Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.M.Muhaideen vs M.Diwan Pakkir Mohideen
2023 Latest Caselaw 8809 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8809 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2023

Madras High Court
K.M.Muhaideen vs M.Diwan Pakkir Mohideen on 21 July, 2023
                                                                                   CRP(MD).No.2329 of 2012


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                     DATED: 21.07.2023

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                         CRP(NPD)(MD).No.2329 of 2012 and
                                          MP(MD).Nos.1 of 2012 and 2013


                    K.M.Muhaideen
                    (name of the petitioner is substituted
                    vide Court order, dated 14.07.2023 made in
                    CMP(MD).No.8544 of 2023 in
                    CRP(MD).No.2329 of 2012)                                      .. Petitioner


                                                           Vs


                    M.Diwan Pakkir Mohideen                                       .. Respondent


                    PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the

                    Constitution of India to set aside the Judgment and Decree, dated

                    24.07.2012 passed in O.S.No.197 of 2006 on the file of the Wakf Tribunal

                    (Principal Sub court), Thirunelveli.

                                    For Petitioner           : Mr.D. Nallathambi
                                    For Respondent           : Mr. M.P. Senthil




                   1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                CRP(MD).No.2329 of 2012


                                                    ORDER

The present revision has been filed by the defendant in

O.S.No.197 of 2006 on the file of the Wakf Tribunal (Principal Sub Court,

Thirunelveli). The respondent herein as plaintiff had filed a suit in

O.S.No.181 of 2003 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court,

Thirunelveli for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the

defendant and other members of the defendant Pallivasal from interfering

with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the scheduled land and the

school run by the plaintiff's Jamath.

2. The Trial Court after considering the submissions on either

side dismissed the suit on 21.03.2005. The plaintiff had filed A.S.No.141

of 2005 before the II Additional Sub Court, Thirunelveli. The First

Appellate Court had found that the issue relates to the Wakf Property and

therefore, Wakf Tribunal alone has got jurisdiction to entertain such suit.

After arriving at such a finding, the First Appellate Court remanded the

matter to the trial Court for passing appropriate orders. The trial Court after

remand, passed a detailed order returning the plaint under Order 7 Rule 10

CPC. Thereafter, the plaintiff has chosen to file plaint before the Wakf

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD).No.2329 of 2012

Tribunal (Principal Sub Court, Thirunelveli). The suit was re-numbered as

O.S.No.197 of 2006.

3. After remand, the oral and documentary evidence were

recorded afresh before the Wakf Tribunal. Thereafter, the Tribunal arrived

at finding that the land and school belong to the plaintiff's Pallivasal and

decreed the suit as prayed for. Challenging the said order, the present

revision has been filed by the defendant / Pallivasal.

4. According to the learned counsel for the revision

petitioner / defendant in the suit, the Wakf Tribunal granted decree for

permanent injunction as against the members of the respondent Pallivasal

except with regard to the fact that they can worship in the plaintiff's

Dhurga.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner /

defendant in the suit in O.S.No.197 of 2006 has contended that taking

advantage of the decree passed by the Wakf Tribunal, the plaintiff's

Pallivasal is refusing to admit the students belonging to the defendant

Pallivasal. It is the only grievance that is ventilated by the petitioner

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD).No.2329 of 2012

counsel before this Court in the revision.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent / plaintiff,

on instructions, submits that already the children belonging to the members

of the revision petitioner / pallivasal have been admitted and they are

studying in the school. They further undertake that they will not have any

objection for admitting the children of the defendant Pallivasal in the

plaintiff Pallivasal school. The said undertaking is recorded. Since the

only grievance of the defendant is that the children has been satisfied no

further orders are required in the present revision.

7. Recording the said undertaking, this Civil Revision Petition

stands closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous

Petition is closed.

21.07.2023

Index: Yes/No Internet : Yes/No trp

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD).No.2329 of 2012

To

The Wakf Tribunal (Principal Sub court), Thirunelveli.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD).No.2329 of 2012

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

trp

CRP(NPD)(MD).No.2329 of 2012 and MP(MD).Nos.1 of 2012 and 2013

21.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter