Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Minor S.Priyadharsan vs The Secretary To Government
2023 Latest Caselaw 9606 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9606 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023

Madras High Court
Minor S.Priyadharsan vs The Secretary To Government on 3 August, 2023
                                                                    WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023


                              BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 03.08.2023

                                                   CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                           WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023
                                                     and
                                  WMP(MD)Nos.15162, 15164 and 15166 of 2023


                     Minor S.Priyadharsan
                                                                 ... Petitioner
                                                     Vs


                     1.The Secretary to Government,
                       Department of Health and Family Welfare,
                       Secretariat,
                       Fort St.George,
                       Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The Director of Medical Education and Research,
                       Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
                       Government of Tamil Nadu,
                       Chennai.

                     3.The Secretary,
                       The Selection Committee,
                       Directorate of Medical Education and Research,
                       No.162, Periyar EVR High Road,
                       Kilpauk,
                       Chennai – 600 010.

                     4.The Common committee,
                       Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu,
                       Chennai.
                                                         ... Respondents
                     [R4 is suo motu impleaded vide
                     order dated 26.07.2023 ]

                     1/16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

                             PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226
                     of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ
                     of      Certiorafied       mandamus       to   call   for   the    records
                     relating to the impugned provisional rank list of
                     candidates            eligible   for     sports     category   dated      Nil
                     publiched on 24.07.2023(MBBS/BDS) (Government quota)
                     Course 2023-2024 Session) by the 3rd respondent and
                     quash           the     same     and     consequently       direct        the
                     respondents to issue revised rank list for special
                     reservation for Eminent Sports Person by awarding 330
                     marks to the petitioner's son and conduct counselling
                     in pursuance of the revised rank list for the sports
                     quota.


                                  For petitioner        : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi
                                  For Respondent        : Mr.J.Ravindran,
                                  Nos.1 and 2               Additional Advocate General
                                                             assisted by
                                                            Ms.D.Farjana Ghousia
                                  For Respondent            : Ms.Sneka
                                  No.3
                                  For Respondent            : Mr.Azhaguram
                                  No.4


                                                            ORDER

The petitioner S.Priyadharsan is a minor and he

is represented by his mother and natural guardian. He

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

has appeared in the National Eligibility cum Entrance

Test conducted on 07.05.2023. He is an athlete in

Roller Skating. He has participated in the State

Level Championships Competitions and won Gold Medals.

He has also won a Gold Medal in a District Level

Competition in the year 2019. The petitioner claims

that her son is entitled for 95 marks for acquired

Gold Medals in the state level championship

competition. The petitioner with a grievance that the

Gold Medal won by her son for the academic year

2021-2022 has not been considered by the 3rd

respondent, has filed this writ petition as against

the rank list dated 24.07.2023 published by the

respondents and for a consequential direction to

revise the rank list by awarding marks to her son for

the Gold Medals won by him for the year 2021-2022.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner's son has participated in the

State Level Competitions in Roller Skating and has

won Gold Medals consecutively for the year 2020-2021,

2021-2022 and 2022-2023 conducted by the Tamil Nadu

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

Roller Skating Association. However,

the respondents have not taken into consideration of

the gold medal won by him in the tournament conducted

for the year 2021-2022. It is to be noted that due to

Covid-19 pandemic, the tournament for the year 2021 –

2022 was conducted belatedly in the month of June

2022, instead of May 2022. Therefore the petitioner's

son ought to have been provided marks for the year

2021-2022 also. He further submits that since he is

having three Gold Medals, one medal for each academic

year, ie., for the year 2020-2021, 2021-2022 and

2022-2023, he should be provided marks for each year

tournament as per clause 4(c)(1) of Annexure VII of

the prospectus and if marks have been provided as

above, the petitioner would have got admission in the

MBBS seat. Therefore, this writ petition to be

allowed.

3.The learned Additional Advocate General

appearing for the respondents submits that as per

clause 5 of the prospectus, the candidates who are

applying under eminent sports persons category have

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

to first submit their application both through online

and offline mode and then have to submit the

downloaded filled in online application along with

two sets of enclosures on or before 10.07.2023

(thereafter time was extended till 12.07.2023)

in person in the 3rd respondent's office. Moreover in

clause 14(e) of the prospectus it has been

categorically held that, apart from online mode

application, the candidates applying under eminent

sports person should submit the downloaded filled in

online application along with two sets of enclosures

on or before the lase date to the 3rd respondent.

As per clause 14(3) of the prospectus, the number of

seats reserved for Eminent Sports Person are 8 seats

(MBBS-7 seats and BDS-1).

4.The learned Additional Advocate General further

submits that the candidates were instructed to

arrange the sports certificate as per the serial

number starting from June 2019 as given in the

Annexure VII (a) and (b) and only one highest

achievement in the tournament (among the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

International, National, State, Divisional and

District) in an academic year in the sports

disciplines listed in Table VIII will be considered

for awarding marks. In clause 5 of the Annexure VII

in the tabular column, it has been specifically

stated that the type of forms to be attached with the

certificates. For the academic year 2022-2023,

the petitioner had produced two certificates,

(i) for having won gold medal in State Level

Tournament conducted in the month of November 2022;

and (ii) for having participated in the National

Level Tournament, in the moth of December 2022.

As per the prospectus, only one highest achievement

in a tournament in an academic year was considered

and marks were awarded for having won the Gold Medal.

5.The learned Additional Advocate General

further submits that for the academic year 2021-2022,

the petitioner had produced two certificates (i) for

having won the Gold medal in State Level Tournament

in the month of June 2022; and (ii) for having

participated in the National Level Tournament in the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

month of December 2021. The first certificate cannot

be considered for the academic year 2021-2022, since

it was issued in the month of June 2002, it has to be

considered for the academic year 2022-2023, for which

already marks have been provided by taking into

consideration of the certificate issued in the month

of November 2022. Therefore the certificate issued in

the month of June 2022 could not be considered.

With respect to the other certificate produced by the

petitioner for participation in the National Level

Tournament issued in the month of December 2021,

it could not be considered due to non submission of

Form II, which is mandatory as per the prospectus.

Since the petitioner has not produced Form -II as

required, the certificate was not considered.

6.The petitioner has now produced the Form II

for the participation in National Level Tournament

before this Court and this Form was only obtained on

26.07.2023 after the cut-off date for submitting

Form-II. The certificate of six other candidates for

the participation in the National Level Tournaments

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

have been rejected on the very same ground that they

have not submitted their Form II. Further,

179 applications were received for 8 seats under the

sports quota, counselling for all those 8 seats was

completed on 27.07.2023 and the allotment orders were

also issued to the candidates.

7.This Court considered the rival submission and

perused the materials placed on record.

8.The petitioner's son has appeared in the

National Eligibility cum Entrance Test conducted on

07.05.2023 for admission of MBBS/BDS courses.

The petitioner's son is an athlete and he has

participated in the State Level Skating Competition

conducted by the Trichy Regional Roller Skating

Association.

9.The Trichy Roller Skating Association has

conducted the 30th Tamil Nadu State Roller Skating

Championship Competition from 3rd March to 5th March

of 2021 for the academic year 2020-2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

The petitioner's son who has participated in the said

competition has won the gold medal. The Trichy Roller

Skating Association has conducted the 31st Tamil Nadu

State Roller Skating Championship Competition

on 8th and 9th of June 2022 for the academic year

2021-2022. The petitioner' son has participated in

this Competition and also bagged gold medal.

The 32nd Tamil Nadu Roller Skating Championship

Competition was conducted from 3rd to 6th November 2022

for the academic year 2022-2023. The petitioner's son

participated in the competition and has won gold

medal. Since the tournament for the academic year

2021-2022 was conducted in the month of June 2022,

it was not considered by the respondents for awarding

marks stating as it falls under the academic year

2022-2023, for which already marks were provided.

10.It is relevant to extract clause - II of

Annexure VII of the Prospectus for Admission to

MBBS/BDS Degree Courses 2023-2024 Session and which

reads as follows:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

“2.The candidate shall submit all the sports certificates along with participation certificates and relevant forms issued by Association / Federation concerned, but only one highest achievement in a tournament (among the International, National, State, Divisional and District ) in an academic year in the sports disciplines listed in Table VIII will be considered for awarding marks.”

11.As per the above clause, the highest

achievement in a tournament in an academic year will

be considered for awarding marks. The petitioner

claims that due to Covid-19 pandemic, the tournament

for the academic year 2021-2022 was conducted

belatedly in the month of June 2022, instead of May

2022. The issue to be decided is whether the

petitioner is entitled for marks for the certificate

for having won the gold medal in the State Level

Championship competition conducted in the month of

June 2022 for the academic year 2021-2022. In this

regard it is relevant to extract Clause 4 (c) (1) of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

Annexure – VII of the prospectus and the same is

extracted hereunder:

“1.State Level Tournaments should officially be recognised as the regular annual championship or tournament by respective official state association or SAI or SDAT will be considered (for each year) for awarding marks.”

12.Thus as per the above clause, tournament

conducted by the State Association in each year has

to be considered for awarding marks, whereas, clause

2 of Annexure-VII states that only one highest

achievement in a tournament in an academic year will

be considered for awarding marks. The petitioner

claims that the tournament conducted in the month of

June 2022 falls under the term “each year tournament”

as per the definition of Clause 4 (c) (1) of

Annexure – VII and therefore, the petitioner has to

be provided for marks for the certificate issued in

the month of June 2022, as it is a tournament for the

year 2021-2022, though it was conducted in the month

of June 2022. Whenever there are two meanings are

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

possible, Rules of Interpretation come into play.

It is relevant to extract the decision of the Hon'ble

Apex Court in Anwar Hasan Khan Vs Mohammad Shafi and

Ors [AIR 2002 SC 2984], which reads as follows:

“8. It is settled that for interpreting a particular provision of an Act, the import and effect of the meaning of the words and phrases used in the statute has to be gathered from the text, the nature of the subject matter and the purpose and intention of the statute. It is cardinal principle of construction of a statute that effort should be made in construing its provisions by avoiding the conflict and adopting a harmonious construction. The statute or rules made thereunder should be read as a whole and one provision should be construed with reference to the other provision to make the provision consistent with the object sought to be achieved. The well-known principle of harmonious construction is that effect should be given to all the provisions and a construction that reduces one of the provision to a "dead letter" is not harmonious construction.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

13.It is also relevant to extract the decision

of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mahadeolal Kanodia vs.

The Administrator General of West Bengal reported in

[AIR 1960 SC 936], which reads as follows:

“8............The third rule is that if in any legislation, the general object of which is to benefit a particular class of persons, any provision is ambiguous so that it is capable of two meanings, one which would preserve the benefit and another which would take it away, the meaning which preserves it should be adopted.....”

14.Therefore applying the Rules of Harmonious

Construction and the Beneficial Rule of

Interpretation as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court

in the above cited judgments, this Court comes to a

conclusion that the petitioner's son has to reap the

benefit. Further there is no dispute that the

petitioner is an athlete and he has won in the

competitions as narrated above.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

15.Considering the Rules of Interpretation as

laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the above

cited judgments, the tournament was being conducted

each year and for a particular academic year it was

conducted in the next academic year due to outbreak

of Covid-19 Pandemic, this writ petition is allowed

with a direction to the respondents to provide marks

for the certificate issued in the month of June 2022

also, for having won the gold medal. No costs.

Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are

closed.


                                                                               03.08.2023

                     NCC          : Yes / No
                     Index: Yes / No
                                  Note: Issue order copy today
                     dsk
                     To

                     1.The Secretary to Government,

Department of Health and Family Welfare, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of Medical Education and Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.

3.The Secretary, The Selection Committee,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

Directorate of Medical Education and Research, No.162, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

4.The Common committee, Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

dsk

WP(MD)No.18178 of 2023

03.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter