Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Mani vs The Superintendent Of Police
2023 Latest Caselaw 10323 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10323 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2023

Madras High Court
K.Mani vs The Superintendent Of Police on 14 August, 2023
                                                                               W.P. No.23873 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 14.08.2023

                                                      CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                               W.P.No.23873 of 2023
                     K.Mani
                     S/o.Kumaran                                             .. Petitioner
                                                         Vs.
                     1.The Superintendent of Police,
                       Office of the Superintendent of Police,
                       Tiruppur District, Tiruppur,
                       Tamil Nadu - 641 603.

                     2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                        Avinashi, Tiruppur - 641 654.

                     3. The Inspector of Police,
                        Cheyur Police Station,
                        66WQ + G24, Gobichettipalayam - Avinashi Road,
                        Sevur, Tamil Nadu - 641 655.                         ..Respondents

                     PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to
                     give adequate police protection to erect, install, and maintain the Mobile
                     phone tower in the property of the petitioner comprised in Plot No.45 in
                     Gouse Nagar in Survey No.116/1, within the Muriyandampalayam
                     Panchayat limit, Avinasi Vattam, Tiruppur District 641 301, of an extent of

                     1/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       W.P. No.23873 of 2023

                     1600 square feet.
                                        For Petitioner        :   Mr. N. Ganesh
                                        For Respondents       :   Mr.A.Damodaran
                                                                  Additional Public Prosecutor
                                                               *****

                                                            ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to

give adequate police protection to erect, install, and maintain the Mobile

phone tower in the property of the petitioner comprised in Plot No.45 in

Gouse Nagar in Survey No.116/1, within the Muriyandampalayam

Panchayat limit, Avinasi Vattam, Tiruppur District 641 301, of an extent of

1600 square feet.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is engaged in the

business of providing telecom services viz., broadband Internet services and

other allied services. For the said purpose, cell phone towers are going to

be erected. The petitioner had also entered into a lease agreement with the

owner of the property and had taken steps to install the cell phone tower.

Already, the Government of Tamil Nadu has granted exemption to all the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.23873 of 2023

Telecom companies to install the cell phone towers by virtue of Government

Order passed in G.O.Ms.No.2, dated 01.04.2002.

3. When the petitioner attempted to erect the cell phone tower, the

residents of the area came to the spot and started causing hindrance to the

company officials from carrying out the construction work. The petitioner

also gave a representation dated 16.06.2023 to the third respondent police to

provide them with protection. However, the third respondent police had not

acted upon the said complaint and therefore, the present petition has been

filed.

4. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner would submit that the

issue involved in this petition is covered by the earlier judgments of this

Court. The learned counsel brought to the notice of this Court the order

passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.16618 of 2018.

5. It will be appropriate to extract the relevant portions of the order in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.23873 of 2023

Crl.O.P.No.16618 of 2018 and the same is extracted hereunder:-

“2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's company had the contract agreement for installation of cell phone tower with M/s.Indus Towers Limited, a company registered under the provisions of Indian Companies Act, 1956. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that whenever the petitioner's company attempted to erect transmission cell phone tower, publics are causing interference. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that by order dated 05.03.2015, the Honourable First Bench of this Court, in W.P.Nos.24976 of 2008 and etc., batch, held that because of the advancement in the science, no one has prevented to erect cell phone towers. It is also submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint dated 24.02.2016 to the first respondent police seeking police protection, for which C.S.R.No.42 of 2016 and since the same has not been considered so far, he has come up with the present petition for the relief stated supra.

3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to send a fresh representation to the respondent and on receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to consider the representation to be submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.23873 of 2023

6. This Court has consistently taken the view that no one can be

prevented from erecting the cell phone towers on a mere apprehension about

the effect of radiation from the cell phone tower. The apprehension does not

have a scientific backing. Till a positive finding is given in this regard, cell

phone towers cannot be prevented to be installed on mere apprehensions.

7. For the reasons stated above, there shall be a direction to the third

respondent police to provide police protection to the petitioner for erection

of the cell phone tower. The third respondent police shall ensure that the

entire process goes on in a smooth manner, without giving raise to any law

and order problem and the petitioner shall pay a cost of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

Ten thousand only) to the respondent police towards police protection.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.23873 of 2023

gm

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No Costs.

14.08.2023

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No gm To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu - 641 603.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Avinashi, Tiruppur - 641 654.

3. The Inspector of Police, Cheyur Police Station, 66WQ + G24, Gobichettipalayam - Avinashi Road, Sevur, Tamil Nadu - 641 655.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

W.P. No.23873 of 2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter