Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7068 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 June, 2023
C.M.A.No.2533 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.M.A.No.2533 of 2019
and C.M.P.No.12042 of 2019
United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
Divisional Office,
Salem. ... Appellants
Vs.
1.Kuppan
2.Sivabakkiyam ... Respondents
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against
Judgment and Decree dated 10.04.2018 passed in M.C.O.P.No.64 of 2016 on
the file of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (III Additional District Court),
Kallakurichi, Villupuram District.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Chandran
For Respondents
For R1 : Mr.R.Kumaravel
For R2 : Unclaimed
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.2533 of 2019
JUDGMENT
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises against the award passed by the
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (III Additional District Judge), Kallakurichi,
Villupuram District, in M.C.O.P.No.64 of 2016 on 10.04.2018.
2. It is the case of the appellant that on 22.01.2017 at about 4.30 a.m., the
2nd respondent's Luxury Bus bearing Reg.No.PY-01-CB-0919 driven in a rash
and negligent manner and dashed against the 1st respondent's house. When the
bus was taken out by heavy weight lifter from the 1 st respondent's house, the
full house was damaged. The 1st respondent's household things worth Rs.2 lakh
and cash Rs.50,000/- were damaged. The damaged house building worth about
Rs.13 lakhs. The 1st respondent filed petition seeking compensation for the
alleged accident on the ground that the appellant / 1st respondent is the owner of
the vehicle and the 2nd respondent was insurer of the vehicle are vicariously
liable to pay compensation to the petitioner for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- with
interest and costs. Hence, the appellant / insurance company filed the present
appeal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2533 of 2019
3. The learned counsel for the appellant / insurance company submitted
that insurance policies of the respondents have not been marked before the
Tribunal to prove the contention. Therefore, an opportunity may be given to the
insurance company to produce the evidence and agitate the same before the
Court below.
4. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent also has no objection to
remand back this matter to the Court below for fresh consideration.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for
the respondent and perused the materials available on record.
6. It is seen from the records that the appellant has failed to produce
insurance policies of the respondents, which are vital evidence of this case.
Therefore, this Court is inclined to grant an opportunity to the appellant to mark
the evidence / insurance policies of the respondents.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2533 of 2019
7. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that it would be
appropriate to remand the matter back to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
(III Additional District Judge), Kallakurichi, Villupuram, for reconsideration.
8. Accordingly, the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
(III Additional District Judge), Kallakurichi, Villupuram District, in
M.C.O.P.No.64 of 2016 dated 10.04.2018 is set aside and the matter is
remanded back to the Court below for fresh consideration.
9. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
26.06.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order ata
To
The Presiding Officer, The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (III Additional District Judge), Kallakurichi, Villupuram District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2533 of 2019
A.A.NAKKIRAN.J,
ata
C.M.A.No.2533 of 2019
26.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!