Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6774 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2023
C.M.A.(MD).No.539 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.M.A.(MD).No.539 of 2023
and
C.M.P.(MD).No.7001 of 2023
The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Karaikudi. ... Appellant
Vs.
1.Minor Jeevitha
through Guardian /Grand father Sethuraman,
2.Kaliammal
... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award made in
M.C.O.P.No.28 of 2017, dated 27.11.2017 on the file of the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Paramakudi.
For Appellant : Mr.D.Sivaraman
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
C.M.A.(MD).No.539 of 2023
JUDGMENT
Not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, the present appeal has been filed by the Transport
Corporation.
2. The brief facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as follows:
On 22.09.2016, at about 3.45 p.m., when the deceased was riding his
motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN 65 Y 1621 from Paramakudi to Ulaiyur,
the bus bearing Registration No.TN 63 N 0882 came in a rash and negligent
manner and dashed against the two wheeler of the deceased. As a result, he
succumbed to injuries and the crime also registered against the driver of the
appellant /Transport Corporation bus. At the time of accident, he was aged
about 38 years.
3. It is the stand of the appellant/Transport Corporation before the
Tribunal that only the rider of the motorcycle drove the vehicle in a rash and
negligent manner and dashed against the Transport Corporation bus.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.(MD).No.539 of 2023
4. Before the Tribunal, on the side of the petitioner, P.Ws.1 and 2 were
examined and Exs.P1 to P20 were marked and on the side of the respondents,
R.W.1 was examined and Ex.R1 was marked.
5. On perusal of the evidence of the eye witnesses, the Tribunal has
found that only the driver of the offending vehicle was negligent in driving the
vehicle and fixed the notional income of the deceased at Rs.6,500/-, taking note
of the fact that the deceased was working as a Carpenter and awarded a sum of
Rs.13,15,480/- as compensation. Challenging the quantum of compensation, the
present appeal has been filed.
6. I have perused the order of the Tribunal.
7. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that the
Tribunal has granted a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards love and affection instead
of Rs.40,000/-. This Court is of the view that though the Tribunal has granted
excess compensation towards love and affection, considering the
circumstances, the notional income fixed by the Tribunal is very low and the
Tribunl ought to have given more.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.(MD).No.539 of 2023
8. Considering the above, this Court do not interfere with the award
passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is
dismissed and the appellant / Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the
award amount within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy
of this judgment. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous
Petition is closed.
21.06.2023 akv
To
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Paramakudi.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.(MD).No.539 of 2023
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
akv
C.M.A.(MD).No.539 of 2023
21.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!