Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11572 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2023
W.P(MD)No.10504 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.10504 of 2015
S.M.Xavier ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub-Collector,
Cheranmahadevi,
Tirunelveli District.
2.The Tahsildar,
Radhapuram Taluk,
Tirunelveli District.
3.V.Murugan ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the
records of the 1st respondent in Ni.Mu.9399/2012 (A-1) in 30.04.15 and quash
the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to rectify the mistake of
classification of entry made as Poromboke lane and bring the petitioner name in
the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam
For Respondent : Mr.D.Gandhiraj
Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2
: Mr.S.Palanivelayuthan for R3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
W.P(MD)No.10504 of 2015
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2. The petitioner sought issuance of patta in respect of the petition
mentioned pathway. According to the petitioner, it is an exclusive pathway.
The stand of the respondents was that the pathway is a public pathway. In the
impugned order, it has been mentioned that the petitioner has already taken
recourse to the civil proceedings.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the
petitioner pointed out that though the suit was dismissed by the trial Court,
A.S.No.71 of 2019 filed by him before the Sub Court, Valliyoor ended in his
favour. The third respondent namely Murugan figured as sole defendant /
respondent. It is not known if Murugan has filed any second appeal. If any
such second appeal is filed, the rights of the parties will abide by the outcome
of the second appeal. So long as the decree dated 29.03.2022 in A.S.No.71 of
2019 is holding the filed, the petitioner's entitlement for patta cannot be
negatived.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.10504 of 2015
4. In this view of the matter, the order impugned in the writ petition is set
aside. The second respondent is directed to issue patta in favour of the
petitioner in respect of the petition mentioned pathway. I make it clear that this
will abide by the outcome of the second appeal that may be filed either by the
third respondent or any third party against the Judgment and decree in A.S.No.
71 of 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Valliyoor.
5. The Writ Petition is allowed. No costs.
30.08.2023
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
rmi
To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub-Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.10504 of 2015
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
W.P(MD)No.10504 of 2015
30.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!