Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15567 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2023
C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.12.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
Jeyanthi ... Appellant
in C.M.A.No.1718 of 2020
G.Balamurugan ... Appellant
in C.M.A.No.1720 of 2020
Vs
The Managing Director,
TamilNadu State Transport Corporation Limited,
Railway Station New Road,
Kumbakonam ... Respondent in both the Appeals
Prayer in C.M.A.No.1718 of 2020: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under
Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as against the Judgment and Decree
dated 19.07.2019 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.88 of 2017 on the file of the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
Page No.1 of 10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
Prayer in C.M.A.No.1720 of 2020: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under
Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as against the Judgment and Decree
dated 19.07.2019 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.7799 of 2016 on the file of the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
For Appellants
in both the Appeals ... M/s.A.Subadra
For Respondents
both the Appeals ... Mr.Murali Vinoth
JUDGMENT
Assailing the impugned award passed by the Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal Cum IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai in M.C.O.P.No.Nos.7799 of
2016 & 88 of 2017, the present appeals have been filed by the
claimants/appellants seeking enhancement of compensation.
2. On 20.01.2016, the claimants were travelling as passengers in a bus
bearing Reg.No.TN-68-N-0644 which was proceeding from Chennai to
Kumbakonam and the said bus was driven by its driver in a rash and negligent
manner and dashed against the lorry bearing Regn. No.TN-23-AD-1926 which
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
came in the opposite direction due to which, the claimants suffered grievous
injuries. Aggrieved by which, the claimants have filed claim petitions claiming
compensation for the injuries sustained by them, wherein, the Tribunal has
awarded a sum of Rs.50,800/- to the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.7799 of 2016
and a sum of Rs.48,800/- as compensation to the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.88
of 2017.
3. Before the Tribunal, the claimants examined themselves as P.W.1
and P.W.2 and marked Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.13. No documents were marked on the
side of the respondents however, the driver of the bus was examined as R.W.1.
After considering all the oral and documentary evidence, the Tribunal had
awarded the compensation amount of Rs.50,800/- & Rs.48,800/- to the
respective claimants. Aggrieved by the lower quantum of compensation
awarded by the Tribunal, the appellants/claimants are before this Court seeking
enhancement of compensation.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
4. Learned counsel appearing for the claimants submitted that when the
Tribunal has accepted that the lorry was driven in a rash and negligent manner
which was the cause for the accident and when the doctor, P.W.3, had clearly
deposed about the injuries suffered by the claimants, the compensation
awarded by the Tribunal is grossly inadequate. When P.W.3 has clearly
deposed about the disability suffered by the claimants, the amount of
Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability awarded by the Tribunal is wholly
inadequate. Further, the amount awarded under the other heads is also
minimal. Hence he prays for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the
Tribunal under various heads.
5. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent/insurance
company submitted that the amount of Rs.3000/- awarded per percentage of
disability is reasonable and so also the compensation awarded under the other
heads, which does not require any enhancement. Accordingly, he prays for
dismissal of the appeals.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
6. This Court gave its careful consideration to the submissions advanced
by the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials
available on record.
7. The factum of the accident is not disputed by the parties and so also
the liability. Therefore, this Court is not entering into the said aspect. The only
grievance of the claimant is with regard to the quantum of compensation
awarded. In this regard, the crucial evidence is that of P.W.3, the doctor, who
has deposed that the disability sufferred by the respective claimants. The
Tribunal, by adopting Rs.3000/- per percentage of disability has awarded a
sum of Rs.30,000/- to the respective claimants by fixing the disability at 10%.
In this regard, this Court had perused the disability certificates issued by the
P.W.3 viz., Ex.P.10 & Ex.P.12 and the same reveals that the claimants in
M.C.O.P.No.7799 of 2016 and M.C.O.P.No.88 of 2017 have suffered
disability of 35%. However, in view of the nature of injuries suffered by the
claimants, this Court is of the view that fixing disability at 20% in respect of
the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.7799 of 2016 and 15% in respect of the claimant
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
in M.C.O.P.No.88 of 2017 would be just and reasonable. It is further seen
from the disability certificates issued by P.W.3 that the Tribunal, had
erroneously adopted a sum of Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability and
awarded a sum of Rs.30,000/-. However, as per the existing law at the relevant
point of time, the Tribunal ought to have fixed a sum of Rs.5,000/- per
percentage of disability. Hence, this Court is inclined to fix a sum of Rs.5,000/-
per percentage of disability. Therefore, the amount under the head of disability
stands enhanced to a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (20 x Rs.5,000/- = Rs.1,00,000/-)
in M.C.O.P.No.7799 of 2016. Insofar as M.C.O.P.No.88 of 2017, the amount
towards disability stands enhanced to a sum of Rs.75,000/- (15 x Rs.5000/-
=Rs.75,000/-).
8. Further this Court finds that the compensation awarded under various
heads are just and reasonable and does not require any interference. However,
insofar as the compensation awarded towards pain and suffering is concerned,
a sum of Rs.25,000/- would be just and reasonable and to that extent the
compensation awarded under the said head is modified.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
9. In the above circumstances, the compensation awarded by the
Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.7799 of 2016 under the below mentioned heads are
modified as under :-
Head of Compensation Amount Amount awarded awarded by by this Court Tribunal Disability Rs.30,000/- 20% x Rs.5000/-
Rs = 1,00,000/-
Loss of Income Rs.8,000/- Rs.8,000/-
Pain and suffering Rs.5,000/- Rs.25,000/-
Transportation to Rs.2,000/- Rs.2,000/-
Hospital
Additional Nourishment Rs.3,000/- Rs.3,000/-
Damages to clothes Rs.1,000/- Rs.1,000/-
Attender Charges Rs.1,800/- Rs.1,800/-
TOTAL Rs.50,800/- Rs.1,40,800/-
10. Insofar as M.C.O.P.No.88 of 2017 is concerned, the compensation
awarded by the Tribunal under the below mentioned heads are modified as
under :-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
Head of Compensation Amount Amount awarded awarded by by this Court Tribunal Disability Rs.30,000/- 15% x Rs.5000/-
Rs = 75,000/-
Loss of Income Rs.6,000/- Rs.6,000/-
Pain and suffering Rs.5,000/- Rs.25,000/-
Transportation to Rs.2,000/- Rs.2,000/-
Hospital
Additional Nourishment Rs.3,000/- Rs.3,000/-
Damages to clothes Rs.1,000/- Rs.1,000/-
Attender Charges Rs.1,800/- Rs,1,800/-
TOTAL Rs.48,800/- Rs.1,13,800/-
11. Accordingly, the appeals are partly allowed and the impugned
Award of the Tribunal insofar as M.C.O.P.No.7799 of 2016 is modified by
enhancing the compensation amount from Rs.50,800/- to Rs.1,40,800/-.
Insofar M.C.O.P.No.88 of 2017, the compensation amount stands enhanced
from Rs.48,800/- to Rs.1,13,800/-. The third respondent-Insurance
Company is directed to deposit the respective amounts to the credit of
M.C.O.P.No.7799 of 2016 & M.C.O.P.No.88 of 2017 along with interest at
the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of
deposit and costs as awarded by the Tribunal, less, the amount, if any already
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
deposited, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy
of this judgment. On such deposit being made, the appellants/claimants are
permitted to withdraw the enhanced award amount, along with interest and
costs. The appellants/claimants are directed to pay the necessary Court fee for
the enhanced compensation amount. The Tribunal below shall disburse the
enhanced amount upon proof of payment of Court fee is produced by the
appellants/claimants. There shall be no order as to costs in the present appeals.
01.12.2023
Index : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No
NHS
To
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Cum IV Court of small causes, Chennai.
2.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
M.DHANDAPANI, J
NHS
C.M.A.Nos.1718 & 1720 of 2020
01.12.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!