Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pazhaniyammal vs Saroja
2023 Latest Caselaw 336 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 336 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2023

Madras High Court
Pazhaniyammal vs Saroja on 5 January, 2023
    2023/MHC/107

                                                                                 C.R.P.No.2818 of 2022

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 05.01.2023

                                                        CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                                  C.R.P.No.2818 of 2022
                                                          and
                                                 C.M.P.No.15231 of 2022


                     1.Pazhaniyammal

                     2.Selvi                                                   ... Petitioners

                                                          Vs.


                     Saroja                                                    ... Respondent


                     Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
                     Constitution of India, to allow this Civil Revision Petition and thereby set
                     aside the ex-parte order of the Court below dated 22.12.2020 passed in
                     E.P.No.98 of 2019 in O.S.No.301 of 2019 by the District Munsif cum
                     Judicial Magistrate, Sendurai.


                                     For Petitioners        : Mr.K.Gandhi Kumar

                                     For Respondent         : Mr.S.Kamadevan




                     Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      C.R.P.No.2818 of 2022


                                                           ORDER

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the ex-parte order

dated 22.12.2020 passed in E.P.No.98 of 2019 in O.S.No.301 of 2019 by the

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sendurai.

2. The revision petitioner is the judgment debtor / tenant. The

respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit for recovery of possession in

O.S.No.301 of 2019 and the Suit was decreed in favour of the respondent/

plaintiff. An ex-parte decree was passed, since the revision petitioners had

not contested the Suit, despite service of notice. Thereafter, the respondent/

decree holder filed Execution Proceedings in E.P.No.98 of 2019 and the

Execution Court also granted sufficient time to the revision petitioners to

contest the matter. Even thereafter, the revision petitioners had not availed

the opportunity and contested the matter and consequently, the Execution

Court passed an order on 22.12.2020, ordering delivery by 02.02.2021. The

said order is under challenge in the present revision petition.

3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners state that

opportunity was not afforded to the revision petitioners and the principles of

natural justice has been violated. The suit was decreed ex-parte and even in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.2818 of 2022

the Execution Proceedings, delivery was ordered ex-parte and thus, the

revision petition is to be considered.

4. The learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff objected the said

contention by stating that sufficient opportunity was granted by the Trial

Court to contest the Suit in O.S.No.301 of 2019. The revision petitioners

remained absent and thus, an ex-parte decree was passed. Even after filing

of the Execution Petition, the revision petitioners/ judgement debtor has not

appeared and contested the matter, nor taken effective steps to set aside the

ex-parte decree passed in the Suit filed in O.S.No.301 of 2019.

5. The fact remains that the ex-parte decree in the Suit became final

and the Execution Court passed an order to deliver the possession of the

Suit Schedule Property to the respondent / decree holder by 02.02.2021.

6. Admittedly, the revision petitioners are the tenants in possession of

the subject premises for about seven (7) years. The respondent/ landlord

filed a Suit for delivery of possession, which was decreed. Therefore,

keeping these matters pending for a prolonged period would cause prejudice

to the interest of the parties.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.2818 of 2022

7. Considering the facts and circumstances and taking note of the fact

that the revision petitioners are tenants and ordered to be evicted by the

Execution Court, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the orders

passed by the Execution Court in E.P.No.98 of 2019. The Execution Court

shall execute the said order by handing over delivery of possession to the

respondent/ decree holder within a period of one (1) month from the date of

receipt of copy of this order.

8. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed.

No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

05.01.2023 skr/kak Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes

To The Judge, District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sendurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.2818 of 2022

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

skr/kak

C.R.P.No.2818 of 2022

05.01.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter