Madras High Court
T.Jayamala vs The Commissioner on 8 August, 2023
W.P.No.123 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 08.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.123 of 2020
T.Jayamala ..Petitioner
.Vs.
1.The Commissioner
Directorate of Town and Country Planning
Chengalvarayan Building, 4th floor,
807 Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002
2.The Deputy Director
Directorate of Town and Country Planning
Salem Region
6, Sannasi Street, Subramaniyam Nagar
Sooramangalam, Salem-636 005
3.The Commissioner
Attur Municipality, Municipal Office, Attur-636 102
Salem District.
4.T.Kandaswamy ..Respondents
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.123 of 2020
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to
issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1, 2 and 3 to take appropriate and
necessary steps to demolish 664/16, 664/20, Sri Raj Krishna Residency, Kamarajar
Road, Attur, Salem District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated
10.04.2019, 11.05.2019 and 13.07.2019.
For Petitioner :: Mr.S.Yogalakshmi
For respondents : : Mr.P.Gurunathan, AGP for R1 and R2
Mr.Lourdu Paul Maurya, Standing counsel for R3.
Mr.L.Palanimuthu for R4.
ORDER
This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1, 2 and 3
to take appropriate and necessary steps to demolish 664/16, 664/20, Sri Raj Krishna
Residency, Kamarajar Road, Attur, Salem District, by considering the petitioner's
representation dated 10.04.2019, 11.05.2019 and 13.07.2019.
2. The petitioner who is stated to be the resident of Door No.20-B, Ward
No.12, Housing Board Quarters, Narashingapuram Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.123 of 2020
has filed this writ petition stating that the building at Door No.664, 664/16, 664/20,
Sri Raj Krishna Residency, Kamarajar Road, Attur, Salem District, owned by the 4th
respondent had constructed the said building without obtaining approval from the
Attur Municipality.
3. It is averred in the writ petition that the 4th respondent by violating the
building rules, constructed five storeyed building. The 4th respondent is running a
Government approved Liquor Bar at this building and without leaving any set back
or parking space, The 4th respondent Lodge is running a Lodge and it is creating
huge nuisance to the persons living in and around the said building. Therefore, the
petitioner sent representations dated 10.04.2019, 11.05.2019 and 13.07.019 to
Respondents 1 to 3, but till date no action has been taken against the unauthorised
construction.
4. The petitioner further averred that one P.Selvarajan filed W.P.No.21639 of
2017, seeking to disconnect the electricity service connection for the said
unauthorized building. This court passed the interim order on 11.09.2017 to
disconnect the E.B connection. The 4th respondent filed an application to restore the
electricity connection, but the same was dismissed on 07.11.2017. Against which the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.123 of 2020
4th respondent filed Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C).No.33863/2017 before
the Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court on 05.01.2018 taken up the matter
and disposed of as under:-
“We are not inclined to interfere in the impugned order and
accoridngly, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
However, we direct the authority concerned before whom the
application for regularization under the DTCP Building regularisation
Scheme 2017 is pending to decide the matter in accordance with law
within two months.”
The 4th respondent thereafter, filed Conmt.Pet(C).No.1283/2018 in
SLP(C).No.33863/2017 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Supreme Court by
order dated 17.09.2018, disposed the said Contempt petition as under:-
“ Without going into this question, we extend the period for deciding
the application made by the petitioner before the concerned authority within
three months from today in terms of order dated 5th January, 2018.
Copy of this order be filed along with the earlier order dated 5th
January, 2018 before the concerned authority for passing appropriate orders
on the application filed by the petitioner.”
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.123 of 2020
5. The 4th respondent filed counter affidavit before this court and it is averred
among other things that the application for regularization is pending before the
Director of Town and Country Planning, Chennai, and by order dated 28.09.2020,
the Secretary to Government has forwarded the same and till date, the regularization
is pending.
6. Mr.L.Palanimuthu, learned counsel for the 4th respondent has produced a
copy of the letter from the Assistant Director, Salem Town and Country Planning
Office, Salem District, dated 17.07.2023 addressed to the 4th respondent, wherein, it
has been stated that since the matter regarding regularization is sub judice before the
Apex Court, no final decision thereon shall be taken without leave of the court and
therefore, as per G.O.Ms.No.110, G.O.Ms.No.111, Housing and Urban Development
Department dated 22.06.2017, they can take a decision in the application for
regularization, only after final judgment pronounced by the Honourable Apex Court
in the subject issue.
7. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent also relied on the judgment of
this court dated 03.07.2023 in W.P.Nos.23889/2017 and 23119/2018 and prayed
this court to take a similar view in this matter.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.123 of 2020
8. The Hon'ble First Bench of this court in W.P.Nos.23889/2017 and
23119/2018 by order dated 03.07.2023 [V.B.R. Menon Vs 1.The Secretary to Govt.
of Tamil Nadu, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St. George,
Secretariat, Chennai~600 009 and 3 others], while dealing with writ petitions
seeking directions not to regularize the unauthorized constructions, held as under:-
“3. It is submitted by Mr.V.B.R.Menon and learned counsel for
the petitioner in W.P.No.23119 of 2018 that they are challenging the
same Government Orders in the present writ petitions. The present writ
petitions are seeking directions not to regularize the unauthorised
constructions in view of the said Government Orders.
4. If, according to the petitioners, the Government Orders are
already set aside in one matter, the same would stand good unless the
judgment of this Court is set aside by the Apex Court.
5. It is submitted that some of the parties have moved the Apex
Court and the Apex Court is seized of the matter. Naturally, the parties
would be bound by the orders that would be passed by the Apex Court.
6. In the light of the above, there is no propriety in keeping these
matters pending.
7. We, accordingly, dispose of the writ petitions with an
observation that if subsequently after the orders are passed by the Apex
Court the petitioners have any remedy open, they are entitled to agitate
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.123 of 2020
the same afresh. In that event, all contentions are kept open. There
will be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.25140, 25141 of
2017, 27002 and 27003 of 2018 are closed.”
9. In view of the fact that the matter regarding regularization is seized of by
the Apex Court and in the light of G.O.Ms.Nos.110, 111, Housing and Urban
Development Department dated 22.06.2017, the remedy open to the petitioner is to
await the orders of the Supreme Court. The petitioner is entitled to agitate the issue
afresh after the orders are passed by the Apex Court on the subject matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
J.N.B.J., N.M.J.,
08 .08.2023
Index : yes/no
Internet : yes/no
nvsri/vsi
To
1.The Commissioner
Directorate of Town and Country Planning
Chengalvarayan Building, 4th floor,
807 Anna Salai
Chennai-600 002
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.123 of 2020
J.NISHA BANU, J.
&
N.MALA, J.
nvsri
2.The Deputy Director
Directorate of Town and Country Planning
Salem Region, 6, Sannasi Street, Subramaniyam Nagar
Sooramangalam, Salem-636 005
3.The Commissioner, Attur Municipality
Municipal Office, Attur-636 102
Salem District.
W.P.No.123 of 2020
08.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
