Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharathi Consumer Care Products ... vs Sanku Soap Works
2023 Latest Caselaw 9745 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9745 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023

Madras High Court
Bharathi Consumer Care Products ... vs Sanku Soap Works on 7 August, 2023
                                                                     C.S. No.682 of 2016

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 07.08.2023

                                                      CORAM

                                     THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                               C.S. No.682 of 2016

                     Bharathi Consumer Care Products Pvt.Ltd.,
                     No.42, Bhavani Ellaiamman Koil Street,
                     Otteri, Chennai 600 012,
                     rep by its Chairman-cum-Executive Director,
                     Mr.Arunachalam Manickavel                        .. Plaintiff

                                                       -Vs.-

                     Sanku Soap Works
                      1-117/1, Rajabollaram,
                     (M) Medchal, Hyderabad-501401
                     State of Telangana.
                     and also at
                     Survey No. 63, Medchal,
                     Near Medi City Hospital X Roads,
                     Rajabollaram Village Hyderabad-501401           .. Defendant

                     PLAINT FILED UNDER ORDER IV RULE 1 OF O.S. RULES AND
                     ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CPC READ WITH SECTIONS 27, 28, 29, 134
                     and 135 of THE TRADEMARKS ACT 1999 & SECTIONS 51, 54, 55
                     AND 62 OF THE COPYRIGHTS ACT, praying to grant a judgment and
                     decree on the following terms.
                     1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                    C.S. No.682 of 2016

                                  a) a permanent injunction restraining the defendant by themselves,
                     their directors/partners as the case may be, their legal representatives,
                     successors in business, assigns, servants, agents, transporters, distributors,
                     printers, stockists, wholesalers, dealers, retailers, advertisers or any one
                     claiming through or under them from infringing plaintiff's registered
                     trademark SILVER FOAM XXX label/pouch by manufacturing,
                     distributing, marketing, selling, offering for sale, advertising or in any
                     other manner dealing in detergent powder, detergent cake, washing
                     powder etc., or any other product bearing the deceptively similar/almost
                     identical trademark and identical package, wrapper, container, carton,
                     label with colour scheme, getup, layout which are similar to plaintiff's
                     registered trade mark SILVER FOAM XXX label/pouch in any manner
                     whatsoever;
                                  (b) a permanent injunction restraining the defendant by themselves,
                     their directors/partners as the case may be, their legal representatives,
                     successors in business, assigns, servants, agents, transporters, distributors,
                     printers, stockists, wholesalers, dealers, retailers or any one claiming
                     through or under them from committing acts of copyright infringement by
                     making substantial reproduction of the plaintiff's registered copyright in
                     the artistic work SILVER FOAM XXX LABEL by use of identical colour
                     scheme of red, white and yellow with blue background for their SUN
                     package/wrapper or in any manner whatsoever,



                     2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       C.S. No.682 of 2016

                                  (c) a permanent injunction restraining the defendant by themselves,
                     their directors/partners as the case may be, legal representatives,
                     successors in business, assigns, servants, agents, transporters, distributors,
                     printers, stockists, wholesalers, dealers, retailers, advertisers or any one
                     claiming through or under them from committing acts of passing off and
                     enabling others to pass off by manufacturing, distributing, marketing,
                     selling, offering for sale, advertising or in any other manner dealing in
                     detergent powder, detergent cake, washing powder etc., or any other
                     product bearing the deceptively similar package, wrapper, container,
                     carton, label with colour scheme, getup, layout which are similar to
                     plaintiff's trade dress & get up in SILVER FOAM XXX package/wrapper
                     in any manner whatsoever,
                                  (d) the defendant be ordered to surrender to the plaintiff for
                     destruction, all containers, pouches, prints, dies, blocks, moulds and
                     plates, screen prints, packing and advertising material and any other
                     material in their possession, bearing the mark SUN which is a substantial
                     reproduction of the plaintiff's trade dress & get up and copyright in the
                     artistic work SILVER FOAM XXX package/wrapper;
                                  (e) the defendant be ordered to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.
                     1,00,000/- as damages for their wrongful and illegal activities by use of
                     trademark EXTRA FOAM SUN label and artistic work therein;
                                  (f) a preliminary decree be passed in favour of the plaintiff directing
                     the Defendant to render account of profits made by use of trademark

                     3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      C.S. No.682 of 2016

                     EXTRA FOAM SUN label with identical artistic work therein and final
                     decree be passed in favour of the plaintiff for the amount of profits thus
                     found to have been made by the defendant, after the latter have rendered
                     accounts;
                                  (g) for costs of the suit;


                                        For plaintiff          :M/s.Vandana Jain
                                                                for Mr.Arun C.Mohan

                                        For Defendant          : Mr.M.Sriram


                                                     JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks permission of this Court

to withdraw the suit and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

counsel for the plaintiff, the Civil Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No

costs.

07.08.2023 srn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.682 of 2016

P.T.ASHA, J.,

srn

C.S. No.682 of 2016

07.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter