Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Reka vs State Represented By
2023 Latest Caselaw 1958 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1958 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2023

Madras High Court
Reka vs State Represented By on 7 March, 2023
                                                                                 Crl.O.P.No.23606 of 2019

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 07.03.2023

                                                          CORAM:

                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

                                            Crl.O.P.No.23606 of 2019 and
                                             Crl.M.P.No.12443 of 2019

                  1.Reka
                  2.S.Saravanan
                  3.Mathiyazhagan
                  4.Sakthivel
                  5.Joseph Christian
                  6.Venkatachalam
                  7.Nagappan
                  8.Pandyaraj                                                  ... Petitioners

                                                           Vs.
                  1.State Represented by
                    The Sub Inspector of Police,
                    Nallur Police Station,
                    Namakkal District.
                  2. R.Nainar                                                  ... Respondents
                  PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to
                  call for the records and quash the proceedings in S.T.C. No.20 of 2019
                  pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi against the petitioners.
                                        For Petitioners      : Mr.L.Sharath Kumar

                                        For Respondents      : Mr.A.Damodaran,
                                                               Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1

                                                                 No appearance for R2


                 1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  Crl.O.P.No.23606 of 2019

                                                        ORDER

The petitioners seek to quash the final report filed under Sections

143, 285 and 188 of IPC against them.

2. The allegations against the petitioners is that on 06.04.2016 at

about 8.25 p.m., near Kandhampalayam bus stop, they assembled and raised

slogans against the former Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi and another

leader Mr.V. Gopalsamy and caused nuisance to the people. It is also alleged

that they have burnt the effigy of Mr.V. Gopalsamy. On reading of the charge

sheet, this Court finds that the respondent police have no jurisdiction to

investigate and file final report for the offence under Section 188 IPC.

Section 195(1)(a)(i) of Cr.P.C. reads as under:

“ Section 195(1) in The Code Of Criminal Procedure,

(1) No Court shall take cognizance-

(a) (i) of any offence punishable under sections 172 to 188 (both inclusive) of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860 ), or

(ii) of any abetment of, or attempt to commit, such offence, or

(iii) of any criminal conspiracy to commit such offence, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate;”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.23606 of 2019

This issue is covered by the judgment of of this Court in Jeevanandham and

another v. State, Karur District (2018 2 LW crl 606), wherein this Court

quashed the final report for the offence under Section 188 Cr.P.C. and the

other allied offences on the ground that the police have no jurisdiction to

register the FIR and file a final report, for the offence under Section 188 IPC.

3. As regards the other offence under Section 143, this Court

finds that mere assembly of persons to protest cannot be called an unlawful

assembly. The assembly of persons in this case, admittedly, was only to

express dissatisfaction with the government. There is nothing in the

impugned charge to suggest that the petitioners formed an unlawful assembly

and hence, Section 143 of IPC is also not made out. In fact, this is also

covered by the very same judgment in Jeevanandham case, wherein this

Court had quashed prosecution launched against similarly placed persons who

expressed dissatisfaction with the government.

4. As regards the offence under Section 285 of IPC, this Courts

finds that there is nothing in the impugned charge sheet to suggest that the

petitioners had acted negligently or rashly so as to endanger human life. One

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.23606 of 2019

cannot infer that the petitioner acted rashly or negligently merely because they

had burnt an effigy. The essential ingredients of the offence under Section 285

IPC is not found in the charge sheet.

5. For the above reasons, the impugned proceedings in

S.T.C.No.20 of 2019 is quashed. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is

allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.03.2023

Index: Yes/No

Speaking / Non Speaking Order

kal

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.23606 of 2019

To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Nallur Police Station, Namakkal District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.23606 of 2019

SUNDER MOHAN, J

kal

Crl.O.P.No.23606 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.12443 of 2019

07.03.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter