Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6875 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2023
C.R.P.No.1886 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
C.R.P.No.1886 of 2023
and
C.M.P.No.12032 of 2023
K.R.Ilavarasi ... Petitioner
Vs.
S.Usha ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil
Procedure Code to allow the C.R.P. and set aside the fair and decreetal
order dated 02.02.2023 passed in E.P.No.2678 of 2019 in O.S.No.590 of
2014 by the X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Venkateswaran
For Caveator : Mr.R.Thiagarajan
ORDER
This revision is filed, challenging the orders passed in E.P.No.2678
of 2019 in O.S.No.590 of 2014 dated 02.02.2023 on the file of the X
Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.1886 of 2023
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner / Judgment
Debtor that the Execution Court without considering the fact that the decree
itself is a nullity, as decree was passed without considering the rights of the
petitioner in the disputed land.
3. During the course of submissions, Mr.R.Thiagarajan, learned
counsel for the Caveator, has submitted that E.P.No.2678 of 2019 in
O.S.No.590 of 2014 has already been allowed and possession was also
taken by the decree holder on 12.06.2023 and accordingly, the bailiff has
also filed a report before the Court.
4. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for
the petitioner that he moved an application in E.A.SR.No.36810 and 36811
of 2023 under Section 47 of C.P.C. and the said application was dismissed
at a threshold on 03.06.2023. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that the petitioner has filed an application for certified copies and
soon after obtaining the copies, the petitioner intends to prefer revision.
________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.1886 of 2023
5. In view of the above, since the possession has already been
delivered under the E.P.No.2678 of 2019 in O.S.No.590 of 2014 and
thereby the decree holder has taken over the possession, this revision has
become infructuous. This revision is, therefore, dismissed giving liberty to
challenge the orders passed in E.P.No.2678 of 2019 in O.S.No.590 of 2014.
The Execution Court is at liberty to terminate the execution petition by
following the due process of law.
6. With the observations, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous
Petition is closed.
22.06.2023
Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Neutral Citation Case: Yes/No ab
To
1.The X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras.
________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.1886 of 2023
Dr.D.NAGARJUN, J.
ab
C.R.P.No.1886 of 2023
22.06.2023
________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!