Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9495 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2023
Cont.P.No.288 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Cont.P.No.288 of 2023
The General Secretary,
Tamil Nadu Grama Bank Workers Union,
Regn.No.457/VDR,
3/12, M.K.Nagar, Seelanaickenpatti,
Salem-636 201. .. Petitioner
..Vs..
S.Selvaraj,
The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Grama Bank,
Head Office, Yercaud Road,
Hasthampatti, Salem-7. .. Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of
Courts Act, to punish the respondent for wilful contempt and non-
compliance of the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.22682 of 2005
dated 25.10.2021.
For Petitioner : M/s.D.Geetha
For Respondent : Mr.N.G.R.Prasad
*******
ORDER
By an order dated 25.10.2021 this Court in W.P.No.22682 of
2005 passed the following order:-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.288 of 2023
"6. With these observations, the impugned award, insofar as it relates to fixing the entitlement of computer increment to the employees of the petitioner-bank, is modified to the effect that such employees would be entitled for the computer increment, "from the date on which the bank was fully computerised". The Writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed."
2. Aggrieved against the said order, the W.A.No.1135 of 2022 is
filed on 10.06.2022 and the same was dismissed. As against that
order they filed SPL.AP(c)No.15169 of 2022, dated 10.10.2022 before
the Supreme Court and the same was dismissed. Thereupon, it is
represented by Mr.N.G.R.Prasad, learned counsel for the
respondent/Tamil Nadu Grama Bank that they have filed a Review
Application No.90 of 2023 before the Division Bench.
3. At this juncture the contempt application has also been filed
on 09.06.2023, the case is posted today. The contempt petition
should have been filed before the Review Application.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.288 of 2023
4. Today, Mr.N.G.R.Prasad, learned counsel contended that for
implementation of the order of this Court which has modified the
award passed by the Labour Court, they have to move the Execution
Application before the Labour Court and not by way of contempt
application and the learned counsel relied upon the judgment of the
Division Bench of this Court in Cont.A.No.381 of 2001, dated
02.07.2001wherein it is held as under:
"For enforcing award, procedure provided in I.D Act to be followed, contempt application no substitute for execution of award of Labour Court as modified by High Court in writ appeal."
5. Hence I find that the parties can agitate the right before the
Labour Court. It is open to the petitioner herein to move the
appropriate Execution Petition before the appropriate Court.
6. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.
02.08.2023
nvi
Internet: Yes/No
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.288 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
nvi
Cont.P.No.288 of 2023
02.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!