Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs /
2023 Latest Caselaw 10985 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10985 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2023

Madras High Court
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs / on 22 August, 2023
                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                     DATED: 22.08.2023

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
                                                    AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                                W.A.(MD)No.932 of 2015
                                                         and
                                                 M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2015

                     1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                       Rep. by Secretary to Government,
                       Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
                       Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

                     2.Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings,
                       Rep.by its Commissioner,
                       No.5/1B, Vinayaganagar,
                       Madurai-625 020.                                   ...Appellants

                                                            /Vs./
                     M.Prabakar                                           ...Respondent

                     PRAYER:- Writ Appeal- filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act,
                     to allow this writ appeal by setting aside the order dated 17.11.2014
                     made in W.P.(MD)No.11111 of 2009 on the file of this Court.


                                    For Appellants      : Mr.S.Shaji Bino
                                                           Special Government Pleader
                                    For Respondent      : No Appearance


                     1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                    JUDGMENT

                        (Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)


                                  Having heard the detailed submissions of Mr.S.Saji Bino,

                     learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellants, we are

                     of the view that the order of the Writ Court dated 17.11.2014 is to be

                     reversed.

                                  2.The Writ Petitioner has sought quashing of a charge memo

                     issued to him and a consequential direction to the State to treat the

                     petitioner's suspension from 14.10.2003 to 10.06.2004 as duty period

                     with all consequential benefits.

                                  3.The charges related to the period when the Writ Petitioner

                     was serving as Joint Director of Development. The charge was based on

                     complaints given by Non Government Organisations (NGOs), by name

                     ARDA REEDOW, RUDACS and DERDS. The complaints were to the

                     effect that the petitioner had obtained large amount of loans from NGOs

                     for certain personal purposes and failed to repay the same, when they

                     demanded it back.




                     2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                  4.The Writ Petitioner was stated to have informed the NGOs

                     that the amounts have been spent during his visit to New Delhi to get

                     funds sanctioned for Theni District under Total Sanitation Campaign.

                     The complaints of the NGOs were forwarded to the Director of Rural

                     Development, who in-turn, forwarded the same to the Director of

                     Vigilance and Anti-corruption for detailed enquiry. Disciplinary

                     proceedings had also been initiated and the Writ Petitioner had been

                     suspended pending enquiry.

                                  5.The Writ Court has allowed the Writ Petition on the ground

                     that the complaints had come to be withdrawn by NGOs, who had

                     recanted their initial stand that there had been money transactions

                     between themselves and the petitioner. The Writ Court was, thus, of the

                     view that the department ought not to have proceeded with the enquiry

                     against the petitioner, in light of the withdrawal of the complaints by the

                     NGOs.

                                  6.Before us, Mr.S.Saji Bino, learned Special Government

                     Pleader has produced a copy of the confidential report of the Director of

                     Vigilance and Anti-corruption containing observations/findings in

                     relation to the loans availed by the Writ Petitioner from NGOs. There are


                     3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     discrepancies noted in regard to the conduct of the petitioner and the

                     procedure followed by him in regard to the sanitation projects.

                                  7.We are, thus, of the categoric view that it is appropriate that

                     such enquiry be carried to its logical conclusion. The withdrawal of their

                     complaints by the NGOs may be on account of any number of reasons,

                     but that by itself should not stand in the way of departmental enquiry

                     being carried out to ascertain the true facts, especially in light of the

                     gravity of charges levelled.

                                  8.In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Writ Appeal is

                     allowed.       The concerned appellant will issue notice to the writ

                     petitioner/sole respondent, proceed with the matter and complete the

                     enquiry within a period of twelve weeks from date of receipt of a copy of

                     this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is

                     closed.




                     NCC          :Yes/No                       [A.S.M.J.,] & [R.V.J.,]
                     Index        :Yes/No                                 22.08.2023
                     cmr




                     4/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                  DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.

AND R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

cmr

W.A.(MD)No.932 of 2015

22.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter