Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Vadivel vs The State Rep By
2023 Latest Caselaw 255 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 255 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2023

Madras High Court
K.Vadivel vs The State Rep By on 4 January, 2023
                                                                           Crl.O.P.No.32645 of 2022

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED: 04.01.2023

                                                      CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

                                           Crl.O.P.No.32645 of 2022


                K.Vadivel                                                                       ...
                Petitioner
                                                       Vs.

                1.The State Rep by,
                  The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
                  Annanagar District.

                2. The Inspector of Police,
                   F-5, Choolaimedu Police Station,
                   Chennai.                                                  ... Respondents


                PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
                to direct the 2nd respondent police to register FIR on the basis of the complaint
                dated 17.12.2022 given by the petitioner.


                                     For Petitioner     : Mr.J.N.Naresh Kumar

                                     For Respondents    : Mr.S.Santhosh,
                                                          Government Advocate (crl.side)




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/6
                                                                                   Crl.O.P.No.32645 of 2022

                                                       ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd

respondent police to register FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 17.12.2022

given by the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner

is tenant under one Gengan in respect of the shop comprised in Survery No.31,

New West Street, Avvai Nagar, Choolaimedu from the year 2017. The owner of

the property attempted to evict the petitioner forcibly from the premises.

Therefore, complaint was given by the petitioner against the said Gengan on

19.12.2022. In this regard, enquiry was conducted in CSR No. 482 of 2022.

For which, Gengan appeared for enquiry and also stated that he will not evict

the petitioner forcibly. The petitioner had filed a suit in O.S.No.1918 of 2022 on

the file of the 23rd City Civil Court, Chennai for the relief of not to evict him

unless by due process of law. The said suit is pending. Pending suit, Gengan

attempted to evict the petitioner from the premises with the help of rowdy

elements and also broke open the door and damaged the house hold properties

and also made death threat. In this regard, petitioner had lodged given a

complaint on 17.12.2022. But till now, no action was taken on his complaint.

Again on 21.12.2022, with the help of rowdy elements, owner Gengan

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.32645 of 2022

attempted to forcibly evict the petitioner from the premises. Hence, the present

petition is filed.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the

respondent submitted that, on receipt of complaint dated 17.12.2022 from the

petitioner, the second respondent police have conducted enquiry in C.S.R

No.932 of 2022 and it is pending for further investigation.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Advocate (crl.side) for the respondent.

4. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The

Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge

Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after

relying upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court

cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene

only in extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However, taking note of the

fact that the complaint is now being enquired, the Investigation officer is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.32645 of 2022

directed to issue notice to the parties and conduct enquiry as directed by the

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar

Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If any cognizable offence is made out,

the respondent police is bound to register the FIR otherwise they may close the

complaint. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is

disposed of.

04.01.2023

Internet:Yes/No sma

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.32645 of 2022

To

1.The State Rep by, The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Annanagar District.

2. The Inspector of Police, F-5, Choolaimedu Police Station, Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.32645 of 2022

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.

Sma

Crl.O.P.No.32645 of 2022

04.01.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter