deposit 50% of the

decree amount with the interest thereon within a period of 4 weeks from

today before the Execution Court.

6.Subject to such compliance, all further proceedings in EP.No.4 of

2022 in O.S.No.52 of 2018 shall be stayed until further order in the Appeal.

All further proceeding shall be subjected to further orders to be passed by the

Sub Court, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District, in the proposed appeal. The Sub

Court, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District, is directed to number the appeal and

list the appeal for admission.

7.The Civil Revision Petition stands allowed with the above direction.

No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

.

08.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No dss

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD).No.622 of 2023

C.SARAVANAN,J.

dss

To

1.The Sub Court, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

C.R.P(MD).No.622 of 2023 and CMP(MD)No.2888 of 2023

08.03.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter